• Ineke Haen Marshall
  • Ni He


The United States is very different from its European counterparts in many ways. Indeed, American “exceptionalism” has been documented in a vast amount of scholarly and popular writings on the western world (e.g. Ross, 1991; Madsen, 1998; Hellerman and Markovits, 2001; Lipset, 1955, 1997, 2000; Wrobel, 1996). This alleged American “exceptionalism” is important to understand in order to interpret differences in the problems of youth crime and victimisation between the US and other western countries, and – in a more narrow sense – American exceptionalism also has direct implications for the methodology, design and execution of the ISRD-2 study (which will be addressed in the section on the methodology). Although comparative research is interested in both similarities and differences (and in many ways, the United States is also very similar to the rest of the western world), we start this brief chapter highlighting some of the aspects that mostly differentiate the United States from its European counterparts.


School District Private School Ninth Grader Immigrant Youth Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2004). Dealing with Drugs in Europe: An Investigation of European Drug Control Experiences: France, the Netherlands and Sweden. The Hague: BJU Legal Publishers in co-operation with the Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Utrecht, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. Carey, N. and Farris, E. (1994). E.D. TAB: Curricular Differentiation in Public High Schools. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Publication # 95360. http:// pubid=95360 Google Scholar
  4. Freiberg, A. (2001). Affective versus effective justice: instrumentalism and emotionalism in criminal justice. Punishment and Society 3(2), 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garland, D. (1996). The limits of sovereign power, strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology 36, 460.Google Scholar
  6. Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American Life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  7. Hellerman, S. and Markovits, A. (2001). Offside: Soccer and American Exceptionalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ignatieff, M. (2005). American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kagan, R. (2003). Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  10. Lipset, S. (1955). The First New Nation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Lipset, S. (1997). American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Lipset, S. (2000). Still the exceptional nation? The Wilson Quarterly 24, 31.Google Scholar
  13. Leuw, Ed and Haen Marshall, I. (1994). Between Prohibition and Legalization: The Dutch Experiment in Drug Policy. New York: Kugler Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Madsen, D. (1998). American Exceptionalism. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  15. Marshall, I. H. and Farrell, A. (2008). Racial victimization in the United States. In: J. A. Winterdijk and G. A. Antonopoulos (eds.) Racist Victimization: International Reflections and Perspectives. Toronto, ON: De Sitter Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Parrillo, V. (1996). Diversity in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ross, D. (1991). Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. University of Michigan News Service. (2007). Drug and Alcohol Press Release and Tables. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan News Service.Google Scholar
  19. Wrobel, D. (1996). The End of American Exceptionalism: Frontier Anxiety from the Old West to the New Deal. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Anthropology and College of Criminal JusticeNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations