Vision in Horseshoe Crabs



Limulus has been a superb animal model for understanding vision in higher animals, including man. Nobel-prize winning research on the lateral eye of Limulus by H. K. Hartline revealed fundamental principles of retinal function applicable to all eyes. The function of the Limulus lateral eye is now well understood as is its essential role in the animal’s mating behavior.


Optic Nerve Lateral Inhibition Horseshoe Crab Neural Code Marine Biological Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adolph A (1964) Spontaneous slow potential fluctuations in the Limulus photoreceptor. J Gen Physiol 48: 297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atherton JL, Krutky MA, Hitt JM, Dodge FA, Barlow RB (2000) Optic nerve responses of Limulus in its natural habitat at night. Biol Bull 199:176–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow RB (1969) Inhibitory fields in the Limulus lateral eye. J Gen Physiol 54:383–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow RB, Kaplan E (1971) Limulus lateral eye: properties of receptor units in the unexcised eye. Science 174:1027–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow RB, Lange GD (1974) A nonlinearity in the inhibitory interactions in the lateral eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol 63:579–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow RB, Quarles DA Jr (1975). Mach bands in the lateral eye of Limulus: Comparison of theory and experiment. J Gen Physiol 65:709–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlow RB, Bolanowski SJ, Brachman (1977) Efferent optic nerve fibers mediate circadian rhythms in the Limulus eye. Science 197:86–89Google Scholar
  8. Barlow RB, Ireland LC, Kass L (1982) Vision has a role in Limulus mating behavior. Nature 296:65–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barlow RB (1986) From string galvanometer to digital computer: Haldane Keffer Harline (1903–1983) Trends Neurosci 6:552–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barlow RB, Powers MK, Howard H, Kass L (1986) Migration of Limulus for mating: relation to lunar phase tide height and sunlight. Biol Bull 171:310–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barlow RB, Chamberlain SC, Lehman HK (1989) Circadian rhythms in invertebrate vision. In Stavenga DC, Hardie RC (eds) Facets of Vision. Springer-Verlag Berlin, pp 257–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barlow RB, Hitt JM, Dodge FA (2001). Limulus vision in the marine environment. Biol Bull 200:169–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodge FA Jr, Knight BW, Toyoda J (1968) Voltage noise in Limulus. Nature 217:28–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham CH, Hartline HK (1935) The response of single visual sense cells to lights of different wave lengths. J Gen Physiol 18:917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartline HK (1928) A quantitative and descriptive study of the electric response to illumination of the arthropod eye. Am J Physiol 83:466–483Google Scholar
  16. Hartline HK, Graham CH (1932) Nerve impulses from single receptors in the eye. J Cell Comp Physiol 1: 227–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartline HK (1934) Intensity and duration in the excitation of single photoreceptor units. J Cell Comp Physiol 5:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartline HK, MacDonald PR (1947) Light and dark adaptation of single photoreceptor elements in the eye of Limulus. J Cell Comp Physiol 30:225–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartline HK, Wagner HG, MacNichol EF Jr (1952) The peripheral origin of nervous activity in the visual system. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant Biol 17:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartline HK, Wagner HG, Ratliff F (1956) Inhibition in the eye of Limulus J Gen Physiol 39:651–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartline HK, Ratliff F (1957) Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol 40:357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartline HK, Ratliff F (1958) Spatial summation of inhibitory influences in the eye of Limulus and the mutual interaction of receptor units. J Gen Physiol 41:1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartline HK (1969) Visual receptors and retinal interaction. Science 164:270–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hecht S, Shlaer S, Pirenne MP (1942) Energy quanta and vision. J Gen Physiol 25:819–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herzog E, Barlow RB (1992) Limulus-eye view of the world. Visual Neurosci 9: 571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herzog E, Powers MK, Barlow RB (1996) Limulus vision day and night: effects of image size and contrast. Visual Neurosci 13: 31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hitt JM, Ruta V, Dodge FA, Barlow RB (2000) Explaining night vision in Limulus. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 41:S28Google Scholar
  28. Hubbard R, Wald G (1960) Visual pigment of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Nature 186:212–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacNichol EF Jr (1956) Visual receptors as biological transducers in molecular structure and functional activity of nerve cells. Am Inst Biol Sci Publ 1:34Google Scholar
  30. Mori K, Saito T, Dodge FA, Barlow RB (2007) How do “contrast cells” in the Limulus brain respond to contrast? SFN Abstracts Annual Meeting, Abstract 506.13Google Scholar
  31. Passaglia CL (1997) What the Limulus eye tells the Limulus brain. Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Passaglia CL, Dodge FA, Herzog EH, Jackson S, Barlow RB (1997) Deciphering a neural code for vision. Proc Nat Acad Sci 94: 12649–12654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Passaglia CL, Dodge FA, Barlow RB (1998) A cell-based model of the Limulus lateral eye. J Neurophysiol 80: 1800–1815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Powers MK, Barlow RB, Kass L (1991) Visual performance of horseshoe crabs day and night. Visual Neurosci 7:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ratliff F, Knight BW, Toyoda J, Hartline HK (1967) Enhancement of flicker by lateral inhibition. Science 158:392–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ratliff F (1974) Studies on Excitation and Inhibition in the Retina. Rockefeller University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Ratliff F, Knight BW Jr, Dodge FA Jr, Hartline HK (1974) Fourier analysis of dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the eye of Limulus: amplitude phase and distance. Vision Res 14: 1155–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ridings C, Borst D, Smith K, Dodge F, Barlow R (2002) Visual behavior of juvenile Limulus in their natural habitat and in captivity. Biol Bull 203:224–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snodderly DM Jr (1971) Processing of visual inputs by brain of Limulus. J Neurophysiol 34:588–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tomita T (1956) The nature of action potentials in the lateral eye of the horseshoe crab as revealed by simultaneous intra- and extracellular recording. Jpn J Physiol 6:27–340Google Scholar
  41. Wilska A, Hartline HK (1941) The origin of “off-responses” in the optic pathway Am J Physiol 133: 491Google Scholar
  42. Yeandle S (1958) Evidence of quantized slow potentials in the eye of Limulus. Am J Ophthalmol 46:82–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Vision ResearchSUNY Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations