• Marilena Onete
  • Mihaela Paucă-Comănescu


The green spaces in Bucharest have different ages and degrees of structural complexity (vegetational and architectural). They can be considered to be artificial ecosystems because they are created for aesthetic reasons by the planting of ornamental trees, shrubs and herbaceous species. The native vegetation has almost disappeared from the city having been replaced by the artificial ecosystems described. Some species that are planted in these artificial systems are species of the natural former forests of Romania. The city contains remnants of natural vegetation, which has adapted to the modified conditions of the urban environment. However, the authorities are ignoring the necessity of maintaining and increasing the green spaces of the city. Even Natural Law 749/2006 which regulates the administration of green spaces in the city is being systematically ignored by the authorities. The structural habitat diversity and the limited botanical surveys of vascular and non-vascular plants and lichenised fungi indicate that the city contains an extensive and interesting flora. However, the vegetation and the flora of the city need to be studied much more comprehensively, not least to ensure that the planning, design and management of the city as a whole and the green spaces in particular are based on sound scientific information.


Green Space Cynodon Dactylon Ceratophyllum Demersum Taraxacum Officinale Lotus Corniculatus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Anastasiu P (1994) Naturalized plants in Bucharest city. Acta Bot. Hort. Buc., 135–137Google Scholar
  2. Ciocârlan V (2000) Ilustrated flora of Romania. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. Editura Ceres, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  3. Culescu M (2008) Bucharest industrial wasteland – between ecology and development, 3 rd Conference of the Competence Network Urban Ecology “Urban Biodiversity and Design – Implementing the Convention of Biological diversity in towns and cities”, Book of abstracts, pag. 56Google Scholar
  4. Culescu M, Tudora I (2007) Post-industrial Bucharest and re-deffinition of a new urban landscape, ACUM 2 (Art, Urban Comunity, Mobilization) – Public space and social re-insertion of a artistic and architectural project. Editura Universitara “ION MINCU”, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  5. Doniţă N, Popescu A, Paucă-Comănescu M, Mihăilescu S, Biriş IA (2005) The habitats from Romania. Editura Tehnică, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  6. Gheorghe R, Nica M (2008) The capital city of Romania. In: Onete M, Ion M (ed) Planning environmental management. Methodology for assisting municipality, Editura Ars Docendi, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  7. Gomoiu I, Ştefănuţ S (2008), Lichen and mosses as bioindicator of air pollution in Bucharest. In: Onete M (ed) Species monitoring in the Central Parks of Bucharest. Editura Ars Docendi, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  8. Lăcătuşu R, Anastasiu N, Popescu M, Enciu P (2008) The geo-atlas of Bucharest City (Geo-atlasul municipiului Bucharest). Editura Estfalia, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  9. Mogîldea DE (2008), Macrofungi in urban ecosystem. In: Onete M (ed) Species monitoring in the Central Parks of Bucharest. Editura Ars Docendi, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  10. Morariu I (1943) Antropophile plant associations from Bucharest surrounding with observations on their distribution in the country and especially in Transilvania. Bul. Grad. Bot. Cluj. XXII (3–4):131–224Google Scholar
  11. Nedelcu GA, Popescu A, Sanda V (1972a) Coenological researches upon the helophyts from Bucharest surroundings. St. Cerc. Biol. Seria Botanica, 24(1):3–8Google Scholar
  12. Nedelcu GA, Popescu A, Sanda V (1972b) Researches upon the sociology of macrophytes from Bucharest surroundings. Hidrobiologia, 13:189–198Google Scholar
  13. Oltean M, Negrean G, Popescu A, Roman N, Dihoru G, Sanda V, Mihăilescu S (1994) The red list of higher plants from Romania. Studii, Sinteze, Documentaţii de Ecologie. Institutul de Biologie. Academia Română, I:5–52Google Scholar
  14. Onete M, Paucǎ-Comǎnescu M (2008a) Synanthropic flora from Bucharest central parks, Romanian Ecological Society Conference. Book of abstracts. Editura Ars Docendi, 179–181.Google Scholar
  15. Onete M, Paucă-Comănescu M (2008b) Heavy metal content assessment in plants from Bucharest. In: Onete M (ed) Species monitoring in the Central Parks of Bucharest. Editura Ars Docendi, BucharestGoogle Scholar
  16. Popescu A. Sanda V, Ionescu Al (1971) Researches upon herbaceous vegetation from Bucharest surroundings. St. Cerc. Biol. Seria Botanica, 23(1):47–55Google Scholar
  17. Prodan I (1922) An overview upon arborescente flora from Bucharest. Revista padurilor, 397–404Google Scholar
  18. Sanda V, Popescu A (1971) Phytocoenological researches in the forests from Bucharest surroundings. St. Cerc. Biol. Seria Botanica, 23(2):125–142Google Scholar
  19. Spiridon L (1973) The ruderal vegetation from Bcuharest city surroundings. Analele Univ Bucharest. Biol Veget, XXII: 129–132Google Scholar
  20. Ştefănuţ S (2008) The Hornwort and Liverwort Atlas of Romania. Edit. Ars Docendi. BucharestGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecology, Taxonomy and Nature Conservation CentreInstitute of Biology, Romanian AcademyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations