Skip to main content

Non-sensory Factors Which Influence Choice Behavior of Foods That Have a Positive Effect on Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition

Abstract

Functional foods can be defined as foods that have a positive effect on health, beyond satisfying basic nutritional needs. These products have been developed in an attempt to improve the health status of the population and to reduce the global impact of chronic diseases. Despite the fact that it could be argued that consumers would undoubtedly accept this type of product, it has not been the case. Consumers’ choice behavior of functional foods is a complex process that involves many different factors, including sensory and nonsensory factors. Since consumers will only consider substituting conventional with functional foods if the latter are perceived as healthier, consumers’ attitudes toward health-related issues have been identified as central in determining choice behavior of functional foods. Besides, consumers’ perceived risk and concerns associated with processing technologies and scientific innovations also affect their perception of this type of food product. However, consumers’ attitudes toward functional foods do not depend only on their perceived healthiness and their trust in functional foods, but also on the same characteristics, including sensory quality, price, and convenience, as any conventional product. Consumers are not willing to negotiate those characteristics for eventual long-term health benefits. Therefore, when deciding to buy a certain functional food, consumers have to trade health, sensory, and other nonsensory factors, such as brand, price, and packaging. In this context, the aim of the present chapter is to review nonsensory factors which influence consumers’ choice behavior of functional foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 1,199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 1,199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anttolainen M, Luoto R, Uutela A, Boice JD, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101:1365–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ares G, Giménez A, Gámbaro A. J Sens Stud. 2008a; 23:614–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ares G, Giménez A, Gámbaro A. Appetite. 2008b; 50:663–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ares G, Giménez A, Gámbaro A. J Sci Food Agric. 2008c; 88:2061–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ares G, Deliza R, Giménez A. Food Qual Pref. 2010; 21:361–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsworth A, Bryman A, Keil T, Goode J, Haslam C, Lancashire E. Br Food J. 2002; 107:470–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bech-Larsen T, Grunert KG, Poulsen JB. The acceptance of functional foods in Denmark, Finland and the United States. A study of consumers’ conjoint evaluations of the qualities of functional food and perceptions of general health factors and cultural values. Working paper no 73. MAAP, Århus; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue J, Ryan M. Market-oriented new product development: Functional foods and the Irish consumer. Agribusiness Discussion Paper No. 27. National University of Ireland, Cork; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs NM. J Consum Market. 1997; 14:433–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs NM, Poryzees GH. Brit Food J. 1998; 9:419–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DN, Koster A, Russell CG. Appetite. 2004; 33:55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crites SL, Jr., Aikman SN. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59:1191–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dagevos H. Appetite. 2005; 45:32–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong N, Ocké MC, Branderhorst HAC, Friele R. Brit J Nutr. 2003; 89:273–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong N, Simojoki M, Laatikainen T, Tapanainen H, Valsta L, Lahtikoski M, et al. Preventive Med. 2004; 39:849–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WB, Monroe KB, Grewal D. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers product evaluations. J Market Res. 1991; 28:307–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herath D, Cranfield J, Henson S. Appetite. 2008; 51:256–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilliam M. Nutr Rev. 1996; 54:S189–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilliam M. Aust J Dairy Tech. 2003; 58:98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILSI Europe Brit J Nutr. 1999; 81:S1–S27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger SR. Food Qual Pref. 2006; 17:132–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas MS, Beckman SC. Functional foods: consumer perceptions in Denmark and England. MAAP Working Paper No. 55. MAPP, Århus; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller KL. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring and managing brand equity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy P, Carter P, Blair E. Org Behav Human Dec Proc. 2001; 85:382–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krystallis A, Maglaras G, Mamalis S. Food Qual Pref. 2008; 19:525–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque JA, Doyon M, Bellavance F, Kolodinsky J. Can J Agric Econ. 2006; 54:647–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lähteenmäki L. In: Mattila-Sandholm T, Saarela M, editors. Functional dairy products. Cambridge: Woodhead Publication; 2003. p. 346–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lähteenmäki L, Lyly M, Urala N. In: Frewer L, van Trijp H, editors. Understanding consumers of food products. Cambridge: Woodhead Publication; 2007. p. 412–27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Margaret A. Concepts of functional foods. ILSI Europe Concise Monograph Series. ILSI Europe, Belgium; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazis MB, Raymond MA. J Consum Affairs. 1997; 31:10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menrad K. J Food Eng. 2003; 56:181–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niva M, Mäkelä J, Piiroinen S. Domestic berries and plant stanols. Acceptability of functional foods in Finland.Helsinski: National Consumer Research Centre; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor EL, White KM. Food Qual Pref. 2010; 21:75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson R, Kristal A, Lynch J, White E. J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27:86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen JB. Danish consumers’ attitudes towards functional foods. Working paper no 62. MAPP, Århus; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen M, Niinikoski H, Keskinen S, Helenius H, Talvia S, Rönnemaa T. Appetite. 2003; 41:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H. Appetite. 1999; 33:71–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd R, Sparks P. In: MacFie HJH, Thomson DMH, editors. Measurement of food preferences. London: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1994. p. 202–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Stampfli N, Kastenholz H. Appetite. 2008; 51:526–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siró I, Kápolna E, Kápolna B, Lugasi S. Appetite. 2008; 51:456–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuorila H, Cardello AV. Food Qual Pref. 2002; 13:561–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urala N, Lähteenmäki L. Nutr Food Sci. 2003; 33:148–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urala N, Lähteenmäki L. Food Qual Pref. 2007; 18:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM, Luning P. Appetite. 2005; 44:299–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM, Luning P, Jongen WMF. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2002; 13:93–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Trijp HCM, van der Lans IA. Appetite. 2007; 48:305–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke W. Food Qual Pref. 2005; 16:45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke W. Food Qual Pref. 2006; 17:126–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink B, Westgren RE, Cheney MM. Nutr. 2005; 21:264–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle J, Parmenter K, Waller J. Appetite. 2000; 34:269–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Diet, physical activity and health.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic disease.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gastón Ares .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ares, G. (2011). Non-sensory Factors Which Influence Choice Behavior of Foods That Have a Positive Effect on Health. In: Preedy, V., Watson, R., Martin, C. (eds) Handbook of Behavior, Food and Nutrition. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92271-3_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-92270-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-92271-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics