Abstract
Airway management in the pre-hospital setting poses a unique set of challenges. While elective management of a patient’s airway is typically performed in a controlled environment by experienced clinicians, circumstances in the pre-hospital setting are often much different than that in the operating room or even the Emergency Department. As seen in Figs. 15.1 and 15.2, patient care happens in a wide variety of surroundings including accident scenes, private residences, and in Emergency Medical Service vehicles. Often, there are challenges to the rapid establishment of an adequate airway in ill or injured patients. This can include entrapped or difficult to access patients, unsafe or hostile settings, and psychomotor challenges such as having to perform procedures in the back of a moving ambulance or helicopter. In addition, pre-hospital airway management often happens in the setting of an acute, decompensated medical condition coupled with an increased risk of regurgitation with impaired protective reflexes. In contrast to the controlled inpatient location, patients are frequently in a state of cardiovascular collapse, respiratory distress, or suffering from polytrauma. It is estimated that difficult intubating conditions are encountered in approximately 7–10 % of patients requiring airway management in the pre-hospital setting [1, 2]. It is unclear whether these numbers are truly reflective of the dimension of the problem. In recent studies evaluating the incidence of adverse events during pre-hospital airway management by paramedics in patients with severe head injuries, it was noted that complications frequently occur. In one study, 31 (57 %) of 54 patients demonstrated desaturation during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Six (19 %) patients experienced marked bradycardia (HR <50 beats/min) during these desaturation events [3]. It is in this context that we wish to discuss the evaluation, approach, and management of the difficult airway.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Combitube is more appropriately regarded as an “extraglottic” airway device though we are herein referring to as a “supraglottic” device for the purposes of not introducing a new category.
References
Gerich TG, et al. Pre-hospital airway management in the acutely injured patient: the role of surgical crichothyrotomy revisited. J Trauma. 1998;45(2):312–4.
Adnet F, et al. Survey of out-of-hospital emergency intubations in the French pre-hospital medical system: a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(4):454–60.
Sakles J, et al. Training with video imaging improves the initial intubation success rates of paramedic trainees in an operating room setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(1):46–50.
United States Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. EMT-Basic: National Standard Curriculum.
United States Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. EMT-Paramedic: National Standard Curriculum.
Cummins R, et al. Ventilation skills of emergency medical technicians: a teaching challenged for emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:1187–92.
Bobrow et al. Passive oxygen insufflation is superior to bag-valve-mask ventilation for witnessed ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. Online: 7 Aug 2009.
Staudinger T, et al. Emergency intubation with the combitube: comparison with the endotracheal airway. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22(10):1573–5.
Lefrancois D, et al. Use of the esophageal tracheal combitube by basic emergency medical technicians. Resuscitation. 2002;52:77–83.
Davis D, et al. The combitube as a salvage airway device for paramedic rapid sequence intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(5):697–704.
Tanigawa K, et al. Chose of airway devices for 12,020 cases of nontraumatic cardiac arrest in Japan. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998;2(2):96–100.
Rumball CJ, et al. The PTL, Combitube, laryngeal mask and oral airway: a randomized pre-hospital comparative study of ventilatory effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in 470 cases of cardiorespiratory arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997;1(1):1–10.
Vezina MC, et al. Complications associated with the esophageal-tracheal Combitube® in the pre-hospital setting. Can J Anesth. 2007;54(2):124–8.
Ochs M, et al. Successful pre-hospital airway management by EMT-Ds using the combitube. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;4:333–7.
Calkins T, et al. Success and complication rates with pre-hospital placement of an esophageal-tracheal combitube as a rescue airway. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;23:97–100.
Deakin C, et al. Securing the pre-hospital airway: a comparison of laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation by UK paramedics. Emerg Med J. 2005;22:64–7.
Doerges V, et al. Airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation—a comparative study of bag-valve-mask, laryngeal mask airway and combitube in a bench model. Resuscitation. 1999;41:63–9.
Chen L, Hsiao A. Randomized trial of endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in simulated pre-hospital pediatric arrest. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e294–7.
Levitan R, et al. Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway by medical and nonmedical personnel. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18(1):12–6.
Timmerman A, et al. Intubating laryngeal mask airway for difficult out-of-hospital airway management: a prospective evaluation. Br J Anesth. 2007;99(2):286–91.
Frascone RJ, et al. Successful training of HEMS personnel in laryngeal mask airway and intubating mask airway placement. Air Med J. 2008;27(4):185–7.
Komatsu R, et al. Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube placement during manual in-line stabilization of the neck. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:113–7.
Russi C, et al. The laryngeal tube device: a simple and timely adjunct to airway management. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;25:263–7.
Russi C, et al. A pilot study of the King LT supralaryngeal airway use in a rural Iowa EMS system. Int J Emerg Med. 2008;1:135–8.
Jokela J, et al. Laryngeal tube and intubating laryngeal mask insertion in a manikin by first-responder trainees after a short video-clip demonstration. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(1):63–6.
Russi C, et al. A comparison of the King-LT to endotracheal intubation and combitube in a simulated difficult airway. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12(1):35–41.
Benumof JL, Cooper SD. Quantitative improvement in laryngoscopic view by optimal external laryngeal manipulation. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:136.
Knill RL. Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a “BURP”. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40:279.
Alexander R. More on BURP. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41(1):74.
Perry JJ, Lee J, Wells G. Are intubation conditions using rocuronium equivalent to those using succinylcholine? Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:813.
Li J, Murphy-Lavoie H, Bugas C, et al. Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:141.
Pace SA, Fuller FP. Out-of-hospital succinylcholine-assisted endotracheal intubation by paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:568.
Warner K, Sharar S, Copass M, Bulger E. Prehospital management of the difficult airway: a prospective cohort study. J Emerg Med. 2009;36(3):257–65.
Heegard W, et al. Use of the endotracheal tube introducer as an adjunct for oral tracheal intubation in the pre-hospital setting. Air Med J. 2003;22(1):28–31.
Jabre P, et al. Use of gum elastic bougie for pre-hospital difficult intubation. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(4):552–5.
Sakles J, et al. Airway management in the emergency department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31(3):325–32.
O’Brien D, et al. Pre-hospital blind nasotracheal intubation by paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(6):612–7.
O’Connor R, et al. Paramedic success rates for blind nasotracheal intubation is improved with the use of an endotracheal tube with directional tip control. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(4):328–32.
Cook S, et al. Pre-hospital cricothyrotomy in air medical transport: outcome. J Air Med Transp. 1991;10(12):7–9.
Xeropotamos NS, et al. Pre-hospital surgical airway management: 1 year’s experience form the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Injury. 1993;24(4):222–4.
Fortune J, et al. Efficacy of pre-hospital surgical crichothyrotomy in trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;42(5):832–8.
Narang A, et al. Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(3):160–5.
Aziz M, et al. Video laryngoscopy with the macintosh video laryngoscope in simulated pre-hospital scenarios by paramedic students. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13(2):251–5.
Sakles J, Mosier J, Chiu S, Keim S. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of Glidescope video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med. 2012;42(4):400–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tupesis, J.P., Van Dyk, N. (2013). Evaluation and Management of the Difficult Pre-Hospital Airway. In: Glick, D., Cooper, R., Ovassapian, A. (eds) The Difficult Airway. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92849-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92849-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-92848-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-92849-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)