Advertisement

Computerized Adaptive Testing Using MIRT

  • Mark D. Reckase
Chapter
Part of the Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences book series (SSBS)

Abstract

Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is a methodology for constructing a test, administering it to an examinee, and scoring the test using interactive computer technology. This methodology has a history that is as long as that of interactive computing. An early summary of CAT methods is given in Weiss (1974). A detailed description of the development of an operational application for the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery is given in (Sands 1997). There are also several books available that describe the basic components of CAT procedures (Wainer, Dorans, Flaugher, Green, Mislevy, Steinberg and Thissen 1990; Parshall, Spray and Davey 2002; van der Linden and Glas 2000) so the basic details of the methodology are not presented here. A review of that literature will show that most of the current CAT methodology is based on the assumption that a unidimensional IRT model accurately represents the interaction between persons and test items. In this chapter, the generalization of the CAT methodology to the multidimensional case is considered. To provide a framework for this material, a brief summary of the conceptual basis for CAT is provided.

Keywords

Test Item Item Parameter Fisher Information Matrix Item Bank Item Pool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chang H-H, Ying Z (1996) A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement 20:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lehmann EL, Casella G (1998) Theory of point estimation (2nd edition). Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee Y-H, Ip EH, Fuh C-D (2008) A strategy for controlling item exposure in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 68:215–232CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Owen RJ (1975) A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70:351–356CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Parshall CG, Spray JA, Davey T (2002) Practical considerations in computer-based testing. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Segall DO (1996) Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika 61:331–354CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. van der Linden WJ, Glas CAW (eds) (2000) Computerized adaptive testing: theory and practice. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Warm TA (1989) Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika 54:427–450CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiss DJ (1974) Strategies of adaptive ability measurement (Research Report 74-5). Psychometric Methods Program, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Counseling, Educational, Psychology, and Special Education DepartmentMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations