Sensory Education: French Perspectives

  • Caroline Reverdy


In everyday life, food learning is mainly implicit, and influences our food preferences. However, explicit sensory education is nowadays a growing phenomenon. It is established that the education of taste is influenced by several environmental factors such as culture, family, school meals, and the individual’s society. The sensory education examined in this paper is the French “Classes du Goût” method for children. This pedagogy seeks to develop food curiosity, refine taste, and enrich food vocabulary. This method is more and more widely used in Europe (France, Finland, The Netherlands, etc.). Its effects are visible in odor and taste identification and food characterization and description. To a lesser extent, sensory education also has a temporary effect of decreasing food neophobia and increasing the liking for complex food variants. Comparing sensory education and the older forms of dietary education shows that the former highlights the pleasure of taste, whereas the latter stresses good practice. On one hand, previous dietary education mainly comprised information without experience; family education, on the other, is based on experience plus parental pressure. Finally, sensory education provides experience, introduced by prior information, without parental pressure. From a practical point of view, these studies suggest the interest of encouraging cooking sessions in order to perpetuate good food behavior.


Food Preference Sensory Experience Implicit Learning School Meal Dietary Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Ensemble Prévenons l’Obésité des Enfants: Preventing Childhood Obesity Together


Programme National Nutrition Santé: French national diet and health program



My warmest thanks to Egon Peter Köster, who guided and supported me throughout my research on sensory education for children.

Warm thanks to Pascal Schlich, Christine Lange, and the Edusens team, who welcomed me in their dynamic team and with whom we set up the EduSens program.

Warm thanks to Dominique Montoux for reading over the text. She has used the Classes du Goût method with her pupils for 20 years, and is now running training in it as part of the Sapere and EPODE programs.

Many thanks to David Bravo, R&D Director for Pancosma, for encouraging me to write this chapter and for his precious corrections.


  1. Basdevant A, Boute D, Borys JM. Int J Obes. 1999;23(4):10–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlyne DE. In: Nebraska symposium on motivation. Arousal and reinforcement. University of Nebraska Press; 1967. p.1-100.Google Scholar
  3. Berlyne DE. Percept Psychophys. 1970;8:279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birch LL. Child Dev. 1980;51:489–96.Google Scholar
  5. Borys JM. Nutr Services, Jan 2003:1–2Google Scholar
  6. Borys JM, Lafay L. Rev Méd Suisse Romande. 2000;120:207–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borys JM, Boute D, Thomas F, Fontbonne A, Eschwege E. Cahiers Nutri Diet. 1993;28(3):177–80.Google Scholar
  8. Brouet I. Imp Médec, 16 May 2003Google Scholar
  9. Canac P, Samuel C, Socquet-Juglard S. InterEditions; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Carper JL, Orlet Fisher J, Birch LL. Appetite. 2000;35:121–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daviet C. La Santé de l’Homme. 2001 March-April: 352Google Scholar
  12. Dember WN, Earl RW. Psychol Rev. 1957;64(2):91–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanse L (1994) Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Paris X-Nanterre University, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  14. Jonsson IM, Ekström MP, Gustafsson IB. Int J Consumer Stud. 2005;29:78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Köster EP. Food ingredients Europe conference proceedings 1990. The Netherlands: Expoconsult, Maarssen; 1990. p. 32–7.Google Scholar
  16. Köster EP, Mojet J. In: MacFie HJH, editor. Consumer-led food product development. Abington, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2007. p. 262–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lévy CM, MacRae A, Köster EP. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006;123:394–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loewen R, Pliner P. Appetite. 1999;32(3):351–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maier AS, Leathwood P, Chabanet C, Issanchou S, Schaal B. Chem Senses. 2006;31:E5.Google Scholar
  20. Ministère de l’éducation nationale (2001) BO spécial n°9, 28 June 2001: 6Google Scholar
  21. Mustonen S, Rantanen R, Tuorila H. Food Qual Prefer. 2009;20(3):230–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Öström A, Annett J. A sense of innovation, 3rd European conference on sensory and consumer research, Hamburg, Germany; 7–10 September 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Pautrel D. Cahier Espaces. December 2002;76:27–30.Google Scholar
  24. Pliner P, Salvy SJ. In: Shepherd R, Raats M, editors. The psychology of food choice. Wallingford, Oxon: CABI; 2006. p. 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pliner P, Pelchat M, Grabski M. Appetite. 1993;20:111–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Puisais J. Le goût chez l’enfant, l’apprentissage en famille. Flammarion; 1999.Google Scholar
  27. Puisais J, Pierre C. Le goût et l’enfant. Flammarion; 1987Google Scholar
  28. Puisais J, Mac Leod P, Politzer N. Le Goût et les 5 Sens, Compact disc – read only memory, Odile Jacob Multimédia-SCEREN; 2002.Google Scholar
  29. Rampillon L, Gruyer-Watrin J. Jeux et exercices en vue de l’éducation sensorielle et mentale des jeunes enfants et qui est destiné aux institutrices maternelles et aux mères de famille. Librairie de l’enfance, Paris, 2nd edition; 1930.Google Scholar
  30. Reverdy C. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France; 2008.Google Scholar
  31. Reverdy C, Schlich P, Köster EP, Ginon E, Lange C. Food Qual Prefer. 2010a;21:794-804.Google Scholar
  32. Reverdy C, Lange C, Thibaut A, Schlich P, Köster EP. 32nd Achems Annual Meeting, 21–25 April 2010, St. Pete Beach, USA; 2010b.Google Scholar
  33. Reverdy C, Lange C, Thibaut A, Schlich P, Köster EP. 20th ECRO Congress, 14–19 September 2010, Avignon, France; 2010c.Google Scholar
  34. Reverdy C, Lange C, Schlich P. A sense of identity, 1st European conference on sensory science of food and beverages, 26–29 September 2004, Florence, Italy; 2004.Google Scholar
  35. Reverdy C, Chesnel F, Schlich P, Köster EP, Lange C. Appetite. 2008;51:156–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rolland-Cachera MF, Bellisle F. In: Burniat W, Lissau I, Cole TJ, editors. The obese and overweight child. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 69–92.Google Scholar
  37. Schaal B, Marlier L, Soussignan R. Chem Senses. 2000;25:729–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stratégies. 1428, 5 Oct. 10, 2006:24.Google Scholar
  39. Thareau Dupire MC. Mon enfant mange de tout. Paris: Leduc S Editions; 2006.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas D. Pano Méd. 2003;4874:40.Google Scholar
  41. Ton Nu C. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, ENGREF, Paris, France; 1996.Google Scholar
  42. Walker EL. Enduring effects of occurrence of psychological events, psychological complexity and preference: a hedgehog theory of behavior. Monterey: Brook/Cole; 1980. p. 129–96.Google Scholar
  43. Wardle J, Cooke LJ, Gibson EL, Sapochnik M, Sheiman A, Lawson M. Appetite. 2003;40:155–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zajonc RB. J Personality Social Psychol Monogr Suppl. 1968;9(2):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AUXIME - ODOROSMÊ, Les Grandes RochesSaint Romain de PopeyFrance
  2. 2.R&D DepartmentPANCOSMALe Grand SaconnexSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations