Advertisement

Horseshoe Crabs – An Ancient Ancestry Revealed

  • D. M. Rudkin
  • G. A. Young

Abstract

The fossil record of the basic xiphosurid horseshoe crab body plan has been extended back to the Late Ordovician Period, about 445 million years ago, demonstrating an origin that lies outside of the paraphyletic ‘synziphosurines.’ Horseshoe crab body fossils are exceptionally rare and are found mostly in shallow coastal and marginal marine Konservat-Lagerstätten deposits. Their sporadic occurrences document a post-Cambrian history of low overall diversity with a modest morphological and taxonomic peak in the Late Paleozoic Era. Survival of a single xiphosurid lineage through the end-Permian mass extinction events was followed by a minor secondary radiation during the Triassic Period. The Jurassic to Recent fossil record of horseshoe crabs is relatively impoverished in both taxa and known occurrences. Overall, the rarity of fossil xiphosurids reflects both taphonomic biases inherent in the unusual conditions required for preservation of their non-biomineralized exoskeletons and complex ecological factors related to a long-term association with shallow marginal aquatic habitats. Focused paleontological investigations should yield additional fossil horseshoe crab discoveries that will in turn inform research on their phylogeny, morphological stasis, and ecological persistence.

Keywords

Fossil Record Horseshoe Crab Late Ordovician Taphonomic Process Burgess Shale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), The Manitoba Museum Foundation, the Board of Governors of the Royal Ontario Museum, and the Churchill Northern Studies Centre (CNSC) for financial and logistical support of fieldwork and research on Ordovician xiphosurids and Lagerstätten. Rudkin’s invited attendance at the 2007 International Symposium on the Science and Conservation of Horseshoe Crabs was generously funded by conference sponsors and organizers, and he is indebted to all involved for the opportunity to participate.

References

  1. Allen JG, Feldmann RM (2005) Panduralimulus babcocki n. gen. and sp., a new limulacean horseshoe crab from the Permian of Texas. J Paleontol 79:594–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison PA, Briggs DEG (1991) Taphonomy of nonmineralized tissues. In: Allison PA, Briggs DEG (eds) Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. Plenum Press, New York, pp 26–70Google Scholar
  3. Allmon WD (2001) Marine benthic communities. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR (eds) Palaeobiology II. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez W (1998) T. rex and the Crater of Doom. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson LI (1996) Taphonomy and taxonomy of Palaeozoic Xiphosura. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson LI, Dunlop JA, Horrocks CA, Winkelmann HM, Eagar RMC (1997) Exceptionally preserved fossils from Bickershaw, Lancashire UK (Upper Carboniferous, Westphalian A (Langsettian)). Geol J 32:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson LI, Selden PA (1997) Opisthosomal fusion and phylogeny of Palaeozoic Xiphosura. Lethaia 30:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson LI, Shuster CN Jr (2003) Throughout geologic time: where have they lived? In: Shuster CN Jr, Barlow RB, Brockman H J (eds) The American Horseshoe Crab. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 189–223Google Scholar
  9. Avise JC, Nelson WS, Sugita H (1994) A speciational history of “living fossils”: molecular evolutionary patterns in horseshoe crabs. Evolution 46:1986–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Babcock LE, Merriam DF, West RR (2000) Paleolimulus, an early limuline (Xiphosurida), from Pennsylvanian-Permian Lagerstätten of Kansas and taphonomic comparison with modern Limulus. Lethaia 33:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barthel KW, Swinburne NHM, Conway Morris S (1990) Solnhofen – A study in Mesozoic palaeontology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergström J (1968) Eolimulus, a Lower Cambrian xiphosurid from Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar 90:489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergström J (1975) Functional morphology and evolution of xiphosurids. Fossils and Strata 4:291–305Google Scholar
  14. Bottjer DJ, Etter W, Hagadorn JW, Tang CM (eds) (2002) Exceptional Fossil Preservation – A Unique View on the Evolution of Marine Life. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Briggs DEG (2001) Exceptionally preserved fossils. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR (eds) Palaeobiology II. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp 328–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Briggs DEG, Collins DH (1988) A Middle Cambrian chelicerate from Mount Stephen, British Columbia. Palaeontology 31:779–798Google Scholar
  17. Briggs DEG, Fortey RA (2005) Wonderful strife: systematics, stem groups, and the phylogenetic signal of the Cambrian radiation. Paleobiology 31 (Supplement):94–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Briggs DEG, Moore RA, Schultz JW, Schweigert G (2005) Mineralization of soft-part anatomy and invading microbes in the horseshoe crab Mesolimulus from the Upper Jurassic Lagerstätte of Nusplingen, Germany. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol 272:627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Budd GE (2008) Head structure in upper stem-group euarthropods. Palaeontology 51:561–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chatterjee S, Guven N, Yoshinobu A, Donofrio R (2006) Shiva structure: a possible KT boundary impact crater on the western shelf of India. Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University 50, 39 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen J, Waloszek D, Maas A (2004) A new ‘great-appendage’ arthropod from the Lower Cambrian of China and homology of chelicerate chelicerae and raptorial antero-ventral appendages. Lethaia 37:3–20Google Scholar
  22. Cotton TJ, Braddy SJ (2004) The phylogeny of arachnomorph arthropods and the origin of the Chelicerata. In: Braddy SJ, Clarkson ENK (eds) Chelicerate Palaeobiology and Evolution. Trans Roy Soc Edinburgh (Earth Sci) 94:169–193Google Scholar
  23. Crônier C, Courville P (2005) New xiphosuran merostomata from the Upper Carboniferous of the Graissessac Basin (Massif Central, France). Comptes Rendus Palevol 4:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunlop JA, Selden PA (1997) The early history and phylogeny of the chelicerates. In: Fortey RA, Thomas RH (eds) Arthropod Relationships. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 55. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp 221–235Google Scholar
  25. Edgecombe GD, Wilson GDF, Colgan DJ, Gray MR, Cassis G (2000) Arthropod cladistics: combined analysis of histone H3 and U2 snRNA sequences and morphology. Cladistics 16:155–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eldredge N (1974) Revision of the suborder Synziphosurina (Chelicerata: Merostomata), with remarks on merostome phylogeny. Am Mus Novit 2543:1–41Google Scholar
  27. Erwin DH, Bowring SA, Yugan J (2002) End-Permian mass extinctions: a review. In: Koeberl C, MacLoed KG (eds) Catastrophic events and mass extinctions. Geological Society of America Special Paper 356, pp 363–383Google Scholar
  28. Ewington DL, Clarke MJ, Banks MR (1989) A Late Permian fossil horseshoe crab (Paleolimulus: Xiphosura) from Poatina, Great Western Tiers, Tasmania. Roy Soc Tasmania Papers Proc 123:127–131Google Scholar
  29. Fisher DC (1979) Evidence for subaerial activity of Euproops danae (Merostomata, Xiphosurida). In: Nitecki MH (ed) Mazon Creek Fossils. Academic Press, New York, pp 379–447Google Scholar
  30. Fisher DC (1982) Phylogenetic and macroevolutionary patterns within the Xiphosurida. In: Mamet B, Copeland MJ (eds) Proceedings of the Third North American Paleontological Convention. Montreal, pp 175–180Google Scholar
  31. Fisher DC (1984) The Xiphosurida: archetypes of bradytely? In: Eldredge N, Stanley SM (eds) Living Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 196–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fortey, R (2000) Trilobite! Eyewitness to Evolution. Harper Collins, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Giribet G, Richter S, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC (2005) The position of crustaceans within Arthropoda – evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA (eds) Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 307–352Google Scholar
  34. Gupta NS, Tetlie OE, Briggs DEG, Pancost RD (2007) The fossilization of eurypterids: a result of molecular transformation. Palaios 22:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hendricks JR, Lieberman BS (2008) New phylogenetic insights into the Cambrian radiation of arachnomorph arthropods. J Paleontol 82:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kamenz C, Dunlop JA, Scholtz G, Kerp H, Hass, H (2008) Microanatomy of Early Devonian book lungs. Biol Lett 4:212–215 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.597)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kidwell SM (2001) Major biases in the fossil record. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR (eds) Palaeobiology II. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kraus O (1976) Zur phylogenetische Stellung und Evolution der Chelicerata. Entomol Ger 3:1–12Google Scholar
  39. Malz H, Poschmann M (1993) Erste Süsswasser-Limuliden (Arthropoda, Chelicerata) aus dem Rotliegenden der Saar-Nahe-Senke. Osnabrücker naturwissenschaftlich Mitteilung 19:21–34Google Scholar
  40. Martin RE (1999) Taphonomy: A Process Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 508 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meischner K-D (1962) Neue Funde von Psammolimulus gottingensis (Merostomata, Xiphosura) aus dem Mittleren Buntsandstein von Göttingen. Paläontol Z (H Schmidt Festband):185–193Google Scholar
  42. Mikulic DG (1997) Xiphosura. In: Shabica CW, Hay AA (eds) Richardson’s Guide to the Fossils Fauna and Flora of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, pp 134–139Google Scholar
  43. Moore RA, Braddy SJ (2005) A glyptocystid cystoid affinity for the putative stem group chelicerate (Arthropoda: Aglaspidida or Xiphosura) Lemoneites from the Ordovician of Texas, USA. Lethaia 38:293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore RA, Briggs DEG, Bartels C (2005a) A new specimen of Weinbergina opitzi (Chelicerata: Xiphosura) from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany. Paläontol Z 79:399–408Google Scholar
  45. Moore RA, Briggs DEG, Braddy SJ, Anderson LI, Mikulic DG, Kluessendorf J (2005b) A new synziphosurine (Chelicerata: Xiphosura) from the Late Llandovery (Silurian) Waukesha Lagerstätte, Wisconsin, USA. J Paleontol 79:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore RA, McKenzie SC, Lieberman BS (2007) A Carboniferous synziphosurine (Xiphosura) from the Bear Gulch Limestone, Montana, USA. Palaeontology 50:1013–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ocampo A, Vajda V, Buffetaut E (2006) Unraveling the Cretaceous–Paleogene (KT) turnover, evidence from flora, fauna and geology. In: Cockell C, Gilmour I, Koeberl C (eds) Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events. Springer, Berlin, pp 197–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pickett J (1984) A new freshwater limuloid from the Middle Triassic of New South Wales. Palaeontology 27:609–621Google Scholar
  49. Pisani D, Poling LL, Lyons-Weiler M, Blair-Hedges S (2004) The colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods. BioMed Central: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/2/1
  50. Racheboeuf PR, Vannier J, Anderson LI (2002) A new three-dimensionally preserved xiphosuran chelicerate from the Montceau-Les-Mines Lagerstätte (Carboniferous, France). Palaeontology 45:125–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reeside JB Jr, Harris DV (1952) A Cretaceous horseshoe crab from Colorado. J Wash Acad Sci 42:174–178Google Scholar
  52. Riek EF (1955) A new xiphosuran from the Triassic sediments at Brookvale, New South Wales. Rec Aust Mus 23:281–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Riek EF (1968) A re-examination of two arthropod species from the Triassic of Brookvale, New South Wales. Rec Aust Mus 27:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Riek EF, Gill ED (1971) A new xiphosuran genus from Lower Cretaceous freshwater sediments at Koonwarra, Victoria, Australia. Palaeontology 14:206–210Google Scholar
  55. Rudkin DM, Young GA, Nowlan GS (2008) The oldest horseshoe crab: a new xiphosurid from Late Ordovician Konservat-Lagerstätten deposits, Manitoba, Canada. Palaeontology 51:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD (2005) Heads, Hox, and the phylogenetic position of trilobites. In: Koenemann S, Jenner RA (eds) Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 139–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD (2006) The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence. Devel Genes Evol 216:395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seilacher A (2007) Trace Fossil Analysis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  59. Seilacher A, Reif W-E, Westphal F (1985) Sedimentological, ecological and temporal controls of fossil Lagerstätten. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 311:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Selden PA, Dunlop JA (1998) Fossil taxa and relationships of chelicerates. In: Edgecombe GD (ed) Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 303–331Google Scholar
  61. Selden PA, Nudds J (2004) Evolution of Fossil Ecosystems. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  62. Selden PA, Siveter DJ (1987) The origin of the limuloids. Lethaia 20:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shuster CN Jr, Anderson LI (2003) A history of skeletal structure: clues to relationships among species. In: Shuster CN Jr, Barlow RB, Brockman HJ (eds) The American Horseshoe Crab. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 154–188Google Scholar
  64. Siveter DJ, Sutton MD, Briggs DEG, Siveter DJ (2004) A Silurian sea spider. Nature 431:978–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stankiewicz BA, Briggs DEG (2001) Animal cuticles. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR (eds) Palaeobiology II. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 259–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Størmer L (1952) Phylogeny and taxonomy of fossil horseshoe crabs. J Paleontol 26:630–639Google Scholar
  67. Tanacredi JT (ed) (2001) Limulus in the Limelight. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Tetlie OE (2007) Distribution and dispersal history of Eurypterida (Chelicerata). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 252:557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tetlie OE, Cuggy MB (2007) Phylogeny of the basal swimming eurypterids (Chelicerata; Eurypterida; Eurypterina). J Syst Palaeontol 5:345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vía L (1987) Artropodos fosiles Triàsicos de Alcover-Montral. II. Limulidos. Cuadernos Geol Ibérica 11:281–292Google Scholar
  71. Walls EA, Berkson J, Smith SA (2002) The horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus: 200 million years of existence, 100 years of study. Rev Fish Sci 10:39–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waloszek D, Dunlop JA (2002) A larval sea spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) from the Upper Cambrian ‘orsten’ of Sweden, and the phylogenetic position of the pycnogonids. Palaeontology 45:421–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Waloszek D, Chen J, Maas A, Wang X (2005) Early Cambrian arthropods – new insights into arthropod head and structural evolution. Arthropod Struct Dev 34:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Waloszek D, Maas A, Chen J, Stein M (2007) Evolution of cephalic feeding structures and the phylogeny of Arthropoda. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 254:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wills MA (1996) Classification of the arthropod Fuxianhuia. Science 272:746–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woodward H (1879) On the occurrence of a fossil king-crab (Limulus syriacus) in the Cretaceous formation of Lebanon. Q J Geol Soc Lond 35:554–555Google Scholar
  77. Xia Xuhua (2000) Phylogenetic relationship among horseshoe crab species: effect of substitution models on phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49:87–100Google Scholar
  78. Yin H, Warrington G, Xie S (eds) (2007) Environmental and biotic changes during the Paleozoic-Mesozoic transition. Glob Planet Change 55:(1–3), 236Google Scholar
  79. Young GA, Rudkin DM, Dobrzanski EP, Robson SP, Nowlan GS (2007) Exceptionally preserved Late Ordovician biotas from Manitoba, Canada. Geology 35:883–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural History – PaleobiologyRoyal Ontario MuseumTorontoCanada
  2. 2.The Manitoba MuseumWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations