Abstract
This chapter addresses one so-called ethical aspect of biobanking, namely the relationship between biobanks for research and donors of human biological samples and personal health information. Central to bioethical theory and practice is the institution of informed consent and its potential to create trust. We present results from an observational study of the consent process during the recruitment to a local population DNA bank in Southern France as well as subsequent interviews with donors. Three types of donors were identified: (1) Persons holding a “natural trust” and who were quite uninterested in the information and consent procedure; (2) persons who expressed distrust, but nevertheless participated as donors; and (3) persons who appreciated the consent procedure as a sign of a well-organised institution. Although informed consent may appear partly irrelevant to the issue of trust for a large group of donors, we proceed to discuss the status and desirability of a strong focus on donors’ trust in biobank experts. Indeed, more symmetry and distrust may be a creative potential in the co-production of science and society in the biobank era.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Annas GJ (2001) Reforming informed consent to genetic research. Journal of the American Medical Association 286:2326–2328
Beck U (1992) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Translated from German by Mark Ritter, and with an Introduction by Scott Lash and Brian Wynne. Sage Publications, London
Callon M, Licoppe C (2000) La confiance et ses régimes: quelques leçons tirées de l’histoire des sciences. In: Laufer R, Orillard M (Eds.) La confiance en question. L’harmattan, Paris, pp 133– 154
Callon M et al. (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil, Paris
Cresson G (2000) La confiance dans la relation médecin–patient. In: Cresson G, Schweyer FX (Eds.) Les usagers du système de soins. Editions de l’Ecole Nationale de Santé Publique, Rennes, pp 333–350
Ducournau P (2005) Le consentement à la recherche en épidémiologie génétique: un rituel de confiance en question. Sciences Sociales et Santé 23:5–36
Ducournau P (2006) Au-delà des textes et des procédures juridiques, qu’en est-il des droits de l’usager?. Une étude de cas sur le consentement éclairé et sa procédure de recueil, EMPAN, n◦64, p. 107–112
Ducournau P (2007) The viewpoint of DNA donors on the consent procedure. New Genetics and Society 26:105–116
Durkheim E (1930) La division du travail social. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Frewer L (2003) Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends in Food Science and Technology 14:319–332
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J R (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755
Grossetti M (2004) Sociologie de l’imprévisible. Dynamiques de l’activité et des formes sociales.Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Hansson MG (2005) Building on relationships of trust in biobank research. Journal of Medical Ethics 31:415–418
Harremoës P et al. (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896– 2000. Environmental issue report no. 22. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
Hoeyer K (2003) “Science is really needed – that’s all I know”: informed consent and the nonverbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genetics and Society 22:229–244
Hoeyer K (2006) The power of ethics: a case study from Sweden on the social life of moral concerns in policy processes. Sociology of Health and Illness 28:785–801
Hoeyer K et al. (2004) Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 32:224–229
Hoeyer K et al. (2005) The ethics of research using biobanks – reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine 165:97–100
Memmi D (2001) Surveiller les corps aujourd’hui: un dispositif en mutation? In: Sfez L (Ed.) L’utopie de la santé parfaite. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 173–184
Michael M (1996) Ignoring Science: discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science. In: Wynne B, Irwin A (Eds.) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–125
Moutel G et al. (2001) Bio-libraries and DNA storage: assessment of patient perception of information. Medicine and Law 20:193–204
Nordmann A (2004) Converging technologies – shaping the future of European societies. Report for the European Commission via an expert group on foresighting the new technology wave. European Commission, Brussels
Nowotny H et al. (2001) Rethinking Science.Polity, Cambridge
Pickering A (1995) The Mangle of Practice.The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ravetz J R (2001) Safety paradoxes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 86:1–16
Reardon J (2001) The Humane Genome Diversity Project: A case study in coproduction. Social Studies of Science 31:357–388
Simmel G (1991) Secret et sociétés secrètes. Circé, Paris
Tupasela A (2007) Re-examining medical modernization: framing the public in Finnish biomedical research policy. Public Understanding of Science 16:63–78
Tutton R (2007) Constructing participation in genetic databases – Citizenship, governance, and ambivalence. Science, Technology and Human Values 32:172–195
Tutton R et al. (2004) Governing UK biobank: the importance of ensuring public trust. Trends in Biotechnology 22:284–285
Williams G, Schroeder D (2004) Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent. New Genetics and Society 23:89–103
Wynne B et al. (1996) Misunderstanding Science? The public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Wolpe PR (1998) The triumph of autonomy in American bioethic: a sociological view. In: DeVries R, Sudebi J (Eds.) Bioethics and Society. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 38–59
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ducournau, P., Strand, R. (2009). Trust, Distrust and Co-production: The Relationship Between Research Biobanks and Donors. In: Solbakk, J., Holm, S., Hofmann, B. (eds) The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93871-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93872-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)