Advertisement

Competing Through Mass Customization

  • Ali K. Parlaktürk
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 131)

Abstract

We consider a market with heterogeneous customer tastes served by a duopoly. In our base model the firms first decide whether to adopt MC, which enables a firm to provide each customer her ideal product configuration. A firm that chooses not to invest in MC serves a standard product. Following investment decisions, the firms competitively price their products. A customer evaluates a product alternative considering its price and misfit relative to her ideal point (and delay in our extended model). We solve for the resulting equilibrium and study its characteristics. We then study the competition between a firm that adopted MC and a firm that continues to sell standard products in more detail extending our base model to account for some key operational differences between these two firms: While the firm selling standard products usually carries product inventories, the firm selling custom products does not carry inventory, it makes-to-order and its customers incur waiting costs until they receive their orders. Our results are useful for characterizing conditions that favor custom and standard products under competition. We find that the value of mass customization critically depends on the firm’s competitive position, determined by its cost efficiency and perceived quality vis-á-vis its competitor: It may not be desirable even at zero cost due to its negative effect on price competition. A firm with an overall cost and quality disadvantage never adopts mass customization. We show that allowing firms to set custom prices for each product configuration leads to a broader adoption of mass customization compared to when they are restricted to uniform prices. Furthermore, we find that a customizing firm’s profit is not monotone in the market size and its ease of customization when competing against a firm selling standard products. We show that its competitive position crucially affects its ideal market size and its returns from improving the ease of customization.

Keywords

Market Size Price Competition Standard Product Customer Preference Mass Customization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal M, Kumaresh TV, Mercer GA (2001) The false promise of mass customization. McKinsey Quarterly 3:62–71Google Scholar
  2. Ahlström P, Westbrook R (1999) Implications of mass customization for operations management. International Journal of Operations Management 19(3):262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alptekinoglu A, Corbett CJ (2007) Leadtime—variety tradeoff in product differentiation. Working Paper, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  4. Alptekinoğlu A, Corbett CJ (2008) Mass customization versus mass production: Variety and price competition. M&SOM 10:204–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson DM (2004) Build-to-order & mass customization. CIM Press, Los Angels, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Axsäter S, (1995) Inventory control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen F, Eliashberg J, Zipkin P (1998) Customer preferences, supply-chain costs, and product-line design, in TH Ho, CS Tang, eds., Product Variety Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 123–144Google Scholar
  8. Cox MW, Alm R (1998) The right stuff: America’s move to mass customization. Technical report, Federal Reserve Bank of TexasGoogle Scholar
  9. d’Aspremont C, Gabszewicz J, Thisse JF (1979) On Hotelling’s stability in competition. Econometrica 17:1145–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dell M, Fredman C (2000) Direct from Dell: Strategies that revolutionized an industry. HarperCollins Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewan R, Jing B, Seidmann A (2003) Product customization and price competition on the Internet. Management Sci 49(8):1055–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feitzinger E, Lee HL (1997) Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Business Review 75(1):116–121Google Scholar
  13. Frazier C (2001) Swap meet: Consumers are willing to exchange personal information for personalized products. American Demographics 23(7):51–55Google Scholar
  14. Hadley G, Whitin T (1963) Analysis of inventory systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang K, Lee HL, Seifert RW (2006) Satisfying customer preferences via mass customization and mass production. IIE Transactions 38:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karnes CL, Karnes LP (2000) Ross controls: A case study in mass customization. Production and Inventory Management Journal 41(3):1–4Google Scholar
  18. Keenan F, Greene J, Crockett RO (2002) A mass market of one. BusinessWeek, December 2Google Scholar
  19. Keenan M, Saritas O, Kroener I (2004) A dying industry—or not? The future of the european textiles and clothing industry. Foresight 6(5):313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lihra T, Buehlmann U, Beauregard R (2005) Mass customization of wood furniture: Literature review and application potential. Working Paper, CENTOR, Universit’e Laval, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  21. Mendelson H, Parlaktürk AK (2008a) Competitive customization. M&SOM 10(3):377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendelson H, Parlaktürk AK (2008b) Product-line competition: Customization vs. proliferation. Management Science 54(12): 2039–2053Google Scholar
  23. Mirapaul M (2001) Made especially for you, in industrial quantities. The New York Times, March 11Google Scholar
  24. Moser K, Piller FT (2006) Integration challenges of mass customisation businesses: the case of steppenwolf. International Journal of Mass Customisation 1(4):507–522Google Scholar
  25. Piccoli G, Bass B, Ives B (2003) Custom-made apparel at lands’ end. MIS Quarterly Executive 2(2):74–84Google Scholar
  26. Piller F (2004) Mass customization: Reflections on the state of the concept. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 16:313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piller FT, Stotko CM (2002) Mass customization: four approaches to deliver customized products and services with mass production efficiency, in TS Durrani, ed., Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC-2002). Cambridge University, UK, 773–778Google Scholar
  28. Piller FT, Moeslein K, Stotko CM (2004) Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Production Planning and Control 15(4):435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pine BJ (1993) Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Riemer K, Totz C (2003) The many faces of personalization: An integrative economic overview of mass customization and personalization, in MM Tseng, FT Piller, eds., The customer centric enterprise: advances in mass customization and personalization. Springer Verlag, New York/Berlin, 35–50Google Scholar
  31. Schuler A, Buehlmann U (2003) Identifying future competitive business strategies for the U.S. residential wood furniture industry: Benchmarking and paradigm shifts, Technical report, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. Report NE-304Google Scholar
  32. Seifert RW (2002) The “Mi Adidas” mass customization initiative. International Institute for Management Development Case Study POM 249Google Scholar
  33. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1998) Information rules. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Syam B, Ruan R, Hess JD (2005) Customized products: A competitive analysis. Marketing Science 24(4):569–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Syam NB, Kumar N (2006) On customized goods, standard goods and competition. Marketing Science 25(5):525–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thisse JF, Vives X (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. American Economic Review 78(1):122–137Google Scholar
  37. Tirole J (1988) Theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  38. Tseng M, Jiao J (2001) Mass customization, in G Salvendy, ed., Handbook of industrial engineering, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York, 684–709Google Scholar
  39. Wind J (2001) The challenge of “customerization” in financial services. Communications of the ACM 44(6):39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xia N, Rajagopalan S (2006) Standard versus custom products: Competitive analysis. Working Paper, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  41. Zipkin P (2001) The limits of mass customization. MIT Sloan Man. Review 42(3):81–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kenan-Flagler Business SchoolUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations