Abstract
In the discussion of ethical issues concerning databases as resources for population research, two main positions have been predominant. On the one hand, a major emphasis has been on protecting the participants from being discriminated against or having their privacy violated. The other main emphasis has been on the substantial benefits that can be reaped from the research. I show how these often conflicting positions share an important underlying and hidden presumption, implying a too narrow vision of the citizen as a passive participant. I argue that it is important to explore alternative visions of the citizens in relation to population database research. For this purpose, I ask whether recent ideas of deliberative democracy and scientific citizenship provide us with a viable guiding vision of how to facilitate a more active and informed public engagement in database research society. I flesh out my ideas in terms of the debate about consent for participation in database research and show how different models of consent imply different visions of the citizen. I argue that a dynamic authorization model with an opt-out clause could contribute to conditions for more informed, active and critically aware citizens.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arblaster A (1987) Democracy. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Árnason V (2004) Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 18:27–49
Árnason V, Hjo¨rleifsson S (2007) Geneticization and bioethics: advancing debate and research. Med Health Care Philos 10:417–431
Árnason V, Hjo¨rleifsson S (2008) Population databanks and democracy in light of the Icelandic experience. In: Launis V, Rä ikkä J (Eds.) Genetic Democracy. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 93–104
Benhabib S (1996) Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In: Benhabib S (Ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 67–94
Caulfield T et al. (2003) DNA databanks and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model. BMC Med Ethics 4:1
Cohen J (1997) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: Bohman J, RehgW(Eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA, pp 67–91
Foucault M (1980) Two lectures. Lecture two. In: Gordon C (Ed.) Power/Knowledge. The Harvester Press, Brighton, pp 92–108
Greely H (1999) Breaking the stalemate: a prospective regulatory framework for unforeseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information. Wake Forest Law Rev 34:737–766
Greely H (2000) Iceland’s plan for genomics research: facts and implications. Jurimetrics 40:153– 191
Gulcher J, Stef´ansson K (2000) The Icelandic healthcare database and informed consent. N Engl J Med 342:1827–1830
Hoeyer K et al. (2004) Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand J Public Health 32:224–229
Hoeyer KL, Tutton R (2005) ‘Ethics was here’: studying the language-games of ethics in the case of UK biobank. Crit Public Health 15:385–397
Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10:1–18
Kaye J (2004) Broad consent — the only option for population genetic databases. In: Árnason G et al. (Eds.) Blood and Data: Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases. University of Iceland Press, Reykjav´ık, pp 103–109
Kristinsson S (2006) Autonomy and informed consent: a mistaken association? Med Health Care Philos 10:253–264
Kristinsson S, Árnason V (2007) Informed consent and human genetic database research. In: Hä yry M et al. (Eds.) The Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic Databases: European Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–216
Marshall TH (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
O’Neill O (2001) Informed consent and genetic information. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 32:689–704
Rose H (2001) The Commodification of Bioinformation: The Icelandic Health Sector Database. The Wellcome Trust.
Rose N, Novas C (2005) Biological citizenship. In: Ong A, Collier SJ (Eds.) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 439–463
Sandel M (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Árnason, V. (2009). Scientific Citizenship, Benefit, and Protection in Population-Based Research. In: Solbakk, J., Holm, S., Hofmann, B. (eds) The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93872-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93871-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93872-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)