Advertisement

Bioinformatics pp 331-345 | Cite as

Literature Databases

  • J. Lynn Fink
Chapter

Abstract

Published research is the foundation for all future research. Therefore, access to published research is a requirement for effectively engaging in scientific research. Scientists and policy-makers came to this realization several centuries ago and created the first scientific journals in 1665: the Journal de Sçavans, initiated by the French parliament member, Denis de Sallo1; and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, published by the Royal Society of London (Eisenstein 1979). These publications provided a common forum to help scientists disseminate observations and present theories to a much broader audience than was previously possible and thus established our current paradigm of scientific communication.

Keywords

Full Text MeSH Term Full Text Article Philosophical Transaction Literature Database 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ashburner M et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29Google Scholar
  2. Benson D et al (1990) The National Center for Biotechnology Information. Genomics 6:389–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berners-Lee T et al (2006) Computer science. Creating a science of the Web. Science 313:769–771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berners-Lee T et al (2001) The Semantic Web. Scientific American MagazineGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle R (1665) An account of a very odd monstrous calf. Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond 1:10Google Scholar
  6. Doms A, Schroeder M (2005) GoPubMed: exploring PubMed with the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W783–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenstein E (1979) The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  8. Feather J (1980) The Book Trade in Politics: The Making of the Copyright Act of 1710. Publishing His 8:19–44Google Scholar
  9. Fink L, Bourne P (2007) Reinventing scholarly communication for the electronic age. CTWatch Q 3:26–31Google Scholar
  10. Fink J et al. (2008) BioLit: Integrating biological literature with databases. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W385–W389Google Scholar
  11. Herskovic JR et al (2007) A day in the life of PubMed: analysis of a typical day’s query log. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:212–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. MacCallum CJ (2007) When is open access not open access? PLoS Biol 5:2095–2097Google Scholar
  13. McEntyre J, Lipman D (2001) PubMed: bridging the information gap. CMAJ 164:1317–1319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Vandenhaute B et al (2000) Epignathus teratoma: report of three cases with a review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Weenink K, Waaijers L, van Godtsenhoven K (2008) A DRIVER’s Guide to European Repositories. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Yuan G et al (2007) Hypertriglyceridemia: its etiology, effects and treatment. CMAJ 176:1113–1120Google Scholar
  17. Some anatomical observations of milk found in veins, instead of blood; and of grass, found in the wind-pipes of some animals. Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond 1:100–101Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations