Dynamic and Fair Spectrum Access for Autonomous Communications
Most of existing wireless systems are regulated by a fixed spectrum assignment strategy. This policy leads to an undesirable situation that some systems may only use the allocated spectrum to a limited extent while others have very serious spectrum insufficiency situation. Dynamic spectrum access (DSA) is emerging as a promising technology to address the above issue such that the unused licensed spectrum can be opportunistically accessed by the unlicensed users. To enable DSA, the unlicensed user shall have the capability of detecting the unoccupied spectrum, controlling its spectrum access in an adaptive manner, and coexisting with other unlicensed users automatically. In this chapter, we will give an overview on the DSA for sharing open spectrum. And we investigate a radio system transmission opportunity (TXOP)-based spectrum access control protocol, with the aim of improving spectrum access fairness and ensure safe coexistence of multiple unlicensed radio systems. Simulation is carried out to evaluate the TXOP-based scheme with respect to spectrum utilization, fairness, and scalability.
KeywordsRadio System Channel Access Spectrum Sharing Autonomous Communication Spectrum Utilization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The work reported in this chapter has been partially funded by the OSIRIS project within the 3C Research programme on convergent technology for digital media processing and communications, and by the European Union through the Welsh Assembly Government.
- 1.XG Working Group. (Jul. 2003) The XG Vision. Request for Comments, BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA. [Online]. Available: http://www.darpa.mil/ato/programs/XG/rfcs.htm
- 2.Y. Xing, R. Chandramouli, S. Mangold, S. Shankar, “Dynamic spectrum access in open spectrum wireless networks,” IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 24, No. 3, March 2006.Google Scholar
- 3.S. Sankaranarayanan, P. Papadimitratos, A. Mishra, “Bandwidth sharing approach to improve licensed spectrum utilization,” Proc. of IEEE DYSPAN2005, 2005.Google Scholar
- 6.D. P. Satapathy, J. M. Peha, “Spectrum sharing without licenses: Opportunities and dangers,” Proc. Telecommun. Policy Res. Conf., pp. 15–29, 1996.Google Scholar
- 8.Q. Zhao, A. Swami, “A survey of dynamic spectrum access: Signal processing and networking perspectives,” ICASSP 2007, Vol. 4, 15–20 April 2007.Google Scholar
- 11.M. Sharma, A. Sahoo, K. D. Nayak, “Channel selection under interference temperature model in multi-hop cognitive mesh networks,” DySPAN 2007, pp. 133–136, 17–20 April 2007.Google Scholar
- 12.J. Bater, H.-P. Tan, K. N. Brown, L. Doyle, “Modelling interference temperature constraints for spectrum access in cognitive radio networks,” ICC ’07, pp. 6493–6498, 24–28 June 2007.Google Scholar
- 15.Y. Youn, H. Jeon, H. Jung, H. Lee, “Discrete wavelet packet transform based energy detector for cognitive radios,” VTC2007-Spring, pp. 2641–2645, 22–25 April 2007.Google Scholar
- 16.A. Ghasemi, E. Sousa, “Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments,” DySPAN 2005, pp. 131–136, 8–11 Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
- 18.P. A. K. Acharya, S. Singh, H. Zheng, “Reliable open spectrum communications through proactive spectrum access,” in TAPAS ’06: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Technology and Policy for Accessing Spectrum. New York, USA, ACM, 2006, p. 5.Google Scholar
- 23.V. Brik, E. Rozner, S. Banerjee, P. Bahl, “Dsap: A protocol for coordinated spectrum access,” DySPAN 2005, pp. 611–614, 8–11 Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
- 27.H. Harada, R. Prasad, “Simulation and software radio for mobile communications,” Artech House Universal Personal Communications Series, 2002Google Scholar
- 28.R. Jain, D. Chiu, W. Hawe, “A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems,” http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.NI/9809099, 1998.
- 29.IEEE Std 802.11e-2005, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications Amendment 8: Medium Access Control (MAC) Quality of Service Enhancements, 2005.Google Scholar