Distance and Internet Banking

  • Guido de Blasio


Internet-related possibilities might reduce the importance of distance for economic activity. By using data from the Survey on Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) of the Bank of Italy, this chapter investigates the validity of this assertion for Internet banking. It shows that there is no support for the argument that isolated consumers use e-banking more intensively than their less-isolated counterparts. It also highlights that, compared to less isolated clients, geographically remote clients are more frequently supplied with a loan by their own bank and evaluate personal acquaintances as an important factor more intensively. Overall, these findings support the relevance of soft information in lending practices to families and family businesses


City Size Soft Information Internet Banking Deposit Account Italian Household 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to thank Giorgio Albareto, Guglielmo Barone, Luigi Cannari, and Massimo Omiccioli. I am grateful to Diego Caprara and Christine Stone for their editorial assistance. The usual disclaimers apply.


  1. Berger A, Udell G. (1995) Small firms, commercial lines of credit, and collateral. Journal of Business 68:351–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger AN, Humphrey DB, Pulley LB (1996) Do consumers pay for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue function. Journal of Banking and Finance. 20(9):1601–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlin M, Mester LJ (1999) Deposits and relationship lending. Review of Financial Studies 12(3):579–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank for International Settlements (2003) Payment and settlement systems in selected countries. Bank for International Settlements, BasleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonaccorsi A, Piscitello L, Rossi C (2006) The north-south divide in Italian ITC endowment. Spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence. University of Pisa, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonaccorsi di Patti E, Gobbi G, Mistrulli E P (2004) The interaction between face-to-face and electronic delivery: the case of the Italian banking industry. Banca d’Italia, Economic Research Discussion Paper 508Google Scholar
  7. Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc. (1996), Consumer demand for Internet banking, Financial Services Group, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Brandolini A, Cannari L (1994) Methodological appendix: The Bank of Italy survey of household income and wealth. In: Ando A, Guiso L, Visco I (eds) Saving and the accumulation of wealth. Essays on Italian household and government saving behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlot S, Duranton G (2004) Communication externalities in cities. Journal of Urban Economics 56:581–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciccone A (2002) Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review 46:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corrocher N (2006) Internet adoption in Italian banks: An empirical investigation. Research Policy 35:533–544Google Scholar
  13. European Central Bank (1999) The effects of technology on the EU banking system. European Central Bank, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  14. European Central Bank (2002) Structural analysis of the EU banking sector. European Central Bank, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellison G, Ellison FS (2005) Lessons about markets from the internet. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2):139–158Google Scholar
  16. Evanoff DD (1988) Branch banking and service accessibility. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 20(2):191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. Journal of Urban Economics 58(3):389--420Google Scholar
  18. Gaspar J, Glaeser EL (1998) Information technology and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Economics 43:136–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gehring T (1998) Competing markets. European Economic Review 42(2):277–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenstein S, Prince J (2006) The diffusion of Internet and the geography of the digital divide in the United States. NBER WP 12182Google Scholar
  21. Hauswald R, Marquez R (2003) Information technology and financial services competition. The Review of Financial Studies 16(3):921–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ISTAT (2004) Le tecnologie dell'informazione e della comunicazione: disponibilità nelle famiglie e utilizzo degli individui. RomaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jimeniz E, Greenstein S (1998) The emerging internet retailing market as a nested diffusion process. International Journal of Innovation Management 2(3):281–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. JP Morgan Securities Ltd. (2000) Online Finance Europe. LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn BS (2004) Consumer adoption of online banking: Does distance matter? University of California at Berkeley Working paper E04–338Google Scholar
  26. Kashyap A, Rajan AR, Stein J (2002) Banks as liquidity providers: An explanation for the co-existence of lending and deposit-taking. Journal of Finance 57(1):33–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolko J (2000) The death of cities? The death of distance? Evidence from the geography of commercial internet usage. In: Vogelsan I, Compaine BM (eds) The internet upheaval. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennickell AB, Kwast ML (1997) Who uses electronic banking? Results from the 1995 survey of consumer finances. Paper presented at Annual Meetings of the Western Economic Association, Seattle, Washington, July 1997Google Scholar
  29. Mills BF, Whitacre BE (2003) Understanding the non-metropolitan-metropolitan digital divide. Growth and Change 34(2):219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moulton B (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro unit. Review of Economics and Statistics 72:334–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naisbitt R (1995) The global paradox. Avon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Petersen MA (2004) Information: Hard and soft. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  33. Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1994) The benefits of firm-creditor relationships: Evidence from small-business data. The Journal of Finance 49:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. The Journal of Finance LVII ( 6):2533–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  36. Sinai T, Waldfogel J (2004) Geography and the internet: Is the internet a substitute or a complement for cities? Journal of Urban Economics 56:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toffler A (1980) The third wave. Bantam Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Waldfogel J (2003) Preference externalities: An empirical study of who benefits whom in differentiated product markets. Rand Journal of Economics 34:557–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bank of ItalyResearch DepartmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations