The Role of Rigid Fiberoptic Laryngoscopes

  • Richard M. Cooper


Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has seen no substantive advances since its introduction by Janeway [1] or modifications by Miller [2] and Macintosh [3]. The difficulty in seeing around the corner beyond the tip of the laryngoscope blade has been a persistent challenge in a limited, but often unpredicted group of patients. The new possibilities offered by fiberoptics and embedded miniature video cameras may enable us to overcome many of the limitations of the direct line-of-sight.


Direct Laryngoscopy Double Lumen Tube Video Laryngoscope Suction Catheter Laryngoscope Blade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Janeway HH. Intra-tracheal anesthesia from the standpoint of the nose, throat and oral surgeon with a description of a new instrument for catheterizing the trachea. Laryngoscope. 1913;23(11):1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller RA. A new laryngoscope. Anesthesiology. 1941;2(3):317–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Macintosh RR. New inventions. A new laryngoscope. Lancet. 1943;1(6):205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bannister FB, Macbeth RB. Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Lancet. 1944;1:651–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adnet F, Borron SW, Lapostolle F, Lapandry C. The three axis alignment theory and the “sniffing position”: perpetuation of an anatomic myth? Anesthesiology. 1999;91(6):1964–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hochman II, Zeitels SM, Heaton JT. Analysis of the forces and position required for direct laryngoscopic exposure of the anterior vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(8):715–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levitan RM, Mechem CC, Ochroch EA, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Head-elevated laryngoscopy position: improving laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy by increasing head elevation. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(3):322–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adnet F, Borron SW, Dumas JL, Lapostolle F, Cupa M, Lapandry C. Study of the “sniffing position” by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(1):83–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, et al. Randomized study comparing the “sniffing position” with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(4):836–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crosby ET, Cooper RM, Douglas MJ, et al. The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(8):757–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rose DK, Cohen MM. The incidence of airway problems depends on the definition used. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43(1):30–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):429–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(6):1290–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adnet F, Racine SX, Borron SW, et al. A survey of tracheal intubation difficulty in the operating room: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(3):327–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(5 Pt 1):372–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(2):607–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenblatt WH, Wagner PJ, Ovassapian A, Kain ZN. Practice patterns in managing the difficult airway by anesthesiologists in the United States. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(1):153–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkins K, Wong DT, Correa R. Management choices for the difficult airway by anesthesiologists in Canada. Can J Anesth. 2002;49(8):850–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ezri T, Szmuk P, Warters RD, Katz J, Hagberg CA. Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States: have we made any progress? J Clin Anesth. 2003;15(6):418–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cooper RM, Law JA, Hung O, Murphy MF, Law JA. Rigid and semi-rigid fiberoptic and video-laryngoscopy and intubation. Management of the difficult and failed airway. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2007.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeo V, Chung DC, Hin LY. A bougie improves the utility of the Upsherscope. J Clin Anesth. 1999;11(6):471–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pearce AC, Shaw S, Macklin S. Evaluation of the Upsherscope. A new rigid fibrescope. Anaesthesia. 1996;51(6):561–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fridrich P, Frass M, Krenn CG, Weinstabl C, Benumof JL, Krafft P. The UpsherScope in routine and difficult airway management: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 1997;85(6):1377–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu TL, Chou HC. A new laryngoscope: the combination intubating device. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(4):1085–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Law JA, Hagberg CA. The evolution of upper airway retraction: new and old laryngoscope blades. Benumof’s airway management principles and practice, vol. 2. Philadelphia PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 532–75.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sprung J, Weingarten T, Dilger J. The use of WuScope fiberoptic laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in complex clinical situations. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(1):263–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith CE, Sidhu TS, Lever J, Pinchak AB. The complexity of tracheal intubation using rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy (WuScope). Anesth Analg. 1999;89(1):236–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith CE, Pinchak AB, Sidhu TS, Radesic BP, Pinchak AC, Hagen JF. Evaluation of tracheal intubation difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: fiberoptic (WuScope) versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(5):1253–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davies S, Ananthanarayan C, Castro C. Asymptomatic lingual tonsillar hypertrophy and difficult airway management: a report of three cases. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48(10):1020–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ovassapian A, Glassenberg R, Randel GI, Mesnick PS, Klafta JM. Difficult airways because of lingual tonsil hyperplasia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:A1214.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crosby E, Skene D. More on lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. Can J Anesth. 2002;49(7):758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ovassapian A, Glassenberg R, Randel GI, Klock A, Mesnick PS, Klafta JM. The unexpected difficult airway and lingual tonsil hyperplasia: a case series and a review of the literature. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(1):124–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Al Shamaa M, Jefferson P, Ball DR. Lingual tonsil hypertrophy: airway management. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(11):1134–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tokumine J, Sugahara K, Ura M, Takara I, Oshiro M, Owa T. Lingual tonsil hypertrophy with difficult airway and uncontrollable bleeding. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(4):390–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Andrews SR, Mabey MF. Tubular fiberoptic laryngoscope (WuScope) and lingual tonsil airway obstruction. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(3):904–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andrews SR, Norcross SD, Mabey MF, Siegel JB. The WuScope technique for endotracheal tube exchange. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(3):929–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sprung J, Wright LC, Dilger J. Use of WuScope for exchange of endotracheal tube in a patient with difficult airway. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(6):1082–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Crosby ET, Cleland MJ. Bullard laryngoscope: keeping its act together. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(1):266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Katsnelson T, Farcon E, Schwalbe SS, Badola R. The Bullard laryngoscope and the right arytenoid. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(6):552–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Katsnelson T, Farcon E, Cosio M, Schwalbe SS. The Bullard laryngoscope and size of the endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(1):261–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cooper SD, Benumof JL, Ozaki GT. Evaluation of the Bullard laryngoscope using the new intubating stylet: comparison with conventional laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1994;79(5):965–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    MacQuarrie K, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation using Bullard laryngoscope for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(8):760–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gorback MS. Management of the challenging airway with the Bullard laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 1991;3(6):473–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Connelly NR, Ghandour K, Robbins L, Dunn S, Gibson C. Management of unexpected difficult airway at a teaching institution over a 7-year period. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(3):198–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cohn AI, Zornow MH. Awake endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine disease: a comparison of the Bullard laryngoscope and the fiberoptic bronchoscope. Anesth Analg. 1995;81(6):1283–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cohn AI, Hart RT, McGraw SR, Blass NH. The Bullard laryngoscope for emergency airway management in a morbidly obese parturient. Anesth Analg. 1995;81(4):872–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wahlen BM, Gercek E. Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard laryngoscopes, the bonfils fibrescope and the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(11):907–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shulman GB, Connelly NR. A comparison of the Bullard laryngoscope versus the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope during intubation in patients afforded inline stabilization. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13(3):182–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Abrams KJ, Desai N, Katsnelson T. Bullard laryngoscopy for trauma airway management in ­suspected cervical spine injuries. Anesth Analg. 1992;74(4):623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shulman GB, Connelly NR. Double lumen tube placement with the Bullard laryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46(3):232–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miceli L, Cecconi M, Tripi G, Zauli M, Della Rocca G. Evaluation of new laryngoscope blade for tracheal intubation, Truview EVO2: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25(6):446–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Barak M, Philipchuck P, Abecassis P, Katz Y. A comparison of the TruviewR blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(8):827–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li JB, Xiong YC, Wang XL, et al. An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(9):940–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2(R), Glidescope(R), and Airwayscope(R) laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(5):723–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiaUniversity of Toronto, Toronto General HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesia and Pain ManagementOntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations