The Relationship Between Small- and Large-Scale Movements of Horseshoe Crabs in the Great Bay Estuary and Limulus Behavior in the Laboratory

  • Winsor H. WatsonIII
  • Susanne Y. Schaller
  • Christopher C. Chabot


The overall goal of our research program is to determine the short- and long-term patterns of horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) movements in the Great Bay estuary and then seek an understanding of the endogenous and exogenous processes that give rise to these patterns. Small- and large-scale movement data were obtained from 27 horseshoe crabs tracked using ultrasonic telemetry for at least a year. During mating season animals were most active during high tides, but they did not increase their activity or approach mating beaches during every high tide. During the remainder of the year tidal or daily patterns of activity were less evident, and the extent of their movements gradually decreased as water temperatures dropped in the late fall and winter. During the spring, when water temperatures exceeded 10°C, tagged animals moved several km up into the estuary into shallow water (< 4 m) 1 month prior to spawning. A similar temperature threshold was also evident in laboratory experiments, with little rhythmic behavior expressed at temperatures below 11°C. Mating activity lasted approximately 1 month and was followed by a period of high activity. In the fall, most animals moved downriver into deeper water, where they remained during the colder months. Thus, the majority of Limulus exhibited a seasonal pattern of movement, remaining within a 3 km stretch of the estuary. In the laboratory, animals expressed both daily and tidal rhythms of locomotion. Those with daily rhythms were more likely to be diurnal than nocturnal, but both tendencies were evident. The clock involved in modulating their locomotory activity appears to be separate from the clock controlling their circadian rhythm of visual sensitivity. When animals were exposed to “artificial tides”, created by changing water depth every 12.4 hours, they expressed clear tidal rhythms of activity that were synchronized to the imposed tides. Similar data were obtained from horseshoe crabs in running wheels placed in the estuary. However, if the running wheels were attached to a floating dock, so water depth did not change with the tides, the horseshoe crabs were primarily diurnal. Thus, while endogenous biological clocks are capable of controlling many aspects of horseshoe crab locomotion, the actual patterns manifested in the field are strongly influenced by the water depth changes associated with the tides, as well as light levels and seasonal changes in water temperature.


Circadian Clock High Tide Tidal Cycle Mating Season Horseshoe Crab 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abelló P, Reid DG, Naylor E (1991) Comparative locomotor activity patterns in the Portunid crabs Liocarcinus holsatus and L. depurator. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 71:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow RB (1983) Circadian rhythms in the Limulus visual system. J. Neuroscience 3:856–870.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow RB, Chamberlain SC, Levinson JZ (1980) Limulus brain modulates the structure and function of the lateral eyes. Science 210:1037–1039.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow RB, Powers MK, Howard H, Kass L (1986) Migration of Limulus for mating: relation to lunar phase, tide height, and sunlight. Biol Bull 171:310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brockmann, HJ (2003) Nesting behavior: a shoreline phenomenon. In: Shuster CN Jr, Barlow RB, Brockmann HJ (eds) The American Horseshoe Crab. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. MA, pp.33–49.Google Scholar
  6. Chabot CC, Kent J, Watson WH III (2004) Circatidal and circadian rhythms of locomotion in Limulus polyphemus. Biol Bull 207:72–75.Google Scholar
  7. Chabot CC, Betournay SH, Braley NR, Watson WH III (2007) Endogenous rhythms of locomotion in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 345:79–89.Google Scholar
  8. Chabot CC, Skinner S, Watson WH III (2008) Artificial tides synchronize circatidal rhythms of locomotion in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Biol. Bull 215:34–45.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen JA, Brockmann HJ (1983) Breeding activity and mate selection in the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Bul Mar Sci 33(2):274–281.Google Scholar
  10. Crossin G, Jury SH, Watson WH III (1998) Behavioral thermoregulation in the American lobster, Homarus americanus. J Exp Biol 201:365–74.Google Scholar
  11. Dufort CG, Jury SH, Newcomb JM, O’Grady DF III, Watson WH III (2001) Detection of salinity by the lobster, Homarus americanus. Biol. Bull 201:424–434.Google Scholar
  12. Ehlinger GS, Tankersley RA (2006) Endogenous rhythms and entrainment cues of larval activity in the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 337:205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forward RB, Douglass JK, Kenney BE (1986) Entrainment of the larval release rhythm of the crab Rhithropanopeus harrissii by cycles of salinity change. Mar Biol 90:537–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser PJ (2006) Review: depth, navigation and orientation in crabs: angular acceleration, gravity and hydrostatic pressure sensing during path integration. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 39(2):87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golet WJ, Scopel DA, Cooper AB, Watson WH III (2006) Daily patterns of locomotion expressed by American lobsters (Homarus americanus) in their natural habitat. J Crust Biol 26(4):610–620.Google Scholar
  16. Hastings MH (1981) The entraining effect of turbulence on the circa-tidal activity rhythm and its semi-lunar modulation in Eurydice pulchra. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 61:151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jury SH, Kinnison MT, Howell WH, Watson WH III (1994) The behavior of lobsters in response to reduced salinity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 180:23–37.Google Scholar
  18. Jury SH, Howell WH, Watson WH III (1995) Lobster movements in response to a hurricane. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 119:305–310.Google Scholar
  19. Jury SH, Watson WH III (2000) Thermosensitivity of the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Biol Bull 199(3):257–264.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan E, Barlow RB (1980) Circadian clock in Limulus brain increases response and decreases noise of retinal photoreceptors. Nature 286:393–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klapow LA (1972). Natural and artificial rephasing of a tidal rhythm. J Comp Physiol 79:233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macdonald AG, Fraser PJ (1999) The transduction of very small hydrostatic pressures. Comp Biochem Physiol (A) 122:13–36.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan E (1984) The pressure-responses of marine invertebrates: a psychophysical perspective. Zool J Linn Soc 80:209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Naylor E, Atkinson RJ (1972). Pressure and the rhythmic behavior of inshore marine animals. In: Sleigh M, Alister G (eds), The Effects of Pressure on Organisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 395–415.Google Scholar
  25. Northcutt SJ, Gibson RN, Morgan E (1991) On-shore entrainment of circatidal rhymicity in Lipophrys pholis by natural zeitgeber and the inhibitory effect of caging. Mar Behav Physiol 19:63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palmer JD (1995) The Biological Rhythms and Clocks of Intertidal Animals. Oxford University Press. New York.Google Scholar
  27. Rudloe A (1980) The breeding behavior and patterns of movement of horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus, in the vicinity of breeding beaches in Apalachee bay, Florida. Estuaries 3:177-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson WH III, Vetrovs A, Howell WH (1999) Lobster movements in an estuary. Mar Biol 134:65–75.Google Scholar
  29. Watson, WH III, Bedford L, Chabot CC (2008) Dissociation between circadian rhythms of visual sensitivity and circatidal rhythms of locomotion in the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. Biol. Bull 215:46–56.Google Scholar
  30. Williams BG, Naylor E (1969). Synchronization of the locomotor tidal rhythm of Carcinus J Exp Biol 51:715–725.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Winsor H. WatsonIII
    • 1
  • Susanne Y. Schaller
    • 1
  • Christopher C. Chabot
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesPlymouth State UniversityPlymouthUSA

Personalised recommendations