Abstract
Consumers observe many stimuli in the environment when they choose or consume foods. These external stimuli can be differentiated as having a direct or indirect effect on people. Direct stimuli aim to influence consumers’ perception of a product (e.g., its expected taste) and their food choice. Nutrition labels, for example, aim to help consumers to make healthy food choices. In contrast, indirect stimuli are not knowingly observed by consumers but affect their food consumption subconsciously. For instance, people will buy more bread when the smell of freshly baked bread is spread throughout a supermarket. In this chapter, we review studies that have investigated how consumers are influenced by direct and indirect stimuli. We elaborate on the psychological factors that are involved in the perception and processing of these two stimuli types.
Direct stimuli are confined to nutrition information and thereby focus on how nutrition tables, labels, and claims can influence consumers’ perception of food products. Nutrition information on products can affect consumers in two ways. First, research shows that people can make healthier food choices if they have nutritional values of other products available as reference information for evaluating the nutritional value of a product. Second, nutrition labels and claims often function as translators of quantitative nutrition information (e.g., nutrient content).
Indirect stimuli, conversely, are part of the environment but will often go unnoticed as influences on food consumption. Previous studies show that a wide range of external cues can function as indirect stimuli or primers. To be able to affect food consumption, indirect cues need to prime an association that is related to this behavior. Moreover, people should be motivated to show the primed food consumption behavior.
We discuss how the mental processes of direct and indirect stimuli are related. We will also explain the conditions that determine which type of stimulus will influence food consumption, by elaborating on a dual process model of information processing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- FOP:
-
Front-of-package label
References
Ajzen I. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1991; 50:179–211.
Bargh JA. In: Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM, editors. Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. New York: Guilford; 1990. p. 93–130.
Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, editors. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 253–85.
Bellisle F, Dalix A-M. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 74:197–200.
Boon B, Stroebe W, Schut H, Jansen A. Brit J Health Psych. 1998; 3:27–40.
British Market Research Bureau. Comprehension and use of UK nutrition signpost labelling schemes. London: Food Standards Agency; 2009.
Brunner T, Siegrist M. Primed to eat less: How unobtrusive external cues influence how much we eat. Unpublished manuscript. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; 2009.
Caldwell C, Hibbert S. Psychol Market. 2002; 19:895–917.
Chaiken S, Liberman A, Eagly AH. In: Uleman JS, Bargh JA, editors. Unintended thought. New York: Guilford; 1989. p. 212–52.
Chandon P, Wansink B. J Marketing Res. 2002; 39:321–35.
Conger J, Conger A, Costanzo P, Wright L, Matter J. J Pers. 1980; 48:258–71.
Cowburn G, Stockley L. Public Health Nutr. 2005; 8:21–8.
Danzig F. Advertising Age. 1962; 33.
De Bruijn G-J, Kremers SPJ, de Vet E, de Nooijer J, van Mechelen W, Brug J. Psychol Health. 2007; 22:899–916.
De Castro J, Brewer E. Physiol Behav. 1992; 51:121–5.
Dijksterhuis A, Smith PK, van Baaren RB, Wigboldus DHJ. J Consum Psychol. 2005; 15:193–202.
Edelman B, Engell D, Bronstein P, Hirsch E. Appetite. 1986; 7:71–83.
Engell D, Kramer M, Malafi T, Salomon M, Lesher L. Appetite. 1996; 26:129–38.
Fazio RH, Towles-Schwen. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y, editors. Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford; 1999. p. 97–116.
Feunekes GI, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA, Lion R, van den Kommer M. Appetite. 2008; 50:57–70.
Geiger CJ, Wyse BW, Parent CR, Hansen RG. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991; 91:800–7.
Goldman S, Herman C, Polivy J. Appetite. 1991; 17:129–40.
Henderson C. Wall Street J. 1957; 1:14.
Herman C, Polivy J. Physiol Behav. 2005; 86:762–72.
Herman C, Roth D, Polivy J. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129:873–86.
Herman P, Polivy J. In: Stunkard A, Stellar E, editors. Eating and its disorders. New York: Raven Press; 1984. p. 141–56.
Higgins E. In: Higgins E, Kruglanski A, editors. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press; 1996. p. 133–68.
Higginson CS, Kirk TR, Rayner MJ, Draper S. Nutr Food Sci. 2002; 32:145–52.
Hsee CK. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1996; 67:247–57.
Hsee CK. J Behav Decis Making. 1998; 11:107–21.
Johnston L. Soc Cognition. 2002; 20:18–35.
Kähkönen P, Tuorila H. Appetite. 1998; 30:13–23.
Karremans J, Stroebe W, Claus J. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2006; 42:792–8.
Khan U, Dhar R, Wertenbroch K. In: Ratneshwar S, Mick DG, editors.Inside consumption: Frontiers of research on consumer motives, goals, and desires. London: Routledge; 2005. p. 144–65.
Levitsky D. Appetite. 2002; 38:143–8.
Levy AS, Fein SB, Schucker RE. J Public Policy Mark. 1996; 15:1–15.
Lewis CJ, Yetley EA. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992; 92:62–6.
Lyman B. A psychology of food. More than a matter of taste. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold; 1989.
Nisbett R, Storms M. In: London H, Nisbett R, editors. Thought and feeling: Cognitive alternation of feeling states. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1974. p. 190–208.
Painter J, Wansink B, Hieggelke J. Appetite. 2002; 38:237–8.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer; 1986.
Pliner P, Bell R, Hirsch ES, Kinchla M. Appetite. 2006; 46:189–98.
Polivy J, Herman C, Younger J, Erskine B. J Pers. 1979; 47:100–17.
Raghunathan R, Naylor RW, Hoyer WD. J Mark. 2006; 70:170–84.
Rolls B, Roe L, Meengs J. Obesity. 2007; 15:1535–43.
Rolls B, Rowe E, Rolls E, Kingston B, Megson A, Gunary R. Physiol Behav. 1981; 26:215–21.
Rosenthal B, Marx R. Addict Behav. 1979; 4:215–21.
Schachter S, Friedman L, Handler J. In: Schachter S, Rodin J, editors. Obese humans and rats. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum; 1974. p. 61–4.
Solheim R, Lawless HT. Food Qual Prefer. 1996; 7:137–43.
Stevenson R, Prescatt J, Boakes R. Chem Senses. 1999; 24:627–35.
Strahan E, Spencer S, Zanna M. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2002; 38:556–68.
Stubenitsky K, Aaron JI, Catt SL, Mela DJ. Food Qual Prefer. 1999; 10:367–76.
Van Kleef E, van Trijp H, Paeps F, Fernández-CelemĂn L. Public Health Nutr. 2007; 1–11.
Veltkamp M, Aarts H, Custers R. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008; 44:866–73.
Visschers VHM, Hess R, Siegrist M. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13:1099–106.
Visschers VHM, Siegrist M. Appetite. 2009; 52:505–12.
Visschers, VHM, Siegrist M. When reduced fat causes increased preference: How fat reduction in nutrition tables and numeracy skills affect food choices. Appetite. In press, corrected proof, DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.001.
Viswanathan M, Hastak M. J Public Policy Mark. 2002; 21:305–18.
Wansink B. J Mark. 1996; 60:1–14.
Wansink B, Kim J. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005; 37:242–5.
Wansink B, Park S. Food Qual Prefer. 2001; 12:69–74.
Wansink B, van Ittersum K. J Cons Res. 2003; 30:455–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Visschers, V.H.M., Brunner, T.A. (2011). Healthy Choices? The Implications of Direct and Indirect Stimuli for Product Perception and Food Consumption. In: Preedy, V., Watson, R., Martin, C. (eds) Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-92270-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-92271-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)