Smart Offices and Intelligent Decision Rooms

  • Carlos Ramos
  • Goreti Marreiros
  • Ricardo Santos
  • Carlos Filipe Freitas


Nowadays computing technology research is focused on the development of Smart Environments. Following that line of thought several Smart Rooms projects were developed and their appliances are very diversified. The appliances include projects in the context of workplace or everyday living, entertainment, play and education. These appliances envisage to acquire and apply knowledge about the environment state in order to reason about it so as to define a desired state for its inhabitants and perform adaptation adaptation to these desires and therefore improving their involvement and satisfaction with that environment.


Group Decision Participant Agent Ambient Intelligence Meeting Room Microphone Array 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Analide C, Neves J (2002) Antropopatia em entidades virtuais. In: I Workshop de Teses e Dissertacoes em Inteligencia Artificial (WTDIA02), BrazilGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Andrade F, Neves J, Novais P, Machado J, Abelha A (2005) Collaborative Networks and Their Breeding nvironments, Springer-Verlag, chap Legal Security and Credibility in Agent Based Virtual Enterprises, pp 501–512Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Asadi M, Huber M (2004) State space reduction for hierarchical reinforcement learning. In: FLAIRS ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Brard F (1994) Vision par ordinateur pour la ralit augmente : Application au bureau numrique. PhD thesis, Université Joseph Fourier, JuneGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Brooks RA, Dang D, Bonet JD, Kramer J, Mellor J, Pook P, Stauffer C, Stein L, Torrance M, Wessler M (1997) The intelligent room project. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Cognitive Technology Conference (CT’97), pp 271–278Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chen F, Gao Y, Chen S, Ma Z (2007) Connect-based subgoal discovery for options in hierarchical reinforcement learning. 3th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC 2007) 4:698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cook DJ, Das SK (2007) How smart are our environments? an updated look at the state of the art. Pervasive Mobile Computing 3(2):53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Davidsson P (2001) Multi agent based simulation: beyond social simulation. In: MABS 2000: Proceedings of the second international workshop on Multi-agent based simulation, Springer-Verlag, USA, pp 97–107Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dodier R, Y DL, Riesz J, Mozer MC (1994) Comparison of neural net and conventional techniques for lighting control. applied mathematics and computer science. Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 4:447–462Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fillinger A (Accessed in June 2008) The nist mark-iii microphone array.
  11. [11]
    Fillinger A (Accessed in June 2008) The nist smart space project.
  12. [12]
    Frank R (2000) Understanding smart sensors. Measurement Science and Technology 11(12):1830, URL
  13. [13]
    Freitas C, Marreiros G, Ramos C (2007) IGTAI - An Idea Generation Tool for Ambient Intelligence. In: 3rd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments, pp 391–397, Ulm, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Goel S, Huber M (2003) Subgoal discovery for hierarchical reinforcement learning using learned policies. In: FLAIRS Conference, pp 346–350Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Grudin J (2002) Group dynamics and ubiquitous computing. Commun ACM 45(12):74–78, CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Heider T, Kirste T (2002) Intelligent environment lab. Computer Graphics Topics 15(2):8–10Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Huber GP (1982) Group decision support systems as aids in the use of structured group management techniques. In: Proc. of second international conference on decision support systemsGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Huber GP (1984) Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Huber M (2005) Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols and Applications, Wiley, chap Automated Decision MakingGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Johanson B, Fox A, Winograd T (2002) The interactive workspaces project: Experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1(2):67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kang YB, Pisan Y (2006) A survey of major challenges and future directions for next generation pervasive computing. In: Computer and Information Sciences, ISCIS 2006, vol 4263/2006, pp 755–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Karacapilidis N, Papadias D (2001) Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the hermes system. Infor Syst 26(4):259–277MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Kraus S, Sycara K, Evenchik A (1998) Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104:1–69MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kulkarni A (2002) Design Principles of a Reactive Behavioral S ystem for the Intelligent Room. Bitstream: The MIT Journal of EECS Student ResearchGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Le Gal C (2005) Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols and Applications, Wiley, chap Smart OfficesGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Le Gal C, Martin J, Lux A, Crowley J (2001) Smartoffice: design of an intelligent environment. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(4):60–66, DOI 10.1109/5254.941359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Lewis L (1982) Facilitator: A microcomputer decision support systems for small groups. PhD thesis, University of LouisvilleGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Marreiros G, Sousa J, Ramos C (2004) Webmeeting - a group decision support system for multi-criteria decision problems. In: International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Decision Support, Porto, Portugal, pp 63–70Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Marreiros G, Ramos C, Neves J (2005) Dealing with emotional factors in agent based ubiquitous group decision. LNCS 3823:41–50Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Marreiros G, Ramos C, Neves J (2006) Multi-agent approach to group decision making through persuasive argumentation. In: 6th International Conference on Argumentation ISSA 2006Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Marreiros G, Santos R, Ramos C, Neves J, Novais P, Machado J, Bulas-Cruz J (2007) Ambient intelligence in emotion based ubiquitous decision making. In: Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Ambient Intelligence, IJCAI 07, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Marreiros G, Santos R, Freitas C, Ramos C, Neves J, Bulas-Cruz J (2008) Laid - a smart decision room with ambient intelligence for group decision making and argumentation support considering emotional aspects. International Journal of Smart Home 2(2):77–94Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Marsa-Maestre I, de la Hoz E, Alarcos B, Velasco JR (2006) A hierarchical, agent-based approach to security in smart offices. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (ICUC-2006)Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Marsa-Maestre I, Lopez-Carmona MA, Velasco JR, Navarro A (2008) Mobile agents for service personalization in smart environments. Journal of Networks (JNW) 3(5):30–41Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Mikic I, Huang K, Trivedi M (2000) Activity monitoring and summarization for an intelligent meeting room. In: Workshop on Human Motion, pp 107–112Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Minder D, Marrón PJ, Lachenmann A, Rothermel K (2005) Experimental construction of a meeting model for smart office environments. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2005)Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Mitchell TM (1997) Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill Higher EducationGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Moore D (2002) The idiap smart meeting room. IDIAP-COM 07, IDIAPGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Neves J (1984) A logic interpreter to handle time and negation in logic data bases. In: ACM 84: Proceedings of the 1984 annual conference of the ACM on The fifth generation challenge, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 50–54, DOI Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Nijholt A (2004) Meetings, gatherings, and events in smart environments. In: ACM SIGGRAPH international Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in industry, pp 229–232Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Nunamaker JF, Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Vogel D, George JF (1991) Electronic meeting systems. Commun ACM 34(7):40–61, DOI Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman DD, Vogel DR, Balthazard PA (1996) Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. Journal Management Information Systems 13(3):163–207Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    O’Keefe D (1990) Persuasion: Theory and Research. SAGE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Osborn AF (1963) Applied Imagination 3rd ed. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Petzold J, Bagci F, Trumler W, Ungerer T, Vintan L (2004) Global state context prediction techniques applied to a smart office building. In: Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation Conference, USAGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Petzold J, Bagci F, Trumler W, Ungere T (2005) Next location prediction within a smart office building. In: Gellersen HW, Want R, Schmidt A (eds) Third International Conference PERVASIVE 2005, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Prante T, Stenzel R, Röcker C, Streitz N, Magerkurth C (2004) Ambient agoras: Inforiver, siam, hello.wall. In: CHI ’04: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, NY, USA, pp 763–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Pruitt DG (1981) Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Ramos C, Augusto JC, Shapiro D (2008) Ambient intelligence - the next step for artificial intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems 23(2):15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Russell SJ, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USAMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Salancik G, Pfeffer J (1977) Who gets power and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics 5:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Santos R, Marreiros G, Ramos C, Neves J, Bulas-Cruz J (2006) Multi-agent Approach for Ubiquitous Group Decision Support Involving Emotions, LNCS, vol 4159, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, chap Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, pp 1174–1185Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Satyanarayanan M (2001) Pervasive computing: vision and challenges. Personal Communications, IEEE [see also IEEE Wireless Communications] 8(4):10–17Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Shrobe DHE (Accessed in June 2008) Intelligent room project.
  55. [55]
    Stanford V, Garofolo J, Galibert O, Michel M, Laprun C (2003) The (nist) smart space and meeting room projects: signals, acquisition annotation, and metrics. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP ’03). 2003, vol 4, pp 6–10Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Streitz NA, Röcker C, Prante T, van Alphen D, Stenzel R, Magerkurth C (2005) Designing smart artifacts for smart environments. Computer 38(3):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Trumler W, Bagci F, Petzold J, Ungerer T (2003) Smart doorplate. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 7(3-4):221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Waibel A, Schultz T, Bett M, Denecke M, Malkin R, Rogina I, Stiefelhagen R, Yang J (2003) Smart: the smart meeting room task at ISL. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp 281–286Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Want R, Hopper A, Falcao V, Gibbons J (1992) The active badge location system. ACM Transactions Information Systems 10(1):91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Weiser M (1991) The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American 265(3):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Wellner P (1991) The digitaldesk calculator: tangible manipulation on a desk top display. In: UIST ’91: Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, NY, USA, pp 27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Yuizono T, Munemori J, Nagasawa Y (1998) Gungen: groupware for a new idea eneration consistent support system. In: Proceedings 3rd Asia Pacific on Computer Human Interaction, pp 357–362Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Zachary W, Ryder J (1997) Handbook Of Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science, chap Decision Support Systems: Integrating Decision Aiding and Decision Training, pp 1235–1258Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Zimmermann HJ (1999) Practical Applications of Fuzzy Technologies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USAMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GECAD and ISEPPortugal
  2. 2.GECAD and ESTGFPortugal
  3. 3.GECADPortugal

Personalised recommendations