Dynamic and Fair Spectrum Access for Autonomous Communications



Most of existing wireless systems are regulated by a fixed spectrum assignment strategy. This policy leads to an undesirable situation that some systems may only use the allocated spectrum to a limited extent while others have very serious spectrum insufficiency situation. Dynamic spectrum access (DSA) is emerging as a promising technology to address the above issue such that the unused licensed spectrum can be opportunistically accessed by the unlicensed users. To enable DSA, the unlicensed user shall have the capability of detecting the unoccupied spectrum, controlling its spectrum access in an adaptive manner, and coexisting with other unlicensed users automatically. In this chapter, we will give an overview on the DSA for sharing open spectrum. And we investigate a radio system transmission opportunity (TXOP)-based spectrum access control protocol, with the aim of improving spectrum access fairness and ensure safe coexistence of multiple unlicensed radio systems. Simulation is carried out to evaluate the TXOP-based scheme with respect to spectrum utilization, fairness, and scalability.


Radio System Channel Access Spectrum Sharing Autonomous Communication Spectrum Utilization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The work reported in this chapter has been partially funded by the OSIRIS project within the 3C Research programme on convergent technology for digital media processing and communications, and by the European Union through the Welsh Assembly Government.


  1. 1.
    XG Working Group. (Jul. 2003) The XG Vision. Request for Comments, BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA. [Online]. Available: http://www.darpa.mil/ato/programs/XG/rfcs.htm
  2. 2.
    Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, S. Mangold, S. Shankar, “Dynamic spectrum access in open spectrum wireless networks,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 24, No. 3, March 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Sankaranarayanan, P. Papadimitratos, A. Mishra, “Bandwidth sharing approach to improve licensed spectrum utilization,” Proc. of IEEE DYSPAN2005, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Mitola, “The software radio architecture,” IEEE Commun. Mag., Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 26–38, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Haykin, “Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 201–220, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. P. Satapathy, J. M. Peha, “Spectrum sharing without licenses: Opportunities and dangers,” Proc. Telecommun. Policy Res. Conf., pp. 15–29, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. F. Akyildiz, W.-Y. Lee, M. C. Vuran, S. Mohanty, “Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey,” Comput. Netw., Vol. 50, No. 13, pp. 2127–2159, 2006.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Q. Zhao, A. Swami, “A survey of dynamic spectrum access: Signal processing and networking perspectives,” ICASSP 2007, Vol. 4, 15–20 April 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, C. Cordeiro, “Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 613–621, April 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. E. Leu, M. McHenry, B. L. Mark, “Modeling and analysis of interference in listen-before-talk spectrum access schemes,” Int. J. Netw. Manag., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 131–147, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Sharma, A. Sahoo, K. D. Nayak, “Channel selection under interference temperature model in multi-hop cognitive mesh networks,” DySPAN 2007, pp. 133–136, 17–20 April 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Bater, H.-P. Tan, K. N. Brown, L. Doyle, “Modelling interference temperature constraints for spectrum access in cognitive radio networks,” ICC ’07, pp. 6493–6498, 24–28 June 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. F. Digham, M.-S. Alouini, M. K. Simon, “On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 21–24, Jan. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Sutton, K. Nolan, L. Doyle, “Cyclostationary signatures in practical cognitive radio applications,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 13–24, Jan. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Youn, H. Jeon, H. Jung, H. Lee, “Discrete wavelet packet transform based energy detector for cognitive radios,” VTC2007-Spring, pp. 2641–2645, 22–25 April 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Ghasemi, E. Sousa, “Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments,” DySPAN 2005, pp. 131–136, 8–11 Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Gandetto, C. Regazzoni, “Spectrum sensing: A distributed approach for cognitive terminals,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 546–557, April 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. A. K. Acharya, S. Singh, H. Zheng, “Reliable open spectrum communications through proactive spectrum access,” in TAPAS ’06: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Technology and Policy for Accessing Spectrum. New York, USA, ACM, 2006, p. 5.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Q. Zhao, L. Tong, A. Swami, Y. Chen, “Decentralized cognitive mac for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: A pomdp framework,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 589–600, April 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Geirhofer, L. Tong, B. Sadler, “Cognitive radios for dynamic spectrum access – dynamic spectrum access in the time domain: Modeling and exploiting white space,” IEEE Commun. Mag., Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 66–72, May 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Chowdhury, I. Akyildiz, “Cognitive wireless mesh networks with dynamic spectrum access,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 168–181, Jan. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Q. Zhao, S. Geirhofer, L. Tong, B. Sadler, “Opportunistic spectrum access via periodic channel sensing,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 785–796, Feb. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Brik, E. Rozner, S. Banerjee, P. Bahl, “Dsap: A protocol for coordinated spectrum access,” DySPAN 2005, pp. 611–614, 8–11 Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Cao, H. Zheng, “Distributed rule-regulated spectrum sharing,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 130–145, Jan. 2008.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    X. Jing, D. Raychaudhuri, “Spectrum co-existence of ieee 802.11b and 802.16a networks using reactive and proactive etiquette policies,” Mob. Netw. Appl., Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 539–554, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Etkin, A. Parekh, D. Tse, “Spectrum sharing for unlicensed bands,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 517–528, April 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Harada, R. Prasad, “Simulation and software radio for mobile communications,” Artech House Universal Personal Communications Series, 2002Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Jain, D. Chiu, W. Hawe, “A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems,” http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NI/9809099, 1998.
  29. 29.
    IEEE Std 802.11e-2005, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications Amendment 8: Medium Access Control (MAC) Quality of Service Enhancements, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Advanced Telecommunications, Swansea UniversitySwansea SA2 8PPUK
  2. 2.Simula Research LaboratoryNo-1325 LysakerNorway
  3. 3.Department of Electronic and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgow G1 1XWUK

Personalised recommendations