Skip to main content

Biobanking and Disclosure of Research Results: Addressing the Tension Between Professional Boundaries and Moral Intuition

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Research Biobanking

Abstract

The role of biobanks is changing to accommodate the expanding needs of the research enterprise. In addition to collecting human specimens, many biobanks also collect research results derived from those specimens.With the advent of technologies to screen the whole genome and the inter-relatedness of multiple genes with multiple diseases, research results will increasingly reveal information with health implications for the contributor of the specimen. What is the responsibility of the biobank to communicate these research findings? What are the benchmarks to guide decision-making on a daily basis? Although there is an emerging ethical imperative from international guidelines to communicate research results to the individual, how should these be implemented in practice? The answers to these questions are highly contextual and currently lack standards of reference. This creates tensions between the traditional boundaries of a biobank, as a resource to store specimens, and the moral intuition of the biobank personnel, as gatekeepers to potentially beneficial health information. This chapter explores these tensions and issues of disclosure of research results in the context of biobanking and provides practice recommendations and next steps for policy development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Annas GJ et al. (1995) Drafting the genetic privacy act: science, policy, and practical considerations. J Law Med Ethics 23:360–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASHG (1998) ASHG statement. Professional disclosure of familial genetic information. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure. Am J Hum Genet 62:474–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks TM (2000) Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects’ access to genetic research results. Sask Law Rev 63:539–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bookman EB et al. (2006) Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet A 140:1033–1040

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research involving human subjects (2002): www.cioms.ch/frameguidelines nov 2002.htm

  • CLIA (1988) Public Law No. 100–578, C.R.V. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments Stat. 102 (October 31, 1988). Available from: www.fda.gov/CDRH/clia/100-578.pdf [Accessed 5-515-2008]

  • Council of Europe (2005) Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research: www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/195.htm

  • Dressler L (1998) Genetic testing for the BRCA1 gene and the need for protection from discrimination: an evolving legislative and social issue. Int J Breast Dis 10:127–135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler L (2005) Human specimens, cancer research and drug development: How science policy can promote progress and protect research participants. Commissioned paper prepared for the National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine and Research Council of the National Academies: www.iom.edu/Object.File/Master/26/207/IOMfnl.pdf

  • Dressler LG (2007) Disclosure of genetic research results: ethical and regulatory perspective. Meeting abstract. Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R). (October, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler L, Juengst E (2006) Thresholds and Boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results. Am J Bioethics 6:18–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler L et al. (1999) Policy guidelines for the utilization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. The UNC SPORE experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 58:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan RB et al. (2003) Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors’ clinical experience. Am J Med Genet 119:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk MJ et al. (2003) Medical geneticists’ duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 120:374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gert B (2004) Common Morality: Deciding What To Do. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grizzle W, Groday W (1999) Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Arch Pathol Lab Med 123:296–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hippocrates. The Hippocratic Oath. National Institutes of Health [cited 5–14–2008]: www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greekoath.html

  • Jewell S et al. (2006) Biospecimen banking, standardization and lessons learned from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Pathology Coordinating Office. Sem Breast Dis 8:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers BM et al. (2006) The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 14:1170–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lugogo NL et al. (2007) Genetic profiling and tailored therapy in asthma: are we there yet? Curr Opin Mol Ther 9:528–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch HT et al. (1997) A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results. Cancer 79:2219–2228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manolio TA (2006) Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: disclosing individual results of genetic research. Am J Bioethics 6:32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • MRC (2001) Human tissue and biological samples for use in research – operational and ethical guidelines: www.mrc.ac.uk/consumption/idcplg?IdcService=GETFILE&dID=9051&dDocNameMRC002420&allowInterrupt=1

  • MRC (2004) Human tissue and biological samples for use in research – operational and ethical guidelines: www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002420

  • NAPBC (1997) Model Consent Forms and Related Information on Tissue Banking and Routine Biopsies,With comments by the PRIM&R and ARENA Tissue BankingWorking Group. Letter to Directors/chairpersons and Members, Institutional Review Boards. Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research. National Action Plan on Breast Cancer, National Cancer Institute. Available at: www.primr.org

  • NBAC (1999) Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance. Vol. 1: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission: www.bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf

  • NCI (2007) NCI best practices for biospecimen resources: www.biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/NCIBestPractices060507.pdf

  • NIH (2008) National Institutes of Health. Public Access Frequently Asked Questions. Available at: www.publicaccess.nih.gov/FAQ.thm?print=yes

  • Offit K et al. (2004) The “duty to warn” a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risks. JAMA 292:1469–1473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OPPR (1993) Human genetic research: issues to consider: www.ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov

  • Ossorio PN (2006) Letting the gene out of the bottle: a comment on returning individual research results to participants. Am J Bioethics 6:24–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker LS (2006) Best laid plans for offering results go awry. Am J Bioethics 6:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker M, Lucassen A (2003) Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics. J Med Ethics 29:70–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pate v. Threlkel (1995) 661 So.2d 278 (Fla.), rehearing denied (October 10, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelias MK (2005) Research in human genetics: the tension between doing no harm and personal autonomy. Clin Genet 67:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman D, Hodgkinson K (2006) Genetic knowledge and moral responsibility: ambiguity at the interface of genetic research and clinical practice. Clin Genet 69:199–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS (2006) Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioethics 6:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renegar G et al. (2006) Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider. Bioethics 20:24–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safer v. Estate of Pack (1996) 291 N.J. Super. 619, 677 A.2d 1188 (N.J. Super.App.Div.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilsky R et al. (2002) Cooperative Group Tissue Bank as Research Resources: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Tissue Repositories. Clinical Cancer Research 8:943–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003) International Declaration on Human Genetic Data: UNESCO-the United Nationl Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (October 16, 2003). Available at: www.portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URLID=17720&URLDO=DOTOPIC&URLSECTION-201.html

  • Wachbroit R (1998) The question not asked: the challenge of pleiotropic genetic tests. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 8:131–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2003) Genetic databases: assessing the benefits and impact on human and patient rights [Report]: www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/files/69lauriewhoreportgeneticdatabases03.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dressler, L.G. (2009). Biobanking and Disclosure of Research Results: Addressing the Tension Between Professional Boundaries and Moral Intuition. In: Solbakk, J., Holm, S., Hofmann, B. (eds) The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93871-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93872-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics