Advertisement

Synthetic Phenomena and Dynamic Methodologies

  • Jytte Bang
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, dynamic methodologies are viewed as empirically and theoretically informed tools which help the researcher to study developmental processes. Dynamic methodologies will be discussed from an ecological perspective, that is, by taking seriously the individual—environment reciprocity as the unit of analysis. This perspective brings into focus the issue of atomism/elementarism which assumes rigid distinctions between sensations, thoughts, and acts. Dewey (1896) already addressed the problem when he said that according to such assumptions, sensory stimulus, the central activity (standing for the idea), and the motor discharge (standing for the act proper) are three different kind of things.

Keywords

Everyday Life Subject Matter Environmental Property Human Environment Psychological Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baldwin, J. M. (1897). The genesis of social “interests”. The Monist, 7, 341–357.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. M. (1899/1973). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, J. M. (1906). Thought and things, or genetic logic. I: Functional logic, or genetic theory of knowledge. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, J. M. (1908). Thought and things, or genetic logic. II: Experimental logic, or genetic theory of thought. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, J. M. (1911). Thought and things, or genetic logic. III: Interest and art being real Logic. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, J. M. (1915). Genetic theory of reality. New York: The Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, J. M. (1930). Autobiography of James Mark Baldwin. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (pp. 1–30). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bang, J. (2006). Hvad er en læresituation? In B. Elle, K. N. Nielsen, & M. Nissen (Eds.), Pædagogisk Psykologi – Positioner og Perspektiver (pp. 103–122). København: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  9. Bang, J. (2008). Conceptualising the environment of the children in a cultural-historical approach. In M. Hedegaard & M. Fleer, J. Bang, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Studying children: A cultural-historical approach (pp. 118–138). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bang, J. (2009). An environmental affordance perspective on the study of development—Artefacts, social others, and self. In M. Hedegaard, M. Fleer, & J. Tudge (Eds.), World yearbook of education (pp. 160–178). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Barker, R. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Barker, R., & Wright, H. (1966). One boy’s day—A specimen record of behavior. Connecticut: Sted Archon Books.Google Scholar
  13. Barker, R., & Wright, H. (1971). Midwest and its children—The psychological ecology of an American town. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
  14. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M., & Jensen, U. J. (Eds.). (1999). Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, M. (1997). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Costall, A. (1981). On how so much information controls so much behaviour: James Gibson’s theory of direct perception. In G. Butterworth (Ed.), Infancy and epistomology: An evaluation of piaget’s theory. Hemel Hempstead: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  18. Costall, A. (1986). The “psychologist’s fallacy” in ecological realism. Teorie & Modelli, III(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
  19. Costall, A. (2007). The windowless room: ‘Mediationism’ and how to get over it. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 109–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Davydov, V. V. (1977). Arten der Verallgemeinerung im Unterricht. Berlin: Volk und Wissen.Google Scholar
  21. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrenfels, C. v. (1988). On ‘Gestalt qualities’. In B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of Gestalt theory (pp. 82–117). München: Philosophia. (Original work published 1890: über gestaltqüalitäten)Google Scholar
  23. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  24. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Good, J. M. M. (2007). The affordances for social psychology of the ecological approach to social knowing. Theory & Psychology, 17(2), 265–295.Google Scholar
  26. Hedegaard, M. (2002). Learning and child development: A cultural-historical study. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(2), 29–37.Google Scholar
  28. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context—James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’ radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Hegel, G. W. F. (1812/1969). Hegel’s science of logic. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  30. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt/M: Campus.Google Scholar
  31. James, W. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green, and co.Google Scholar
  32. Marx, K. (1845). The German ideology, Part I; A: Idealism and materialism: First premises of materialist method. Available at http://www.marx.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm.
  33. McNeil, L. (1988). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Piaget, J. (1957). Logic and psychology. New York: Basic Books INC.Google Scholar
  35. Stetsenko, A. (2004). “Tool and sign in the development of the child”. In R. W. Rieber & D. K. Robinson (Eds.), The essential Vygotsky. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  36. Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Still, A., & Costall, A. (1991). The mutual elimination of dualism in Vygotsky and Gibson. In A. Still & A. Costall (Eds.), Against cognitivism: Alternative foundations for cognitive psychology (pp. 225–236). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  38. Tudge, J. (2008). The everyday lives of young children: Culture, class, and child-rearing in diverse societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tudge, J, Putnam, S., & Valsiner, J. (1990). Culture and cognition in developmental perspective. In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder, & E. J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 190–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Valsiner, J. (2008). Baldwin’s quest: A universal logic of development. In J. Clegg (Ed.), From past to future: Annals in the history of psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In R. R. Cockling & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp. 35–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (1994). The Vygotsky reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards an historical epistemology. In Models-representation and the scientific understanding (pp. 188–210). Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations