Skip to main content

Creating Process and Policy Change in Healthcare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1072 Accesses

Abstract

The word “policy” is often bantered about and it is assumed that everyone has or uses a fundamental definition for policy and hence, policy development. In broad terms, policy can refer simply to a “plan of action” or “statement of aims or goals.” However defined, it is then difficult to interpret who is involved in policy planning and what are the key functions of policy development, policy implementation and subsequent evaluation. To better understand some of these nuances, William Jenkins defines policy as a set of incremental decisions taken by a political figure or group regarding the prioritization of goals and the means to achieve these goals. James Anderson describes public policy as a purposive course of action aimed at dealing with a problem identified by the government. These begin to capture some of the key elements of public policymaking and the inherent link to government as a key player in policy development and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Letherman S, Sutherland K. Designing national quality reforms: a framework for action. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimkhada R, Peabody JW, Quimbo SA, Solon O. The quality improvement demonstration study: an example of evidence-based policy-making in practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008;6:5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies P. Policy evaluation in the United Kingdom. In: KDI International Policy Evaluation Forum, Seoul, Korea; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berwick D. The science of improvement. JAMA. 2008;299(10):1182–1184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGloin H, Adam S, Singer M. The quality of pre-ICU care influences outcome of patients admitted from the ward. Clin Intensive Care. 1997;8:104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A, et al. Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ. 1998;316(7148):1853–1858.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schein RM, Hazday N, Pena M, Ruben BH, Sprung CL. Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Chest. 1990;98(6):1388–1392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buist MD, Jarmolowski E, Burton PR, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson J. Recognizing clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive e care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Med J Aust. 1999;171(1):22–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–1377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tyan B, Gross NC. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol. 1943;8:15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Soumerai S, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, et al. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1998;279(17):1358–1363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dodgson M, Bessant J. Effective Innovation Policy: A New Approach. New York: Routledge; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones D, Bellomo R, Bates S, et al. Long-term effect of a medical emergency team on cardiac arrests in a teaching hospital. Crit Care. 2005;9:R808–R815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MERIT Study Investigators. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9477):2091–2097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reynolds S. Sustainability of RRS presentation.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart F. Reynolds .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, S.F., Lawless, B. (2011). Creating Process and Policy Change in Healthcare. In: DeVita, M., Hillman, K., Bellomo, R. (eds) Textbook of Rapid Response Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92853-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92853-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-92852-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-92853-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics