Advertisement

Edible Films and Coatings for Fruits and Vegetables

  • Guadalupe I. I. Olivas
  • Gustavo Barbosa-Cánovas
Chapter

Abstract

There is a growing trend toward increased consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables. According to the USDA, fresh fruit consumption in the United States in 2000 was 28% above average annual fruit consumption of the 1970s, and fresh vegetable consumption was 26% above average annual vegetable consumption for the same period (USDA 2001–2002).

Higher consumption of fruits and vegetables has been associated with growing interest in a healthier diet, and is expected to increase over time. International organizations (World Health Organization/WHO 2002; Food and Agriculture Organization/FAO 2003) have been urging nations everywhere to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, as a diet high in such foods has been found to be associated with decreased incidences of birth defects, mental and physical retardation, weakened immune systems, blindness, cardio-vascular diseases, and some forms of cancer and diabetes (Ford and Mookdad 2001; Genkinger et al. 2004; Hung et al. 2004; FAO 2003). WHO (2002) has estimated that low fruit and vegetable intake is among the top ten risk factors contributing to mortality (2.7 million deaths each year). They also reported that 19% of gastrointestinal cancer, 31% of ischemic heart disease, and 11% of stroke occurrences are caused by low intake of fruits and vegetables.

Keywords

Whey Protein Ethylene Production Whey Protein Isolate Anaerobic Respiration Edible Film 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME (1992) Ethylene in Plan Biology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahvenainen R (1996) New approaches in improving the shelf life of minimally processed fruit and vegetables. Trends in Food Science and Technology 7(6), 179–187Google Scholar
  3. Amarante C, Banks NH, Ganesh S (2001) Effects of coating concentration, ripening stage, water status and fruit temperature on pear susceptibility to friction discoloration. Postharvest Biology and Technology 21, 283–290Google Scholar
  4. Andres C (1984) Natural edible coating has excellent moisture and grease barrier properties. Food Processing 45(13), 48–49Google Scholar
  5. Anker M, Standing M, Hermansson AM (2001) Aging of whey protein films and the effect on mechanical and barrier properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49, 989–995Google Scholar
  6. Aulton ME, Abdul-Razzak MH, Hogan JE (1981) The mechanical properties of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose films derived from aqueous systems. Part 1. The influence of plasticizers. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 7, 649–668Google Scholar
  7. Ayrancy E, Tunc S (2004) The effect of edible coatings on water and vitamin C loss of apricots (Armeniaca vulgaris Lam.) and green peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Food Chemistry 87(3), 339–342Google Scholar
  8. Ayranci E, Buyuktas S, Cetin E (1997) The effect of molecular weight of constituents on properties of cellulose-based edible films. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 30, 101–104Google Scholar
  9. Bai J, Baldwin EA, Hagenmaier RD (2002) Alternatives to shellac coatings provide comparable gloss, internal gas modification, and quality for “Delicious” apple fruit. HortScience 37(3), 559–563Google Scholar
  10. Bai J, Hagenmaier RD, Baldwin EA (2003a) Coating selection for “Delicious” and other apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 28, 381–390Google Scholar
  11. Bai J, Alleyne V, Hagenmaier RD, Mattheis JP, Baldwin EA (2003b) Formulation of zein coatings for apples (Malus domestica). Postharvest Biology and Technology 28, 259–268Google Scholar
  12. Baldwin EA (1994) Edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: past, present, and future. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO (Eds.) Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, pp. 25–64Google Scholar
  13. Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO, Baker RA (1995a) Edible coatings for lightly processed fruits and vegetables. HortScience 30(1), 35–40Google Scholar
  14. Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO, Baker RA (1995b) Use of edible coatings to preserve quality of lightly (and slightly) processed products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 35(6), 509–524Google Scholar
  15. Baldwin EA, Nisperos MO, Chen X, Hagenmaier RD (1996) Improving storage life of cut apple and potato with edible coating. Postharvest Biology and Technology 9(2), 151–163Google Scholar
  16. Baldwin EA, Burns JK, Kazokas W, Brecht JK, Hagenmaier RD, Bender RJ, Pesis DE (1999) Effect of two edible coatings with different permeability characteristics on mango (Mangifera indica L.) ripening during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 17, 215–226Google Scholar
  17. Baldwin EA, Wood B (2006) Use of edible coating to preserve pecans at room temperature. HortScience 41(1), 188–192Google Scholar
  18. Banks N, Dadzie B, Cleland D (1993) Reducing gas exchange of fruits with surface coatings. Postharvest Biology and Technology 3, 269–284Google Scholar
  19. BeMiller JN, Whistler RL (1996) Carbohydrates. In: Fennema OR (Ed.) Food Chemistry, 3rd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 157–223Google Scholar
  20. Cagri A, Ustunol Z, Ryser ET (2004) Antimicrobial edible films and coatings. Journal of Food Protection 67(4), 833–848Google Scholar
  21. Certel M, Uslu MK, Ozedemir F (2004) Effects of sodium caseinate- and milk protein concentrate-based edible coatings on the postharvest quality of Bing cherries. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84(10), 1229–1234Google Scholar
  22. Chien PJ, Sheub F, Ling HR (2007a) Coating citrus (Murcott tangor) fruit with low molecular weight chitosan increases postharvest quality and shelf life. Food Chemistry 100, 1160–1164Google Scholar
  23. Chien PJ, Sheu F, Yang FH (2007b) Effects of edible chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of sliced mango fruit. Journal of Food Engineering 78 (1), 225–229Google Scholar
  24. Cisneros-Zevallos L, Krochta JM (2002) Internal modified atmospheres of coated fresh fruits and vegetables: Understanding relative humidity effects. Journal of Food Science 67(6), 1990–1995Google Scholar
  25. Cisneros-Zevallos L, Krochta JM (2003a) Whey protein coatings for fresh fruits and relative humidity effects. Journal of Food Science 68(1), 176–181Google Scholar
  26. Cisneros-Zevallos L, Krochta JM (2003b) Dependence of coating thickness on viscosity of coating solution applied to fruits and vegetables by dipping method. Journal of Food Science 68(2), 503–510Google Scholar
  27. Claypool LL (1940) The waxing of deciduous fruits. American Society of Horticultural Science Proceedings 37, 443–447Google Scholar
  28. Curtis GJ (1988) Some experiments with edible coatings on the long-term storage of citrus fruits. Proceedings of the Sixth International Citrus Congress 3, 1514–1520Google Scholar
  29. Dangaran KL, Krochta JM (2007) Preventing the loss of tensile, barrier and appearance properties caused by plasticizer crystallization in whey protein films. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 42(9), 1094–1100Google Scholar
  30. Davies DH, Elson CM, Hayes ER (1989) N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan, a new water soluble chitin derivative. In: Skjåk-Bræk G, Anthonsen T, Sandford P (Eds.) Chitin and Chitosan: Sources, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Physical Properties and Applications. Elsevier, London, UK, pp. 467–72Google Scholar
  31. Debeaufort F, Martín-Polo M, Voilley A (1993) Polarity, homogeneity and structure affect water vapour permeability of model edible films. Journal of Food Science 58, 426–429, 434Google Scholar
  32. DeEll JR, Prange RK, Peppelenbos HW (2003) Postharvest physiology of fresh fruits and vegetables. In: Chakraverty A, Jujumdar AS, Raghava GSV, Ramaswamy HS (Eds.) Handbook of Postharvest Technology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 455–484Google Scholar
  33. Del-Valle V, Hernandez-Munoz P, Guarda A, Galotto MJ (2005) Development of a cactus-mucilage edible coating (Opuntia ficus indica) and its application to extend strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) shelf-life. Food Chemistry 91(4), 751–756Google Scholar
  34. Devlieghere F, Vermeulen A, Debevere J (2004) Chitosan: antimicrobial activity, interactions with food components and applicability as a coating on fruit and vegetables. Food Microbiology 21, 703–714Google Scholar
  35. Dong H, Cheng L, Tan J, Zheng K, Jiang Y (2004) Physicochemical properties and application of pullulan edible films and coatings in fruits preservation. Journal of Food Engineering 64, 355–358Google Scholar
  36. Donhowe IG, Fennema O (1993) The effects of plasticizers on crystallinity, permeability, and mechanical-properties of methylcellulose films. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 17, 247–257Google Scholar
  37. El-Ghaouth A, Arul J, Grenier J, Asselin A (1992) Chitosan coating to extend the storage life of tomatoes. HortScience 27(9), 1016–1018Google Scholar
  38. El-Ghaouth A, Arul J, Wilson C Benhamou N (1997) Biochemical and cytochemical aspects of the interactions of chitosan and Botrytis cinerea in bell pepper fruit. Posthharvest Biology and Technology 12, 183–194Google Scholar
  39. Fellman JK, Rudell DR, Mattinson DS, Mattheis JP (2003) Relationship of harvest maturity to flavor regeneratin after CA storage of ‘Delicious’ apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 27, 39–51Google Scholar
  40. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2003) Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption becomes a global priority. Taken from: http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/focus/2003/fruitveg1.htm in 2007Google Scholar
  41. Ford ES, Mokdad AH (2001) Fruit and vegetable consumption and diabetes mellitus incidence among U.S. adults. Preventive Medicine 32, 33–39Google Scholar
  42. Garcia E, Barret DM (2002) Preservative treatments for fresh cut fruits and vegetables. In: Lamikanra O (Ed.) Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 267–304Google Scholar
  43. García MA, Martino MN, Zaritky NE (1998) Starch-based coatings: effect on refrigerated strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 76(3), 411–420Google Scholar
  44. Genkinger JM, Platz EA, Hoffman SC, Comstock GW, Helzlsouer KJ (2004) Fruit, vegetable, and antioxidant intake and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality in a community-dwelling population in Washington County, Maryland. American Journal of Epidemiology 60, 1223–1233Google Scholar
  45. Gennadios A, Weller CL (1990) Edible films and coatings from wheat and corn proteins. Food Technology 44, 63–69Google Scholar
  46. Gennadios A, McHugh TH, Weller CL, Krochta JM (1994) Edible coatings and films based on proteins. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO (Eds.) Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 201–278Google Scholar
  47. Gordon LR (2005) Edible and biobased food packaging materials. In: Food Packaging Principles and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 43–54Google Scholar
  48. Gorny R, Cifuentes RA, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (2000) Quality changes in fresh-cut pear slices as affected by cultivar, ripeness stage, fruit size, and storage regime. Journal of Food Science 65, 541–544Google Scholar
  49. Guilbert S, Biquet B (1996) Edible films and coatings. In: Bureau G, Multon JL (Eds.) Food Packaging Technology. VCH Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Hagenmaier RD, Shaw PE (1990) Moisture permeability of edible films made with fatty acid and (hydroxypropyl) methylcellulose. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 38, 1799–1803Google Scholar
  51. Hagenmaier RD, Shaw PE (1992) Gas-permeability of fruit coating waxes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117(1), 105–109Google Scholar
  52. Han C, Zhao Y, Leonard SW, Traber MG (2004) Edible coatings to improve storability and enhance nutritional value of fresh and frozen strawberries Fragaria ananassa) and raspberries (Rubus ideaus). Postharvest Biology and Technology 33, 67–78Google Scholar
  53. Han JH, Seo GH, Park IM, Kim GN, Lee DS (2006) Physical and mechanical properties of pea starch edible films containing beeswax emulsions. Journal of Food Science 71(6), E290–E296Google Scholar
  54. Hardenburg RE (1967) Wax and related coatings for horticultural products. A bibliography. Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 51–15, USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. Hernandez-Munoz P, Almenar E, Ocio MJ, Gavara R (2006) Effect of calcium dips and chitosan coatings on postharvest life of strawberries (Fragaria × Ananassa). Postharvest Biology and Technology 39 (3), 247–253Google Scholar
  56. Hoffman AF (1916) Preserving Fruit. US patent 19,160,104Google Scholar
  57. Hoover R, Sosulski FW (1991) Composition, structure, functionality and chemical modification of legume starches. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 69, 79–92Google Scholar
  58. Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Jiang R (2004) Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. Journal of National Cancer Institute 96, 1577–1584Google Scholar
  59. Jangchud, A. and Chinnan, M.S. (1999) Properties of peanut protein film: Sorption isotherm and plasticizer effect. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 32, 89–94.Google Scholar
  60. Jiang Y, Li J, Jiang W (2005) Effects of chitosan coating on shelf life of cold-stored litchi fruit at ambient temperature. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 38, 757–761Google Scholar
  61. Kader AA (1986) Biochemical and physiological basis for effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on fruits and vegetables. Food Technology 40(5), 99–104Google Scholar
  62. Kamper SL, Fennema O (1984) Water vapor permeability of an edible, fatty acid, bilayer film. Journal of Food Science 49(6): 1482–1485.Google Scholar
  63. Kays SJ (1991) Metabolic processes in harvested products. In: Postharvest. Physiology of Perishable Plant Products. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 75–142Google Scholar
  64. Kays SJ (1999) Preharvest factors affecting appearance. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15(3), 233–247Google Scholar
  65. Kays SJ, Paull RE (2004) Stress in harvested products. In: Postharvest Biology. Exon Press, Athens, GA, pp. 355–414Google Scholar
  66. Ke T, Sun X (2001) Thermal and mechanical properties of poly (lactic acid) and starch blends with various plasticizers. Transactions of the ASAE 44(4), 945–953Google Scholar
  67. Ke D, Yahia E, Mateos M, Kader A (1994) Ethanolic fementation of Barlett pears as influenced by ripening stage and atmospheric composition. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 32(6), 593–600Google Scholar
  68. Kester JJ, Fennema O (1989) An edible film of lipids and cellulose ethers: barrier properties to moisture vapor transmission and structural evaluation. Journal of Food Science 54, 1383–1389Google Scholar
  69. Knee M (1980) Physiological responses of apple fruits to oxygen concentrations. Annals of Applied Biology 96, 243–253Google Scholar
  70. Koelsch CM, Labuza TP (1992) Functional, physical and morphological properties of methyl cellulose and fatty acid-based edible barriers. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 25, 404–411Google Scholar
  71. Krochta JM (1997) Edible composite moisture-barrier films. In: Blakistone B (Ed.) 1996 Packaging Yearbook. National Food Processing Association, Washington, DC, pp. 38–54Google Scholar
  72. Lakakul R, Beaudry RM, Hernandez RJ (1999) Modeling respiration of apple slices n modified-atmosphere packages. Journal of Food Science 64, 105–110Google Scholar
  73. Lin D, Zhao Y (2007) Innovations in the development and application of edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 6, 60–75Google Scholar
  74. Lourdin D, Valle GD, Colonna P (1995) Influence of amylose content on starch films and foams. Carbohydrate Polymers 27(4), 261–270Google Scholar
  75. Maftoonazad N, Ramaswamy HS (2005) Postharvest shelf life extension of avocados using methyl cellulose-based coatings. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 38, 617–624Google Scholar
  76. Maftoonazad N, Ramaswamy HS, Moalemiyan M, Kushalappa AC (2007) Effect of pectin-based edible emulsion coating on changes in quality of avocado exposed to Lasiodiplodia theobromae infection. Carbohydrate Polymers 68, 341–349Google Scholar
  77. Martínez-Romero D, Alburquerque N, Valverde JM, Guillén F, Castillo S, Valero D, Serrano M (2006) Postharvest sweet cherry quality and safety maintenance by Aloe vera treatment: a new edible coating. Postharvest Biology and Technology 39, 93–100Google Scholar
  78. McHugh TH, Krochta JM (1994) Milk-protein-based edible films and coatings. Food Technology 48(1), 97–103Google Scholar
  79. Mehyar GF, Han JH (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of high-amylose rice and pea starch films as affected by relative humidity and plasticizer. Journal of Food Science 69(9), E449–E454Google Scholar
  80. Mei Y, Zhao Y, Yang J, Furr HC (2002) Using edible coating to enhance nutritional and sensory qualities of baby carrots. Journal of Food Science 67, 1964–1968Google Scholar
  81. Mencarelli F, Saltveit ME, Massantini R (1989) Lightly processed foods: ripening of tomato slices. Acta Horticulturae 244, 193–200Google Scholar
  82. Miller S, Krochta JM (1997) Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: a review. Trends in Food Science Technology 8, 228–37Google Scholar
  83. Morillon V, Debeaufort F, Blond G, Cappelle M, Voilley A (2002) Factors affecting the moisture permeability of lipid-based edible films: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 42(1), 67–89Google Scholar
  84. Muzzarelli RAA (1986) Filmogenic properties of chitin/chitosan. In: Muzzarelli RAA, Jeuniaux C, Gooday GW (Eds.) Chitin in Nature and Technology. New York, Plenum Press, pp. 389–396Google Scholar
  85. Nguyen C, Carlin F (1994) The microbiology of minimally processed fresh fruits and vegetables. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 34(4), 371–401Google Scholar
  86. Nisperos MO, Baldwin EA (1996) Edible coatings for whole and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Food Australia 48(1), 27–31Google Scholar
  87. No HK, Meyers SP, Prinyawiwatkul W, Xu Z (2007) Applications of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of Foods: a Review. Journal of Food Science 72(5), R87–R100Google Scholar
  88. Olivas GI, Barbosa-Cánovas GV (2005) Edible coatings for fresh cut fruits. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 45, 657–670Google Scholar
  89. Olivas GI, Barbosa-Cánovas GV (2008) Alginate-calcium films: water vapor permeability and mechanical properties as affected by plasticizer and relative humidity. LWT-Food Science and Technology 41, 359–366Google Scholar
  90. Olivas GI, Rodriguez JJ, Barbosa-Cánovas GV (2003) Edible coatings composed of methylcellulose stearic acid, and additives to preserve quality of pear wedges. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 27, 299–320Google Scholar
  91. Olivas GI, Mattinson DS, Barbosa-Cánovas GV (2007) Alginate coatings for preservation of minimally processed “Gala” apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 45, 89–96Google Scholar
  92. Paillard NMM (1979) Biosynthese des produits volatils de la pomme: formation des alcools et des esters a partir des acides gras. Phytochemistry 18, 1165–1171.Google Scholar
  93. Park HJ, Chinnan MS (1990) Properties of edible coatings for fruits and vegetables. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Paper no. 90–6510. p. 19Google Scholar
  94. Park HJ, Weller CL, Vergano PJ, Testin RF (1993) Permeability and mechanical properties of cellulose based edible films. Journal of Food Science 58, 1361–1364, 1370Google Scholar
  95. Park HJ, Chinnan MS, Shewfelt RL (1994) Edible coating effects on storage life and quality of tomatoes. Journal of Food Science 59(3), 568–570Google Scholar
  96. Park HJ, Rhim JW, Lee HY (1996) Edible coating effects on respiration rate and storage life of Fuji apples and Shingo pears. Foods and Biotechnology 5(1), 59–63Google Scholar
  97. Park HJ (1999) Development of advanced edible coatings for fruits. Trends in Food Science and Technology 10, 254–260Google Scholar
  98. Pen LT, Jiang YM (2003) Effects of chitosan coating on shelf life and quality of fresh-cut Chinese water chestnut. Lebensmitte–Wissenschaft und Technologie 36, 359–364Google Scholar
  99. Peressini D, Bravin B, Lapasin R, Rizzotti C, Sensidoni A (2003) Starch-methylcellulose based edible films: rheological properties of film-forming dispersions. Journal of Food Engineering 59, 25–32Google Scholar
  100. Pérez-Gago MB, Krochta JM (2001) Lipid particle size effect on water vapor permeability and mechanical properties of whey protein/beeswax emulsion films. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49, 996–1002Google Scholar
  101. Pérez-Gago MB, Rojas C, Del Río MA (2003a) Effect of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose–lipid edible composite coatings on plum (cv. Autumn giant) quality during storage. Journal of Food Science 68(3), 879–883Google Scholar
  102. Pérez-Gago MB, Serra M, Alonso M, Mateos M, Del Río MA (2003b) Effect of solid content and lipid content of whey protein isolate-beeswax edible coatings on color change of fresh-cut apples. Journal of Food Science 68(7), 2186–2191Google Scholar
  103. Pérez-Gago MB, Serra M, Alonso M, Mateos M, Del Río MA (2005a) Effect of whey protein- and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based edible composite coatings on color change of fresh-cut apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 36, 77–85Google Scholar
  104. Pérez-Gago MB, Del Río MA, Serra M (2005b) Effect of whey protein-beeswax edible composite coating on color change of fresh-cut persimmons cv. “Rojo Brillante.” Acta Horticulturae 682 (3), 1917–1923Google Scholar
  105. Pérez-Gago MB, Serra M, Del Río MA (2006) Color change of fresh-cut apples coated with whey protein concentrate-based edible coatings. Postharvest Biology and Technology 39, 84–92Google Scholar
  106. Platenius, H (1939) Wax Emulsions for Vegetables. Cornell University Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin No.723. p 43Google Scholar
  107. Poenicke EF, Kays SJ, Smittle DA, Williamson RE (1977) Ethylene in relation to postharvest quality deterioration in processing cucumbers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 102, 303–306Google Scholar
  108. Quezada-Gallo J, Gramin A, Pattyn C, Diaz Amaro M, Debeaufort F, Voilley A (2005) Biopolymers used as edible coating to limit water transfer, colour degradation and aroma compound 2-pentanone lost in Mexican fruits. Acta Horticulturae 682(3), 1709–1716Google Scholar
  109. Ribeiro C, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA, Miranda C (2007) Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biology and Technology 44, 63–70Google Scholar
  110. Rojas-Argudo C, Pérez-Gago MB, Del Río MA (2005) Postharvest quality of coated cherries cv. “Burlat” as affected by coating composition and solids content. Food Science and Technology International 11(6), 417–424Google Scholar
  111. Rojas-Graü M, Raybaudi-Massilia RM, Soliva-Fortuny RC, Avena-Bustillos RJ, McHugh TH, Martín-Belloso O (2007) Apple puree-alginate edible coating as carrier of antimicrobial agents to prolong shelf-life of fresh-cut apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 45, 254–264Google Scholar
  112. Romanazzi G, Nigro F, Ippolito A, Di Venere D, Salerno M (2002) Effects of pre- and postharvest chitosan treatments to control storage grey mold of table grapes. Journal of Food Science 67(5), 1862–1867Google Scholar
  113. Rooney ML (1995) Overview of active food packaging. In: Rooney ML (Ed.) Active Food Packaging. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, pp. 1–37Google Scholar
  114. Rosen JC, Kader AA (1989) Postharvest physiology and quality maintenance of slices pear and strawberry fruits. Journal of Food Science 54, 656–659Google Scholar
  115. Saltveit ME (1997) Physical and physiological changes in minimally processed fruits and vegetables. In: Tomas-Barberan FA, Robins RJ (Eds.) Phytochemistry of Fruit and Vegetables. Clarendon Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 205–220Google Scholar
  116. Sams CE (1999) Preharvest factors affecting postharvest texture. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15(3), 249–254Google Scholar
  117. Sapers GM (1993) Browning of foods: control by sulfites, antioxidants, and other means. Food Technology 47(10), 75–84Google Scholar
  118. Sarkar SK, Phan CT (1979) Naturally-occurring and ethylene-induced compounds in the carrot root. Journal of Food Protection 42, 526–534Google Scholar
  119. Sebti I, Martial-Gros A, Carnet-Pantiez A, Grelier S, Coma V (2005) Chitosan polymer as bioactive coating and film against Aspergillus niger contamination. Journal of Food Science 70(2), M100–M104Google Scholar
  120. Sime WJ (1990) Alginates. In: P. Harris (Ed.), Food Gels, Elsevier Applied Science, London pp. 53–58Google Scholar
  121. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2005) Plasticizers in edible films and coatings. In: Han JH (Ed.) Innovations in Food Packaging. Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp. 403–433Google Scholar
  122. Tapia M, Rojas-Graü M, Rodríguez F, Ramírez J, Carmona A, Martin-Belloso O (2007) Alginate- and gellan-based edible films for probiotic coatings on fresh-cut fruits. Journal of Food Science 72(4), E190–E196Google Scholar
  123. Toivonen PMA, DeEll JR (2002) Physiology of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. In: Olusola Lamikanra (Ed.) Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 91–123Google Scholar
  124. Trezza TA, Krochta JM (2000) Color stability of edible coatings during prolonged storage. Journal of Food Science 65(7), 1166–1169Google Scholar
  125. Tuil R, Fowler P, Lawther M, Weber CJ (2000) Properties of biobased packaging materials. In: Weber CJ (Ed.) Biobased Packaging Materials for the Food Industry: Status and Perspectives. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark, pp. 13–45Google Scholar
  126. United States Department of Agriculture, USDA (2001–2002) Agriculture Fact BookGoogle Scholar
  127. US FDA/CFSAN (2006) Inventory of GRAS notices: summary of all GRAS notices. Available from: http://www.cfsah.fda.gov/~rdb/opa-gras.html. Accessed July 2007Google Scholar
  128. Valverde JM, Valero D, Martinez-Romero D, Guillen F, Castillo S, Serrano M (2005) Novel edible coating based on Aloe vera gel to maintain table grape quality and safety. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53(20), 7807–7813Google Scholar
  129. Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A, González-Martínez C (2006) Quality of cold-stored strawberries as affected by chitosan-oleic acid edible coatings. PostHarvest Biology and Technology 41 (2), 164–171Google Scholar
  130. Viña S, Mugridge A, García MA, Ferreyra RM, Martino MN, Chaves AR, Zaritzky NE (2007) Effects of polyvinylchloride films and edible starch coatings on quality aspects of refrigerated Brussels sprouts. Food Chemistry 103(3), 701–709Google Scholar
  131. Vojdani F, Torres JA (1990) Potassium sorbate permeability of methylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose coatings – effect of fatty-acids. Journal of Food Science 55(3), 841–846Google Scholar
  132. Wang LZ, Liu L, Holmes J, Kerry JF, Kerry JP (2007) Assessment of film-forming potential and properties of protein and polysaccharide-based biopolymer films. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 42(9), 1128–1138Google Scholar
  133. Watada AE, Abe K, Yamauchi N (1990) Physiological activities of partially processed fruits and vegetables. Food Technology 20, 116, 118, 120–122Google Scholar
  134. Wong DWS, Camirand WM, Pavlath AE (1994) Development of edible coatings for minimally processed fruits and vegetables. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO (Eds.) Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, pp. 65–88Google Scholar
  135. World Health Organisation. (2002) The world health report: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva: World Health OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  136. Xu S, Chen X, Sun D (2001) Preservation of kiwifruit coated with an edible film at ambient temperature. Journal of Food Engineering 50(4), 211–216Google Scholar
  137. Yaman Ö, Bayoιndιrlι L (2002) Effects of an edible coating and cold storage on shelf-life and quality of cherries. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie 35, 146–150Google Scholar
  138. Zagory D (1999) Effects of post-processing handling and packaging on microbial populations. PostHarvest Biology and Technology 15: 313–321Google Scholar
  139. Zhang D, Quantick PC (1997) Effects of chitosan coating on enzymatic browning and decay during postharvest storage of litchi (Litchichinensis Sonn.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 12, 195–202Google Scholar
  140. Zhang Y, Han JH (2006) Mechanical and thermal characteristics of pea starch films plasticized with monosaccharides and polyols. Journal of Food Science 71(2), 109–E118Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guadalupe I. I. Olivas
    • 1
  • Gustavo Barbosa-Cánovas
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD)Av. Río ConchosS/N, CuauhtémocMexico

Personalised recommendations