Managing Client Portfolio in a Two-Tier Supply Chain

  • Basak Kalkanci
  • Seungjin Whang
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 131)


Suppliers in a variety of industries today face the challenge of managing their business where the utilization of their capacities fluctuates dramatically over time. The fluctuations can be attributed to the business cycle of the economy, as well as to the amplification of demand variability as one moves upstream (i.e., the bullwhip effect). In this chapter, we investigate the source of the fluctuations by analyzing a two-tier supply chain where the supplier serves many clients whose demands are subject to individual trends and the business cycle of the general economy. We present conditions under which the bullwhip effect or the stabilizing effect of the clients’ orders is felt by the supplier. We also analyze how the supplier can build an efficient client portfolio by analyzing the impact of a new client on the expected profit to the supplier in a newsvendor setting. We derive the key performance indicators that can guide a supplier in the right direction of the client portfolio. Thus, by understanding the clients’ ordering behaviors and its impact on capacity decisions, the supplier can strategically select an efficient client portfolio, so that the risk-neutral supplier would maximize the expected long-term profit.


Supply Chain Business Cycle Revenue Management Bullwhip Effect Inventory Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baganha MP, Cohen MA (1998) The stabilizing effect of inventory in supply chains. Operations Research 46(3):72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berinato S (2001) What went wrong at Cisco? CIO Magazine, August 1Google Scholar
  3. Brumelle SL, McGill JI (1993) Airline seat allocation with multiple nested fare classes. Operations Research 41(1):127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Kelly K, Maulloo AK, Tan DKH (1998) Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness, and stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee H, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science 43(4):546–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee H, Whang S (2005) The bullwhip effect: A review of field study. In O. Carranza Torres and F. Villegas Moran, eds. The bullwhip effect in supply chains: A review of methods, components and cases. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  9. Porteus EL (2002) Foundations of stochastic inventory theory. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr S, Lovejoy W (2000) The inverse newsvendor problem: choosing an optimal demand portfolio for capacitated resources. Management Science 46(7):912–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sterman J (1989) Modeling managerial behavior: Misperception of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science 35:321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Talluri KT, van Ryzin G (2004) The theory and practice of revenue management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilson RB (1993) Nonlinear pricing. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations