Abstract
The cued overeating model that is presented in this chapter states that cues that reliably signal highly palatable food intake – such as the sight, smell, and taste of highly palatable foods – and also the context in which (over)eating takes place – like place and time and feelings and thoughts – may start to act as conditioned stimuli. This means that soon after, the cues alone can trigger food cue reactivity and food cravings. The learned cue reactivity increases the probability of (over)eating and might sabotage dieting. It is argued that for successful dieting it is necessary to extinguish learned cue reactivity. To reach that goal, the way of dieting is relevant: dieters who avoid highly palatable food cues and dieters who intermittently keep eating high-calorie high-fat palatable foods will remain cue reactive. Only dieters who expose themselves to highly palatable food cues without eating them are expected to show the desired extinction of cue reactivity. Extinction of cue reactivity can be accelerated by prolonged cue exposure with response prevention. During the exposure the overeater is exposed to the cues (e.g., smell and sight of tasty foods) that elicit appetite or craving. The exposure is long lasting and without eating. Whether cue exposure with response prevention is an effective intervention that promotes successful dieting remains to be studied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- WHO:
-
World Health Organisation
- CS:
-
Conditioned stimulus (= cues)
- US:
-
Unconditioned stimulus
- UR:
-
Unconditioned response
- CR:
-
Conditioned response
- CBT:
-
Cognitive behaviour therapy
References
American Psychiatric Association. Comittee on nomenclature and statistics: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
Boggiano MM, Dorsey JR, Thomas JM, Murdaugh DL. The Pavlovian power of palatable food: lessons for weight-loss adherence from a new rodent model of cue-induced overeating. Int J Obes. 2009;33:693–701.
Bouton ME, Woods AM, Moody EW, Sunsay C, Garcia-Gutierrez A. Counteracting the context-dependence of extinction: relapse and tests of some relapse prevention methods. In: Craske M, Hermans D, Vansteenwegen D, editors. Lear and fearning. From basic processes to clinical implications. Washington, DC: APA; 2006. p. 175–96.
Bruce B, Agras W. Binge eating in females: a population-based investigation. Int J Eat Disord. 1992;12:365–73.
Bulik CM, Sullivan FA, Carter FA, McIntosh VV, Joyce PR. The role of exposure with response prevention in the cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa. Psychol Med. 1998;28:611–23.
Carter FA, Bulik CM. Exposure treatments for bulimia nervosa: procedure, efficacy, and mechanisms. Adv Behav Res Ther. 1994;16:77–129.
Deutsch R. Conditioned hypoglycemia: a mechanism for saccharin-induced sensitivity to insulin in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974;86:350–8.
Gorin AA, Phelan S, Wing RR, Hill JO. Promoting long-term weight control: does dieting consistency matter? Int J Obes. 2004;28:278–81.
Havermans RC, Mulkens S, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. The efficacy of cue exposure with response prevention in extinguishing drug and alcohol cue reactivity. Behav Interv. 2007;22:121–35.
Herman CP, Mack D. Restrained and unrestrained eating. J Pers. 1975;43:647–60.
Jansen A. A Learning model of binge eating: cue reactivity and cue exposure. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:257–72.
Jansen A, van den Hout M. On being led into temptation: ‘counterregulation’ of dieters after smelling a ‘preload’. Addict Behav. 1991;5:247–53.
Jansen A, van den Hout M, van Loof C, Zandbergen J, Griez E. A case of bulimia succesfully treated with cue exposure. Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1989;20:327–32.
Jansen A, Broekmate J, Heymans M. Cue exposure vs self-control in the treatment of binge eating: a pilot study. Behav Res Ther. 1992;30:235–41.
Jansen A, Theunissen N, Slechten K, Nederkoorn C, Mulkens S, Roefs A. Overweight children overeat after exposure to food cues. Eat Behav. 2003;4:197–209.
Jansen A, Vanreyten A, van Balveren T, Roefs A, Nederkoorn Ch, Havermans R. Negative affect and cue-induced overeating in non-eating disordered obesity. Appetite 2008;51:556–62.
Jansen A, Stegerman S, Roefs A, Nederkoorn C, Havermans R. Decreased salivation to food cues in formerly obese successful dieters. Submitted for publication; 2009.
Marcus MD, Wing RR, Lamparski D. Binge eating and dietary restraint in obese patients. Addict Behav. 1985;10:163–8.
Martinez-Mallén E, Castro-Fornieles J, Lazaro L, Moreno E, Morer A, Font E, Julien J, Vila M, Toro J. Cue exposure in the treatment of resistant adolescent bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40:596–601.
Mattes RD. Physiological responses to sensory stimulation by food: nutritional implications. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:406–12.
Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Cue reactivity and regulation of food intake. Eat Behav. 2002;3:61–72.
Nederkoorn C, Smulders F, Jansen A. Cephalic phase responses, craving and food intake in normal subjects. Appetite 2000;35:45–55.
Overduin J, Jansen A. Conditioned insulin and blood sugar responses in humans in relation to binge eating. Physiol Behav. 1997;61:569–75.
Overduin J, Dworkin BR, Jansen A. Introduction and commentary to: Mityushov, M.I. (1954): conditioned reflex secretion of insulin. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1954;32:228–46.
Power ML, Schulkin J. Anticipatory physiological regulation in feeding biology: cephalic phase responses. Appetite 2008;50:194–206.
Powley T. The ventromedial hypothalamic syndrome, satiety and a cephalic phase hypothesis. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:89–126.
Raynor HA, Jeffery RW, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Amount of food group variety consumed in the diet and long-term weight loss maintenance. Obes Res. 2005;13:883–90.
Rodin J. Insulin levels, hunger, and food intake: an example of feedback loops in body weight regulation. Health Psychol. 1985;4:1–24.
Rolls ET, Rolls JH. Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans. Physiol Behav. 1997;61:461–73.
Siegel S. Conditioning of insulin-induced glycemia. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972;78:233–41.
Siegel S. Classical conditioning, drug tolerance and drug dependence. In: Israel Y, Smart FB, editors. Research advances in alcohol and drug problems, vol 7. New York: Plenum; 1983. p. 207–46.
Stice E, Bohon C, Fischer K. Subtyping women with bulimia nervosa along dietary and negative affect dimensions: further evidence of reliability and validity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76:1022–33.
Toro J, Cervera M, Feliu MH, Carriga N, Jou M, Martinez E, Toro E. Cue exposure in the treatment of resistant bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;34:227–34.
Wadden TA, Brownell KD, Foster GD. Obesity: responding to the global epidemic. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:510–25.
Wardle J. Conditioning processes and cue exposure in the modification of excessive eating. Addict Behav. 1990;15:387–93.
Weingarten H. Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: a role for learning in meal initiation. Science 1983;220:431–2.
Wing RR, Hill JO. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:323–41.
Wing RR, Phelan S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(suppl):222S–5S.
Woods SC. The eating paradox: how we tolerate food. Psychol Rev. 1991;4:488–505.
World Health Organisation (2009). http://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jansen, A., Havermans, R.C., Nederkoorn, C. (2011). Cued Overeating. In: Preedy, V., Watson, R., Martin, C. (eds) Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_92
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_92
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-92270-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-92271-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)