Abstract
The role of biobanks is changing to accommodate the expanding needs of the research enterprise. In addition to collecting human specimens, many biobanks also collect research results derived from those specimens.With the advent of technologies to screen the whole genome and the inter-relatedness of multiple genes with multiple diseases, research results will increasingly reveal information with health implications for the contributor of the specimen. What is the responsibility of the biobank to communicate these research findings? What are the benchmarks to guide decision-making on a daily basis? Although there is an emerging ethical imperative from international guidelines to communicate research results to the individual, how should these be implemented in practice? The answers to these questions are highly contextual and currently lack standards of reference. This creates tensions between the traditional boundaries of a biobank, as a resource to store specimens, and the moral intuition of the biobank personnel, as gatekeepers to potentially beneficial health information. This chapter explores these tensions and issues of disclosure of research results in the context of biobanking and provides practice recommendations and next steps for policy development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Annas GJ et al. (1995) Drafting the genetic privacy act: science, policy, and practical considerations. J Law Med Ethics 23:360–366
ASHG (1998) ASHG statement. Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure. Am J Hum Genet 62:474–483
Banks TM (2000) Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects’ access to genetic research results. Sask Law Rev 63:539–580
Bookman EB et al. (2006) Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet A 140:1033–1040
CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research involving human subjects (2002): www.cioms.ch/frameguidelines nov 2002.htm
CLIA (1988) Public Law No. 100–578, C.R.V. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments Stat. 102 (October 31, 1988). Available from: www.fda.gov/CDRH/clia/100-578.pdf [Accessed 5-515-2008]
Council of Europe (2005) Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research: www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/195.htm
Dressler L (1998) Genetic testing for the BRCA1 gene and the need for protection from discrimination: an evolving legislative and social issue. Int J Breast Dis 10:127–135
Dressler L (2005) Human specimens, cancer research and drug development: How science policy can promote progress and protect research participants. Commissioned paper prepared for the National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine and Research Council of the National Academies: www.iom.edu/Object.File/Master/26/207/IOMfnl.pdf
Dressler LG (2007) Disclosure of genetic research results: ethical and regulatory perspective. Meeting abstract. Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R). (October, 2007).
Dressler L, Juengst E (2006) Thresholds and Boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results. Am J Bioethics 6:18–20
Dressler L et al. (1999) Policy guidelines for the utilization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. The UNC SPORE experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 58:31–39
Dugan RB et al. (2003) Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors’ clinical experience. Am J Med Genet 119:27–34
Falk MJ et al. (2003) Medical geneticists’ duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 120:374–380
Gert B (2004) Common Morality: Deciding What To Do. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Grizzle W, Groday W (1999) Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Arch Pathol Lab Med 123:296–300
Hippocrates. The Hippocratic Oath. National Institutes of Health [cited 5–14–2008]: www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greekoath.html
Jewell S et al. (2006) Biospecimen banking, standardization and lessons learned from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Pathology Coordinating Office. Sem Breast Dis 8:93–99
Knoppers BM et al. (2006) The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 14:1170–1178
Lugogo NL et al. (2007) Genetic profiling and tailored therapy in asthma: are we there yet? Curr Opin Mol Ther 9:528–537
Lynch HT et al. (1997) A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results. Cancer 79:2219–2228
Manolio TA (2006) Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: disclosing individual results of genetic research. Am J Bioethics 6:32–34
MRC (2001) Human tissue and biological samples for use in research – operational and ethical guidelines: www.mrc.ac.uk/consumption/idcplg?IdcService=GETFILE&dID=9051&dDocNameMRC002420&allowInterrupt=1
MRC (2004) Human tissue and biological samples for use in research – operational and ethical guidelines: www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002420
NAPBC (1997) Model Consent Forms and Related Information on Tissue Banking and Routine Biopsies,With comments by the PRIM&R and ARENA Tissue BankingWorking Group. Letter to Directors/chairpersons and Members, Institutional Review Boards. Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research. National Action Plan on Breast Cancer, National Cancer Institute. Available at: www.primr.org
NBAC (1999) Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance. Vol. 1: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission: www.bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf
NCI (2007) NCI best practices for biospecimen resources: www.biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/NCIBestPractices060507.pdf
NIH (2008) National Institutes of Health. Public Access Frequently Asked Questions. Available at: www.publicaccess.nih.gov/FAQ.thm?print=yes
Offit K et al. (2004) The “duty to warn” a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risks. JAMA 292:1469–1473
OPPR (1993) Human genetic research: issues to consider: www.ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov
Ossorio PN (2006) Letting the gene out of the bottle: a comment on returning individual research results to participants. Am J Bioethics 6:24–25
Parker LS (2006) Best laid plans for offering results go awry. Am J Bioethics 6:22–23
Parker M, Lucassen A (2003) Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics. J Med Ethics 29:70–73
Pate v. Threlkel (1995) 661 So.2d 278 (Fla.), rehearing denied (October 10, 1995)
Pelias MK (2005) Research in human genetics: the tension between doing no harm and personal autonomy. Clin Genet 67:1–5
Pullman D, Hodgkinson K (2006) Genetic knowledge and moral responsibility: ambiguity at the interface of genetic research and clinical practice. Clin Genet 69:199–203
Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS (2006) Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioethics 6:8–17
Renegar G et al. (2006) Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider. Bioethics 20:24–36
Safer v. Estate of Pack (1996) 291 N.J. Super. 619, 677 A.2d 1188 (N.J. Super.App.Div.)
Schilsky R et al. (2002) Cooperative Group Tissue Bank as Research Resources: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Tissue Repositories. Clinical Cancer Research 8:943–948
UNESCO (2003) International Declaration on Human Genetic Data: UNESCO-the United Nationl Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (October 16, 2003). Available at: www.portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URLID=17720&URLDO=DOTOPIC&URLSECTION-201.html
Wachbroit R (1998) The question not asked: the challenge of pleiotropic genetic tests. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 8:131–144
WHO (2003) Genetic databases: assessing the benefits and impact on human and patient rights [Report]: www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/files/69lauriewhoreportgeneticdatabases03.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dressler, L.G. (2009). Biobanking and Disclosure of Research Results: Addressing the Tension Between Professional Boundaries and Moral Intuition. In: Solbakk, J., Holm, S., Hofmann, B. (eds) The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93871-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93872-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)