Advertisement

Depicting the Dynamics of Living the Life: The Trajectory Equifinality Model

  • Tatsuya Sato
  • Tomo Hidaka
  • Mari Fukuda
Chapter

Abstract

The study of a life course cannot exist without the notion of time. But psychologists and sociologists don't take the notion of time seriously. One of the reasons why they tend to disregard time is that their desire is to seek a depiction that focuses on stability. Actually many of them might "find" the stable structure of personality and stable trail of life course as they construct it through data analyses that are blind to variability and dynamicity. Taking the equifinality principle into account is one of the breakthrough in describing the dynamics. The Trajectory Equifinality Model (TEM) which we describe in this chapter is a new methodological device for psychology. It is based on the systemic view and takes the notion of irreversible time seriously.

Keywords

Structural Equation Model Personality Disorder Bifurcation Point Stage Model Correlational Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbey, E., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Emergence of meanings through ambivalence [58 paragraphs]. FQS: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Article 23, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501231
  2. Bertalanffy, von L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Callero, P. L. (2003). The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cortés, M. (2008, August). A dialogical self—Trajectory equifinality model for higher education first year persistence/abandon study. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference of Dialogical Self. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Daaleman, T. P., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Family medicine and the life course paradigm. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20(1), 85–92. From http://www.jabfm.org/cgi/content/full/20/1/85 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Elder, G. H. (1985). Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course and human development. In R. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical modxels of human development (5th ed., pp. 939–991). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Frank, L. K. (1939). Time perspective. Journal of Philosophy, 4, 293–312.Google Scholar
  10. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “Description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hermans, H. J. M. (1999). Self-narratives as meaning construction: The dynamics of self-investigation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1193–1211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281.Google Scholar
  13. Hermans, H. J. M., & Bonarius H. (1991). The person as co-investigator in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 5, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kawakita, J. (1986). The KJ method: Seeking order out of chaos. Tokyo: Chuokoron-sha. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Kido, A. (in press). Makeup behavior of the use by adolescent female students in the females in different cultural situation settings—Qualitative analysis of subjects in Japan and the USA―Qualitative analysis of interview Japan and U.S.Google Scholar
  17. Kullasepp, K. (2006). Identity construction of psychology students: professional role in the making. European Journal of School Psychology, 4(2), 249–280.Google Scholar
  18. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lerner, R., & Busch-Rossnagel, N. (Eds.). (1981). Individuals as producers of their development: A life- span perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the “Field at a Given Time”. Psychological Review. 50, 292–310. (Republished in Resolving social conflicts & field theory in social science, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997)Google Scholar
  21. Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  22. Macmillan, R., & Eliason, S. (2003). Characterizing the life course as role configurations and pathways: A latent structure approach. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  26. McNemar, Q. (1940). Sampling in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 331–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McQuellon, R. P., Russell, G. B., Rambo, T., Craven, B., Radford, J., Perry, J., et al. (1998). Quality of life and psychological distress of bone marrow transplant recipients: The ‘time trajectory’ to recovery over the first year. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 21, 477–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell, C., Kaufman, C., & Beals, J. (2004). Equifinality and multifinality as guides for preventive interventions: HIV risk/protection among American Indian young adults. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Mori, N. (2009). Methodological issues on two types of TEM study; retrospective and prospective. In T. Sato (Ed.), Starting qualitative study using the TEM as a new method. Tokyo: Seishin-Shobo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nuttin, J., & Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Peirce, C. S. (1908). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [1931–1958 CP 6.475; the first refers to the volum, the number after the dot to the paragraph, and the last number to the year of the text]. C VOl6 of collected paper 475 paragraph, 1908 from http://user.uni-frankfurt.de/~wirth/texte/nubiola.html
  34. Sato, T. (2007). Development, change or transformation: How can psychology conceive and depict professional identify construction? European Journal of School Psychology, 4, 319–332.Google Scholar
  35. Sato, T. (Ed.). (2009). Starting qualitative study using the TEM as a new method. Tokyo, Japan: Seishin-Shobo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  36. Sato, T., Watanabe, Y., & Omi, Y. (2007). Beyond dichotomy—Towards creative synthesis. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41(1), 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sato,T., Yasuda, Y., & Kido, A. (2004, August 12). Historically Structured Sampling (HSS) model: A contribution from cultural psychology. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress of Psychology, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  38. Sato, T., Yasuda, Y., Kido, A., Arakawa, A., Mizoguchi, H., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Sampling reconsidered idiographic science and the analysis of personal life trajectories. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 82–106). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scupin, R. (1997). The KJ method: A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Human Organization, 56, 233–237.Google Scholar
  40. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Tanimura, S., Sato, T., & Tsuchida (2008). Gender role consciousness of the parents which let daughters aim at “The Normal Marriage (a full-time homemaker)”. Ritsumeikan Journal of Human Sciences, 17, 61–74. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  43. Valsiner, J. (1986). Sequence-structure analysis study of serial order within unique sequences of psychological phenomena. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  44. Valsiner, J. (1999). Culture and human development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Valsiner, J. (2001). Comparative study of human cultural development. Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje.Google Scholar
  46. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Valsiner, J. (2009). Facing the future--making the past: The permanent uncertainty of living. In T. Sato (Ed.), Starting qualitative study on the TEM as a new method. Tokyo: Seishin-Shobo. (translated in Japanese)Google Scholar
  48. Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2006). Historically Structured Sampling (HSS): How can psychology´s methodology become tuned in to the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kolbl, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning. Advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 215–251). Bielefeld: Transkript.Google Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wheaton, B., & Gotlib, I. H. (1997). Trajectories and turning points over the life course: Concepts of themes. In I. H. Gotlib & B. Wheaton (Eds.), Stress and adversity over the life course: Trajectories and turning points (pp. 1–25). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamada, Y. & Kato, Y. (2006). Images of circular time and spiral repetition: The generative life cycle model. Culture & Psychology, 12, 143–160.Google Scholar
  52. Yasuda, Y. (2005). Self-reassessment following infertility: Branching selection by couples unable to have children after infertility treatment. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 201–226. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  53. Yasuda, Y., Arakawa, A., Takada, S., Kido, A., & Sato, T. (2008). Young women’s abortion experiences: The influence of social expectation and relationships with others. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 181–203. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRitsumeikan UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations