A Convergence of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis: Immobilized Organometallic Catalysts

  • Rebecca A. Shiels
  • Christopher W. Jones


In recent years, significant research efforts have focused on combining the best properties of homogeneous (high activity and selectivity) and heterogeneous (ease of separation) catalysts by immobilizing analogs of homogeneous catalysts onto solid supports. Although there are many reports of this type of catalyst, optimized materials are often found empirically, as an understanding of how the immobilization process directly affects catalytic properties is not complete. In this chapter, model systems for examining design criteria as well as catalyst performance are reviewed for a variety of catalysts.


Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Homogeneous Catalyst Polymerization Catalyst Immobilize Catalyst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank the NSF (CTS-0133209; CTS-0210460; CBET-055354) and the DOE (DE-FG02-03ER15459) for funding. We would also like to acknowledge our collaborators on the palladium work, Dr. Marcus Weck, and Dr. Robert Davis.


  1. 1.
    Severn JR, Chadwick JC, Duchateau R, Friederichs N (2005) “Bound but Not Gagged” – immobilizing single-site a-olefin polymerization catalysts. Chem Rev 105:4073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McMorn P, Hutchings GJ (2004) Heterogeneous enantioselective catalysts: strategies for the immobilisation of homogeneous catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 33:108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wight AP, Davis ME (2002) Design and preparation of organic-inorganic hybrid catalysts. Chem Rev 102:3589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ying JY, Mehnert CP, Wong MS (1999) Synthesis and applications of supramolecular-templated mesoporous materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 38:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkett SL, Sims SD, Mann S (1996) Synthesis of hybrid inorganic-organic mesoporous silica by co-condensation of siloxane and organosiloxane precursors. Chem Commun 1367Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sayari A, Hamoudi S (2001) Periodic mesoporous silica-based organic-inorganic nanocomposite materials. Chem Mater 13:3151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fryxell GE (2006) The synthesis of functional mesoporous materials. Inorg Chem Commun 9:1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wulff G, Heide B, Helfmeier G (1986) Molecular recognition through the exact placement of functional groups on rigid matrices via a template approach. J Am Chem Soc 108:1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz A, Davis ME (2000) Molecular imprinting of bulk, microporous silica. Nature 403:286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bass JD, Katz A (2003) Thermolytic synthesis of imprinted amines in bulk silica. Chem Mater 15:2757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bass JD, Anderson SL, Katz A (2003) The effect of outer-sphere acidity on chemical reactivity in a synthetic heterogeneous base catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:5219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKittrick MW, Jones CW (2003) Toward single-site functional materials – preparation of amine-functionalized surfaces exhibiting site-isolated behavior. Chem Mater 15:1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hicks JC, Jones CW (2006) Controlling the density of amine sites on silica surfaces using benzyl spacers. Langmuir 22:2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKittrick MW, Jones CW (2004) Toward single-site, immobilized molecular catalysts: site-isolated Ti ethylene polymerization catalysts supported on porous silica. J Am Chem Soc 126:3052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu K, McKittrick MW, Jones CW (2004) Role of amine structure and site isolation on the performance of aminosilica-immobilized Zirconium CGC-inspired ethylene polymerization catalysts. Organometallics 23:4089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKittrick MW, Jones CW (2004) Effect of site isolation on the preparation and performance of silica-immobilized Ti CGC-inspired ethylene polymerization catalysts. J Catal 227:186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKittrick MW, Yu K, Jones CW (2005) Effect of metallation protocol on the preparation and performance of silica-immobilized Ti CGC-inspired ethylene polymerization catalysts. J Mol Catal A 237:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McKittrick MW, Jones CW (2005) Modulating the reactivity of an organometallic catalyst via immobilization on a spatially patterned silica surface. Chem Mater 17:4758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hicks C, Dabestani R, Buchanan AC III, Jones CW (2008) Assessing Site-Isolation of Amine Groups on Aminopropyl-Functionalized SBA-15 Materials via Spectroscopic and Reactivity Probes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 361:3024–3032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hicks JC, Dabestani R, Buchanan AC III, Jones CW (2006) Spacing and site isolation of amine groups in 3-aminopropyl-grafted silica materials: the role of protecting groups. Chem Mater 18:5022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen EY-X, Marks TJ (2000) Cocatalysts for metal-catalyzed olefin polymerization: activators, activation processes, and structure-activity relationships. Chem Rev 100:1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hicks JC, Mullis BA, Jones CW (2007) Sulfonic acid functionalized SBA-15 silica as a methylaluminoxane-free cocatalyst/support for ethylene polymerization. J Am Chem Soc 129:8426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu K, Jones CW (2003) Silica-immobilized Zinc B-diiminate catalysts for the copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide. Organometallics 22:2571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang J-S, Matyjaszewski K (1995) Controlled/”Living” radical polymerization. Atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of transition-metal complexes. J Am Chem Soc 117:5614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang J-S, Matyjaszewski K (1995) “Living”/controlled radical polymerization. Transition-metal-catalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of a conventional radical initiator. Macromolecules 28:7572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang J-S, Matyjaszewski K (1995) Controlled/”Living” radical polymerization. Halogen atom transfer radical polymerization promoted by a Cu(I)/Cu(II) redox process. Macromolecules 28:7901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kato M, Kamigaito M, Sawamoto M, Higashimura T (1995) Polymerization of methyl methacrylate with the carbon tetrachloride/dichlorotris(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II)/Methylaluminum bis(2, 6-di-tert-butylphenoxide) initiating system: possibility of living radical polymerization. Macromolecules 28:1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matyjaszewski K, Xia J (2001) Atom transfer radical polymerization. Chem Rev 101:2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hong SC, Paik H-J, Matyjaszewski K (2001) An immobilized/soluble hybrid catalyst system for atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 34:5099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haddleton DM, Duncalf DJ, Kukulj D, Radigue AP (1999) 3-Aminopropyl silica supported living radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate: dichlorotris(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(ii) mediated atom transfer polymerization. Macromolecules 32:4769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Honigfort ME, Brittain WJ (2003) Use of JandaJel resins for copper removal in atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 36:3111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hong SC, Matyjaszewski K (2002) Fundamentals of supported catalysts for Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP) and application of an immobilized/soluble hybrid catalyst system to ATRP. Macromolecules 35:7592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen JV, Jones CW (2004) Effect of the synthetic method and support porosity on the structure and performance of silica-supported CuBr/Pyridylmethanimine atom transfer radical polymerization catalysts. I. Catalyst preparation and characterization. J Polym Sci. Part A 42:1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nguyen JV, Jones CW (2004) Effect of the synthetic method and support porosity on the structure and performance of silica-supported CuBr/pyridylmethanimine atom transfer radical polymerization catalysts. II. Polymerization of methyl methacrylate. J Polym Sci. Part A 42:1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nguyen JV, Jones CW (2004) Design, behavior, and recycling of silica-supported CuBr-Bipyridine ATRP catalysts. Macromolecules 37:1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nguyen JV, Jones CW (2005) Recyclable polymerization catalysts: methyl methacrylate polymerization with silica-supported CuBr-bipyridine atom transfer radical polymerization catalysts. J Catal 232:276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blaser H-U, Indolese A, Naud F, Nettekoven U, Schnyder A (2004) Industrial R&D on catalytic C–C and C–N coupling reactions: a personal account on goals, approaches and results. Adv Synth Catal 346:1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weck M, Jones CW (2007) Mizoroki–Heck coupling using immobilized molecular precatalysts: leaching active species from Pd Pincers, entrapped Pd Salts, and Pd NHC complexes. Inorg Chem 46:1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gruber AS, Zim D, Ebeling G, Monteiro AL, Dupont J (2000) Sulfur-containing palladacycles as catalyst precursors for the Heck reaction. Org Lett 2:1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bergbreiter DE, Osburn PL, Liu Y-S (1999) Tridentate SCS Palladium(II) complexes: new, highly stable, recyclable catalysts for the Heck reaction. J Am Chem Soc 121:9531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bergbreiter DE, Osburn PL, Wilson A, Sink EM (2000) Palladium-catalyzed c–c coupling under thermomorphic conditions. J Am Chem Soc 122:9058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beller M, Riermeier TH (1998) Palladium-catalyzed reactions for fine chemical synthesis. Part 4. Phosphapalladacycle-catalyzed Heck reactions for efficient synthesis of trisubstituted olefins. Evidence for palladium(0) intermediates. Eur J Inorg Chem 1998:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Consorti CS, Flores FR, Dupont J (2005) Kinetics and mechanistic aspects of the Heck reaction promoted by a CN-Palladacycle. J Am Chem Soc 127:12054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yu K, Sommer W, Weck M, Jones CW (2004) Silica and polymer-tethered Pd-SCS-pincer complexes: evidence for precatalyst decomposition to form soluble catalytic species in Mizoroki–Heck chemistry. J Catal 226:101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yu K, Sommer W, Richardson JM, Weck M, Jones CW (2005) Evidence that SCS Pincer Pd(II) Complexes are only Precatalysts in Heck Catalysis and the Implications for Catalyst Recovery and Reuse. Adv Synth Catal 347:161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sommer W, Yu K, Sears JS, Ji Y, Zheng X, Davis RJ, Sherrill CD, Jones CW, Weck M (2005) Investigations into the stability of tethered palladium(II) pincer complexes during Heck catalysis. Organometallics 24:4351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Richardson JM, Jones CW (2006) Poly(4-vinylpyridine) and quadrapure TU as selective poisons for soluble catalytic species in palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions - application to leaching from polymer-entrapped palladium. Adv Synth Catal 348:1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Phan NTS, Van Der Sluys M, Jones CW (2006) On the nature of the active species in palladium catalyzed Mizoroki–Heck and Suzuki–Miyaura couplings - homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysis: a critical review. Adv Synth Catal 348:609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Phan NTS, Gill CS, Nguyen JV, Zhang ZJ, Jones CW (2006) Expanding the utility of one-pot multistep reaction networks through compartmentation and recovery of the catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations