Skip to main content

Learning Activity Models for Multiple Agents in a Smart Space

  • Chapter
Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments

Abstract

With the introduction of more complex intelligent environment systems, the possibilities for customizing system behavior have increased dramatically. Significant headway has been made in tracking individuals through spaces using wireless devices [1, 18, 26] and in recognizing activities within the space based on video data (see chapter by Brubaker et al. and [6, 8, 23]), motion sensor data [9, 25], wearable sensors [13] or other sources of information [14, 15, 22]. However, much of the theory and most of the algorithms are designed to handle one individual in the space at a time. Resident tracking, activity recognition, event prediction, and behavior automation becomes significantly more difficult for multi-agent situations, when there are multiple residents in the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Bahl and V. Padmanabhan. Radar: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, pages 775–784, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Brdiczka, P. Reignier, and J. Crowley. Detecting individual activities from video in a smart home. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pages 363–370, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Colley and P. Stacey. Agent association group negotiation within intelligent environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Cook and S. K. Das. How smart are our environments? an updated look at the state of the art. Journal of Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 3(2):53–73, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Diehl, M. Marsiske, A. Horgas, A. Rosenberg, J. Saczynski, and S. Willis. The revised observed activities of daily living: A performance-based assessment of everyday problem solving in older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(3):211–230, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Feng, J. Walpole, W. Feng, , and C. Pu. Moving towards massively scalable video-based sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on New Visions for Large-Scale Networks: Research and Applications, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Hightower and G. Borriello. Location systems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Computer, 32(8):57–66, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. S. Intille. Designing a home of the future. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1:80–86, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Jakkula, A. Crandall, and D. J. Cook. Knowledge discovery in entity based smart environment resident data using temporal relations based data mining. In Proceedings of the ICDM Workshop on Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Data Mining, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Krumm, S. Harris, B. Meyers, B. Brumitt, M. Hale, and S. Shafer. Multi-camera multi-person tracking for easyliving. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance, pages 3–10, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Lin and L. Fu. Multi-user preference model and service provision in a smart home environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, pages 759–764, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Lu, Y. Ho, and L. Fu. Creating robust activity maps using wireless sensor network in a smart home. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U. Maurer, A. Smailagic, D. Siewiorek, and M. Deisher. Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Moncrieff. Multi-modal emotive computing in a smart house environment. Journal of Pervasive and Mobile Computing, special issue on Design and Use of Smart Environments (to appear), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Orr and G. D. Abowd. The smart floor: A mechanism for natural user identification and tracking. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Netherlands, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. B. Patterson and J. L. Mack. The cleveland scale for activities of daily living (csadl): Its reliability and validity. Journal of Clinical Gerontology, 7:15–28, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Philipose, K. P. Fishkin, M. Perkowitz, D. J. Patterson, D. Hahnel, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(4):50–57, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Priyantha, A. Chakraborty, and H. Balakrishnan. The cricket location support system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages pages 32–43, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Rashidi and D. Cook. Adapting to resident preferences in smart environments. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Reisberg, S. Finkel, J. Overall, N. Schmidt-Gollas, S. Kanowski, H. Lehfeld, F. Hulla, S. G. Sclan, H.-U. Wilms, K. Heininger, I. Hindmarch, M. Stemmler, L. Poon, A. Kluger, C. Cooler, M. Bergener, L. Hugonot-Diener, P. H. Robert, and H. Erzigkeit. The Alzheimer’s disease activities of daily living international scale. International Psychogeriatrics, 13:163–181, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Roy, A. Roy, K. Basu, and S. K. Das. A cooperative learning framework for mobility-aware resource management in multi-inhabitant smart homes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services (MobiQuitous), pages 393–403, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Sanchez, M. Tentori, and J. Favela. Activity recognition for the smart hospital. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(2):50–57, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Snidaro, C. Micheloni, and C. Chivedale. Video security for ambient intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A:Systems and Humans, 35:133–144, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. van Kasteren and B. Krose. Bayesian activity recognition in residence for elders. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Wren and E. Munguia Tapia. Toward scalable activity recognition for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Location and Context-Awareness, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Yin, Q. Yang, and D. Shen. Activity recognition via user-trace segmentation. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aaron Crandall or Diane J. Cook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crandall, A., Cook, D.J. (2010). Learning Activity Models for Multiple Agents in a Smart Space. In: Nakashima, H., Aghajan, H., Augusto, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93808-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93808-0_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93807-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93808-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics