Effect of Pregnancy and Consciousness Factors on Food-Related Behavior

  • J. K. Chun
  • S. W. Lim
  • W. I. Cho


Pregnancy is often accompanied by emesis gravidarum (EG), known as morning sickness, resulting in changes in dietary habits including food choice and level of appetite. Toward providing a theoretical approach for understanding EG, consciousness factors influencing food choice are described using a multilayered concept of consciousness. In order to apply these concepts to the EG phenomenon, food- and nonfood-related factors were categorized into relevant consciousness layers, and methodological considerations were addressed by employing the cognitive sensory evaluation questionnaire to integrate food-related stimuli into the stream of consciousness. Comparative case studies of pregnant (PY) and nonpregnant (PN) groups of women are presented to address how these groups differentially perceived and evaluated food-related stimuli. The problem of EG is discussed in terms of a two ego system, mother and fetus, sharing one food digestion system. This article covers research reported in several comparative studies on the food-related behaviors of PY and PN subject groups that demonstrated different responses to external objective food-related stimuli and internal subjective food-related stimuli. The differences between the two groups were remarkable and were validated by the results of the conventional food-related lifestyle survey. Interperception across the multiple layers of consciousness was explained via three-way-branching logic, whereby the dominance of the selfish layer of consciousness accounted for the different patterns of responses. Applications of the multilayered consciousness approach include the cognitive sensory evaluation of food and the representation of responses using bar-code and frequency patterns, musical notes, and virtual satiety with regard to obesity.


Food Consumption Food Choice Food Preference Dietary Behavior Sensorial Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



5th consciousness layer, numerical number refers to relevant consciousness layer: 6-CL, 7-CL, and 8-CL, 6th, 7th, and 8th consciousness layer, respectively


Cognitive sensory questionnaire


Emesis gravidarum


Food-related lifestyles


Multidimensional scaling


Women who had never been pregnant


Women who had been pregnant


Three-way branch transformation



We thank Kang C.J., Shin M.S., and Song S.O. for their contributions in the preparation of the document, and Sensometrics Co., Ltd. for data treatment.


  1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Psychol Bull. 1975;82:261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anacker S. Seven works of Vasubandhu. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass; 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Ashby, FG, Lee WW. J Exp Psychol General. 1991;120:150–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargh JA, Chaiken S, Raymond P, Hymes C. J Exp Psychol. 1996;32:104–28.Google Scholar
  5. Bell AC, Stewart AM, Radford AJ, Cairney PT. J Nutr Educ. 1981;13:22–6.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen DJ. Appetite 1992;19:233–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunsø K, Grunert KG. Adv Consum Res. 1995;22:475–80.Google Scholar
  8. Brunsø K, Scholderer J, Grunert KG. J Bus Res. 2003;57:665–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho WI, Chun JK. Presented at 2009 annual meeting of Korean Society of Food Science and Technology. Seoul, Korea; 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Chun JK. Food Eng Prog. 2002;6:288–99.Google Scholar
  11. Chun JK. Food Eng Prog. 2003;7:44–53.Google Scholar
  12. Chun JK. In: Ottaway PB, editor. The international review of food science and technology (2004/2005 Winter Ed). London: IUFoST, Sovereign Publications; 2004. p. 72–7.Google Scholar
  13. Churchland PM. Philos Sci. 1988;55:167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen G. Eur J Cogn Psychol. 2000;12:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cosper BA, Wakefield LM. J Am Diet Assoc. 1975;66:152–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dehaene S, Naccache L. Cognition 2001;79:1–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eertmans A, Baeyens F, Van den Bergh O. Health Educ Res. 2001;16:443–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eliasmith C, Thargard P. Cognitive Sci. 2001;25:245–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ennis DM. Food Technol-Chicago. 1998;52:78–89.Google Scholar
  20. Fazio RH, Sanbonmatsu DM, Powell MC, Kardes FR. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50:229–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fechner GT. Element of psychophysics: vol. 1. (Adler HE, Translator) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winstone; 1866, Original work published 1860.Google Scholar
  22. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Falk LW. Appetite 1996;26:247–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glanz K, Hewitt AM, Rudd J. J Nutr Educ. 1992;24:267–77.Google Scholar
  24. Glassman RB. Prog Neuro-Psychoph. 2000;4:163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grunert KG, Grunert SC. Int J Res Mark. 1995;12:209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herman CP, Polivy J. J Abnorm Psychol. 1975;84:666–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isaksson H, Sundberg B, Aman P, Fredriksson H, Olsson J. Food Nutr Res. 2008;52:1–7.Google Scholar
  28. Jin JH, Chun JK. MS thesis, Seoul National University; 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Kim SW, Lim SW, Chun JK. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2005;14:738–42.Google Scholar
  30. Kunde W, Kiesel A, Hoffmann J. Cognition 2003;88:223–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lau D, Krondl M, Coleman P. In: Galler JR, editor. Nutrition and behavior. New York: Plenum; 1984. p. 397–415.Google Scholar
  32. Lim SW, Chun JK. PhD thesis, Seoul National University; 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Lim SW, Chun JK, Cho WI. Appetite 2008;50:519–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meilgaard MC, Civille GV, Carr BT. Sensory evaluation techniques. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC; 2006.Google Scholar
  35. Meiselman HL. In: Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH, editors. Food choice, acceptance and consumption. London: Blackie Academic; 1996. p. 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michela J, Contento I. Health Psychol. 1986;5:209–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson JC, Reynolds TJ. In: Percy L, Woodside A, editors. Advertising and consumer psychology. Lexington: Lexington Books; 1983. p. 77–90.Google Scholar
  38. Ortega RM. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:1343–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Raftopoulos A. Cognitive Sci. 2001;25:423–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rappoport LH, Peters GR, Huff-Corzine L Downey RG. Ecol Food Nutr. 1992;28:171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosch E, Mervis C, Gray W, Johnson D, Boyes-Braem P. Cognitive Psychol. 1976;8:382–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rozin P, Tuorila H. Food Qual Prefer. 1993;4:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schifferstein HNJ. Acta Psychol. 2006;121:41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholderer J, Brunsø K, Grunert KG. Adv Consum Res. 2002;29:551–7.Google Scholar
  45. Scholderer J, Brunsø K, Bredahl L, Grunert KG. Appetite 2004;42:197–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shepherd R, Raats M. The psychology of food choice. Cambridge, MA: CABI; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shine SW, Chun JK. Food Eng Prog. 2004;8:242–8.Google Scholar
  48. Thurstone LL. Physiol Rev. 1927;34:273–86.Google Scholar
  49. Tuske J. Asian Philos. 1999;9:229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wansink B. Food Qual Prefer. 2003;14:23–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wells AJ. Cognitive Sci. 1998;22:269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food and Animal Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations