Advertisement

Introducing Autonomous Behaviors into IMS-Based Architectures

  • Mohamed Boucadair
Chapter

Abstract

The main objective of this chapter is to describe a set of viable solutions aiming to enhance the robustness and the availability of current IMS-based architectures owing to the activation of autonomic-like techniques. This chapter adopts a Service Provider standpoint and clarifies the scope of autonomic behaviors within an administrative service domain owned and managed by a Service Provider. The rationale elaborated within this chapter argues in favor of introducing autonomic and distributed means into current operational service platforms in order to build survival and deterministic networks. Autonomic networking means are not used as alternative solutions but as an enhancement to the already deployed ones. For backward compatibility and for migration issues, this chapter recommends to enforce the proposed solutions as backup ones in the earlier stages of deployment. Once field proven, the proposed mechanisms could be enforced as primary procedures to deliver more sophisticated services. This chapter investigates how autonomic networking and more precisely distributed techniques may be implemented and engineered in the context of IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS)-based architectures. This effort is required so as to disseminate autonomic networking inside Telcos community mainly by proposing concrete and viable solutions which meet operational requirements. This chapter does not require specific background on autonomic networking and computing.

Keywords

Service Provider Sessions Initiation Protocol Service Platform Core Node Service Offering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Boyle et al., “The COPS Protocol”, RFC 2748, IETF, January 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Boucadair et al., “Challenges of Next Generation Conversational Services: Quality of Service and Migration to IPv6”, Proc. of the 8th GRES’07 Colloquium, Tunisia, November 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Boucadair, Y. Noisette, “Migrating SIP-Based Conversational Services to IPv6: Complications and Interworking with IPv4”, 2nd ICDT, USA, July, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Camarillo and M. A. Garcia-Martin, “The 3G IP Multimedia Subsystem- merging the Internet and the cellular worlds”, John Wiley, 2005Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, K. H. et al., “COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning”, RFC 3084, March 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deering S., Hinden R., “Internet Protocol, Version 6 Specification”, RFC 2460, December 1998Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deering, S., “Host Extensions for IP Multicasting”, RFC 1112, August 1989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Hautakorpi et al., “Requirements from SIP Session Border Control Deployments”, draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs, March 2008Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hilt, V. et al.,“Sessions Initiation Protocol (SIP) Overload Control”, work in progress, March 2007Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “Voice-Over-Internet phoning doesn’t ’make sense’ in market”, International Herald Tribune, 11 February 2008Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacquenet, C., Boucadair, M., Bourdon, G., “Service Automation and Dynamic Provisioning Techniques in IP/MPLS Environments”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, March 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yensy, J.H. et al., “Joost: A Measurement Study”, May 2007, available at http://www.patrickpiemonte.com/15744-Joost.pdf
  13. 13.
    Maccarthaigh, C., “Joost Network Architecture”, RIPE, April 2007Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malas, D., Terpstra, R., “The Session Initiation Protocol CONGESTION Header Field”, work in progress, May 2006Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melcher, B, Mitchell, B. “Towards an Autonomic Framework: Self-Configuring Network Services and Developing Autonomic Applications”, Intel Technology Journal, 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenberg, J., “Requirements for Management of Overload in the Session Initiation Protocol”, work in progress, November 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenberg, J. et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, RFC 3261, June 2002Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenberg, J., Squire, M., and H. Salama, “Telephony Routing over IP”, RFC 3219, August 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Sengupta and R. Ramamurthy, “From Network Design to Dynamic Provisioning and Restoration in Optical Cross-Connect Mesh Networks: An Architectural and Algorithmic Overview”. IEEE Network Magazine, Vol. 15, No. 4, July/August 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    TISPAN, “Telecommunications and Internet converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking, NGN Release 1”, TR180001, 2006Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Postel, J., “Internet Protocol”, RFC 791, September 1981Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jun, L. et al., “An Experimental Analysis of Joost Peer-to-Peer VoD Service”, October 2007, available at http://www.net.informatik.uni-goettingen.de/publications/1484/Joost_experiment.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.France Télécom R&D14066 Caen CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations