Product Design, Pricing, and Capacity Investment in a Congested Production System

  • Sergio Chayet
  • Panos Kouvelis
  • Dennis Z. Yu
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 131)


We investigate a firm’s product positioning and capacity investment problem for a product that is vertically differentiated according to its design quality level. Customers arrive according to a Poisson process and are heterogeneous in the marginal valuation of the product’s quality level, making product choices to maximize a linear utility function of price and quality level. Resulting product demands are met through capacity investments in a production process, which is modeled as a queuing system. Capacity investment and variable production costs are functions of the processed product’s quality. We develop an integrated marketing-operations model that provides insights into the factors determining the right positioning of the product in terms of quality and pricing, the resulting market coverage, and the effects on production costs and congestion levels of the production process.


Product Design Quality Level Design Quality Optimal Capacity Congestion Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Benjaafar S, Gupta D (1998) Scope versus focus: Issues of flexibility, capacity, and number of production facilities. IIE Trans 30(5):413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chayet S, Kouvelis P, Yu DZ (2008) Product Variety and Capacity Investments in Congested Production Systems. Working Paper, Olin Business School, Washington University in St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  3. Choudhary V, Ghose A, Mukhopadhyay T, Uday R (2005) Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Management Sci 51(7):1120–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Groote X (1994) The flexibility of production processes: A general framework. Management Sci 40(7):933–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Moorthy KS (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci 3(4):288–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J Econom Theory 18:301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Netessine S, Taylor TA (2007) Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci 26(1):101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Olin Business SchoolWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessClarkson UniversityPotsdamUSA

Personalised recommendations