Advertisement

Occupational Exposure in Wireless Communication

  • Kjell Hansson Mild
  • Jonna Wilén
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems book series (AEFL, volume 5)

Abstract

Today we are exposed to electromagnetic fields from the use of wireless communication devices almost everywhere. However, occupational exposure where there is a possibility to exceed the international guidelines occurs only in work very near mobile phone base stations, and this exposure can easily be dealt with in practice in the form of instructions and administrative measures. All other devices produce exposure well below present guidelines. This low-level exposure has been discussed from a health perspective, and in this paper the exposure from sources such as mobile phones, cordless phones, WiMax, WLAN and base station antennas is discussed. The problem of exposure assessment for epidemiological studies is also dealt with in a general manner.

Keywords

Mobile Phone Specific Absorption Rate Base Station Antenna Cordless Phone Phone Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen, J.B., and Pedersen, G.F., 1997, The technology of mobile telephone systems relevant for risk assessment. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 72: 249–257.Google Scholar
  2. Anger, G., 2003, SAR and emitted power for 21 mobile phones. Swedish Radiation Protection Authority SSI Rapport: 01 January 2002 (in Swedish).ANSI, Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, (IEEE Standard C95.1), New York 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Dimbylow, P., Khalid, M., and Mann, S., 2003, Assessment of specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the head from a TETRA handset. Phys Med Biol 48: 3911–3926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erdreich, L.S., Van Kerkhove, M.D., Scrafford, C.G., Barraj, L., McNeely, M., Shum, M., Sheppard, A.R., and Kelsh, M., 2007, Factors that influence the radiofrequency power output of GSM mobile phones. Radiat Res 168(2): 253–261. FCC, “Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields,” Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C, OET Bull. 65, Aug. 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foster, K.R., 2007, Radiofrequency exposure from wireless LANs utilizing WiFi technology. Health Phys 92: 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansson Mild, K., Oftedal, G., Sandström, M., Wilén, J., Tynes, T., Haugsdal, B., and Hauger, E., 1998, Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones. A Swedish–Norwegian epidemiological study. Swedish National Institute for Working Life, Arbetslivsrapport: 23, ISSN 1401-2928.Google Scholar
  7. Hansson Mild, K., Wilén, J., Carlberg, M., and Hardell, L., 2004, “Exposure” and “dose” in mobile phone health studies. In: Mobile Communication and Health: Medical, Biological and Social Problems. International WHO Conference, Moscow, 22–24 Sept., pp. 70–79.Google Scholar
  8. Hansson Mild, K., Carlberg, M., Wilén, J., and Hardell, L., 2005, How to combine the use of different mobile and cordless telephones in epidemiological studies on brain tumours? Eur J Cancer Prev 14: 285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardell, L., Hansson Mild, K., and Carlberg, M., 2006, Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79: 630–639.Google Scholar
  10. Hillert, L., Ahlbom, A., Feychting, M., Jarup, L., Larsson, A., Neasham, D., and Elliott, P., 2003, Mobile phone use: Validation of exposure assessment. The Bioelectromagnetics Society Annual Meeting, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Hours, M., Bernard, M., Montestrucq, L., Arslan, M., Bergeret, A., Deltour, I., and Cardis, E., 2007, Cell phones and risk of brain and acoustic nerve tumours: The French interphone case-control study. Revue d´Epidemiologie et de Santé Publique doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2007.06.22.Google Scholar
  12. Ilvonen, S., Sihvonen, A.P., Kärkkäinen, K., and Sarvas, J., 2005, Numerical assessment of induced ELF currents in the human head due to the battery current of a digital mobile phone. Bioelectromagnetics 26: 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), 1998, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74: 494–522.Google Scholar
  14. Jokela, K., Puranen, L., and Sihvonen, A.P., 2004, Assessment of the magnetic field exposure due to the battery current of digital mobile phones. Health Phys 86: 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhn, S., and Kuster, N., 2007, Experimental EMF exposure assessment. In: Polk, C., and Postow, E., Eds., Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 3rd Ed. Bioengineering and Biophysical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 381–409.Google Scholar
  16. Kuster, N., 1997, Swiss tests show wide variation in radiation exposure from cell phones. Microwave News Nov/Dec, pp. 1, 10–11.Google Scholar
  17. Kuster, N., Schuderer, J., Christ, A., Futter, P., and Ebert, S., 2004, Guidance for exposure design of human studies addressing health risk evaluations of mobile phones. Bioelectromagnetics 25: 524–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linde, T., and Hansson Mild, K., 1997, Measurement of low frequency magnetic fields from digital cellular telephones. Bioelectromagnetics 18: 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morrissey, J.J., 2007, Radio frequency exposure in mobile phone users: Implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 123(4): 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MTHR, 2007, Progress report from the UK’s Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) Programme. Progress report 2007.Google Scholar
  21. Neitzke, H.P., Osterhoff, J., Peklo, K., and Voigt, H., 2007, Determination of exposure due to mobile phone base stations in an epidemiological study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm371.Google Scholar
  22. Neubauer, G., Feychting, M., Hamnerius, Y., Kheifets, L., Kuster, N., Ruiz, I., Schuz, J., Uberbacher, R., Wiart, J., and Roosli, M., 2007, Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations. Bioelectromagnetics 28(3): 224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nordström, E., 2004. Calculation of specific absorption rate (SAR) for typical WCDMA base station antennas at 2140 MHz. LiTH-IFM-EX-04/1355-SE, MSc Thesis report, Linköping University.Google Scholar
  24. Persson, B., Salford, L., and Brun, A., 1997, Blood–brain barrier permeability in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless communications. Wireless Netw 3: 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Persson, T., Törnevik, C., Larsson, L.E., and Lovén, J., 2002, GSM mobile phone output power distribution by network analysis of all calls in some urban, rural and in office networks, complemented by test phone measurements. Bioelectromagnetics Society 24th Annual Meeting, 23–27 June, Quebec City, QC, Canada, pp. 182–183.Google Scholar
  26. Persson, T., Hamberg, L., Törnevik, C., and Larsson, L.E., 2005, Measured output power distribution for 3G WCDMA mobile phones. Bioelectromagnetics 2005. A joint meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association, Dublin, pp. 473–474.Google Scholar
  27. Santini, R., Santini, P., Le Ruz, P., Danze, J.M., and Seigne, M., 2003, Survey of people living in the vicinity of cellular phone base stations. Electromagn Biol Med 22: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schuz, J., and Mann, S., 2000, A discussion of potential exposure metrics for use in epidemiological studies on human exposure to radiowaves from mobile phone base stations. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10(6, Part 1): 600–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Straume, A., Johnsson, A., Oftedal, G., and Wilén, J., 2007, Frequency spectra from current- vs. magnetic flux density measurements for mobile phones and other electrical appliances. Health Phys 93(4): 279–287.Google Scholar
  30. Wilén, J., Sandström, M., and Hansson Mild, K., 2003, Subjective symptoms among mobile phone users – A consequence of absorbtion of radiofrequency fields? Bioelectromagnetics 24: 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiation PhysicsUmeå UniversitySESweden

Personalised recommendations