The Impact of Health-Promoting Media-Literacy Education on Nutrition and Diet Behavior



Public health professionals increasingly recognize that the media have a significant influence on the behavior of young people with regard to nutrition, dieting, eating disorders, body image, overweight, and obesity. In response, they have used many strategies to address the effects of media on health. Regulating media content, limiting children’s media use, and social marketing are approaches that have been used traditionally, but media literacy education has emerged in the last 20 years as a promising alternative to the censorship of regulating “unhealthy” programming or limiting media use. Although several studies have used media literacy education as a strategy to improve dietary choices, to date there has been no comprehensive review of this literature. A conference report on Setting Research Directions for Media Literacy and Health Education (Center for Media Studies. Conference report: Setting research directions for media literacy and health education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University; 2001) stressed the need to document the different contexts, processes, and outcomes of health-focused media literacy education. Using this framework, we searched the literature since 1990 and analyzed over 20 health-promoting media literacy education projects designed to address dietary-related public health issues. This chapter examines the background for this study; outlines theoretical foundations, and presents an Integrated Individual and Interpersonal Health-Promoting Media Literacy Education Model; reviews five representative research studies that used a health-promoting media literacy education intervention to address nutrition, diet, body image, and eating disorders; and provides an analysis of what we know and what we still need to know to advance this field of public health practice and research on the impact of health-promoting media-literacy education on nutrition and diet behavior.


Body Image Eating Disorder Body Dissatisfaction Diet Behavior Media Message 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Body Mass Index


Eating Disorders Inventory-2


Eating Disorders Inventory-Body Dissatisfaction Scale


Media Attitudes Questionnaire


Physical Appearance Comparison Scale


Positive and Negative Affect Schedule


Physical Appearance State and Trait Anxiety Scale – Weight


Questionnaire for Eating Disorder Diagnosis


Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale


Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire


Social Cognitive Theory


Social Learning Theory


Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents


Theory of Planned Behavior


Theory of Reasoned Action


  1. Austin E, Johnson K. J Health Commun. 1997;2:17–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin EW, Pinkleton BE, Fujioka Y. Pediatrics. 2000;105:343–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranowski T, Domel S, Gould R. J Nutr Educ. 1993;25:114–20.Google Scholar
  4. Berel S, Irving L. J Prim Prev. 1998;18:415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergsma LJ. Am Behav Sci. 2004;48:152–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergsma LJ, Carney ME. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:522–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butters J, Cash T. J Consult Clin Psych. 1987;55:889–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Committee on Public Education American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2001;107:423–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corson PW, Andersen AE. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, editors. Body image: A handbook of theory, research and clinical practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2002. pp. 192–9.Google Scholar
  10. Coughlin J, Kalodner C. Body Image. 2006;3:35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeKorne C, Bergsma LJ, Doba S. Anti-drug education with the New York Times: focus on Marijuana. New York, NY: The New York Times Newspapers in Education; 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Doba S, Doukoullos ES. Media literacy for drug prevention: A unit for middle school educators. New York, NY: The New York Times Newspapers in Education; 2001.Google Scholar
  13. Dysart M. The effectiveness of media literacy and eating disorder prevention in schools: A controlled evaluation with 9th grade girls. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. Eating Disorders Awareness & Prevention. GO GIRLS!™: Giving our girls inspiration and resources for lasting self-esteem. Seattle, WA: Eating Disorders Awareness and Prevention, Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Heins M, Cho C. Media literacy: An alternative to censorship. New York, NY: Free Expression Policy Project; 2003.Google Scholar
  16. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum Publishing; 1970.Google Scholar
  17. Freire P. Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: The Continuum Publishing; 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Garner D. Eating disorder inventory-2: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Garner D. EDI-3: Eating disorder inventory professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Glanz K, Rimer BK. Theory at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice, 2nd ed.Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute; 2005.Google Scholar
  21. Grant J, Cash T. Behav Ther. 1995;26:69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harter S. Manual: Self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver; 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Heinberg L, Thompson J, Stormer S. Int J Eat Disorder. 1995;17:81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irving L, DuPen J, Berel S. Eat Disorder. 1998;6:119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irving L, Berel S. Psycho Women Quart. 2001;3:35–43.Google Scholar
  26. Kaiser Family Foundation. The role of media in childhood obesity. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2004.Google Scholar
  27. Kaiser Family Foundation. Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2005.Google Scholar
  28. Kilbourne J. Slim hopes: Advertising and the obsession with thinness. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation; 1995.Google Scholar
  29. Kilbourne J. Killing us softly III: Advertising images of women. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation; 1999.Google Scholar
  30. Levine M, Smolak L. The prevention of eating problems and eating disorders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006.Google Scholar
  31. Lorig K, Sobel D, Stewart A. Med Care. 1999;37:5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mintz L, O’Halloran M, Mulholland A, Schneider P. J Couns Psychol. 1997;44:63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Association for Media Literacy Education. Core principles of media literacy education in the United States. Cherry Hill, NJ; 2007.Google Scholar
  34. Neumark-Sztainer D, Sherwood NE, Coller T, Hannan PJ. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1466–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Cohen M, Chen Y, Fitzgerald E. Health Commun. 2008;23:462–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabak-Wagener J, Eickhoff-Shemek J, Kelly-Vance L. J Am Coll Health. 1998;47:29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reed D, Thompson J, Brannick M, Sacco W. J Anxiety Disord. 1991;5:323–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.Google Scholar
  39. Slade P, Newton T, Brodie D, Kiemle G. Psychol Health. 1990;4:213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strasburger V, Wilson B. Children, adolescents, and the media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.Google Scholar
  41. Striegel-Moore R, Bulik C. Am Psychol. 2007;62:181–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thoman E, Jolls T. Medialit kit—literacy for the 21st century: An overview and orientation guide to media literacy education. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Media Literacy; 2005.Google Scholar
  43. Thompson J, Heinberg L, Tantleff S. Behav Therapist. 1991;14:174–80.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson J, Heinberg L, Altabe M, Tanleff Dunn S. Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson J, van den Berg P, Roehrig M, Guarda A, Heinberg L. Int J Eat Disorder. 2004;35:293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watson D, Clark L, Tellegen A. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watson R, Vaughn L. Eat Disord. 2006;14:385–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public HealthUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizona

Personalised recommendations