Advertisement

Radio Emission Source Localization Using Mobile Stations and Field Strength Measurement

  • Anatoly Rembovsky
  • Alexander Ashikhmin
  • Vladimir Kozmin
  • Sergey Smolskiy
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 43)

The determination of RES location using the mobile direction finder, under urban conditions, is not a trivial problem. The complexity of this problem is explained by the fact that, under urban conditions, the electromagnetic field received by the direction finder includes the additional random component ensemble caused by the reflections from local objects. Among them, we may mention irregularities of the topography, buildings and other structures, made of various materials, the electric transmission lines, automobiles and other objects, as well as diffraction. Since these components have random amplitudes and phases, the summary field will also randomly change. At station movement, the varying interference pattern will be observed, when the received signal level changes, relative to some average value.

Keywords

Field Strength Mobile Station Direction Finding Radio Wave Propagation Urban Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Spectrum Monitoring Handbook, ITU-R, Geneva, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glaznev, A.A., Kozmin, V.A., Litvinov, G.V., and Shadrin, I.A., Multi-station Radio Monitoring Systems for Determination of Radio Emission Localization (in Russian). Special technologies. 2002. Special Edition, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rogers, D.F., and Earnshaw, R.A., Computer Graphics Techniques: Theory and Practice. Springer, 2001, 542 pp.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., and Stein, C., Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd Edition, The MIT Press, 2001, 1184 pp.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CCIR. Report 715-2, Propagation by Diffraction. – Recommendation and reports, XVII Plenary assembly, Dusseldorf, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larin, E.A., Calculation of Radio Wave Diffraction Attenuation on the Surface Traces over the Cross-country and Highlands (in Russian). Elektrosviaz, No. 1, 1997, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hata, M., Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land Mobile Radio Service, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. VT-29, No. 3, 1980, pp. 317–325.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okamura, J. et al., Field Strength and Its Variability in VHF and UHF Land Mobile Radio Services, Rev. Inst. Elec. Eng., Vol. 16, No. 9–10, 1968, pp. 825–873.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delise, G.Y., Propagation Loss Prediction: A Comparative Study with Application to the Mobile Radio Channel, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., Vol. VT-34, No. 2, 1985, pp. 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kvartirkin, E.M. (ed.), Ultra-High-Waves Propagation in Towns (in Russian). Collection of papers. VINITY. Science and Technology Resume. Series Radio Tekhnika, Vol. 42, 1992, pp. 196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anatoly Rembovsky
    • 1
  • Alexander Ashikhmin
    • 1
  • Vladimir Kozmin
    • 1
  • Sergey Smolskiy
    • 2
  1. 1.JSC IRCOSMoskvaRussia
  2. 2.Dept. Radio ReceiversTechnical University Moscow Power Engineering Inst.MoskvaRussia

Personalised recommendations