East Asian Island and Maritime Disputes in a World of Globalization

Part of the The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific book series (PEAP)


East Asia is home to many of the world’s most vexing territorial disputes.1 The territories in dispute need not cover the entire soil of a particular state, as in the cases of the two Chinas and the two Koreas, in order to seriously strain interstate relationships. Even small, barely habitable islands and rocks in semi-enclosed waters like the East Sea/Sea of Japan, the East and the South China Sea can be the most persistent and explosive bone of contention. The danger of conflict escalation looms particularly large during a global shortage of energy and marine resources. All the energy-hungry littoral states in the region eye the high potential of oil and gas deposits in the vicinity of the disputed islands. They also rely on contested offshore areas to provide a large portion of their marine diets. Yet material concerns are hardly the sole drivers of the island disputes in East Asia. Many of the disputed areas raise questions of national identity and pride, thereby feeding territorial nationalism following the end of ideology in contemporary East Asia.


East Asian Country Territorial Dispute Economic Interdependence Initial Impetus Territorial Claim 


  1. Adler E, Barnett M (1998) Security communities in theoretical perspective. In: Adler E, Barnett M (eds) Security communities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler E, Haas PM (1992) Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization 46(1):367–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aggarwal VK (1998) Reconciling multiple institutions: Bargaining, linkages, and nesting. In: Aggarwal VK (ed) Institutional designs for a complex world: Bargaining, linkages, and nesting. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad H (ed) (1997) The Straits of Malacca: International cooperation in trade, funding, and navigational safety. Pelanduk Publications, Selangor Darul EhsanGoogle Scholar
  5. Archibugi D, Held D (eds) (1995) Cosmopolitan democracy: An agenda for a new world order. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin G (1998) China’s ocean frontier: International law, military force and national development. Allen and Unwin, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Bercovitch J, Jackson R (1997) International conflict: A chronological encyclopedia of conflicts and their management 1945–1995. Congressional Quarterly Books, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard JM (2000) The U.S. role in the Sino–Japanese dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) island, 1945–1971. China Quarterly 161:95–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bong YD (2002) Flashpoints at sea? Legitimization strategy and East Asian island disputes. PhD Dissertation in Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Brecher M (1993) Crises in world politics: Theory and reality. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Brecher M, Wilkenfeld J (1997) A study of crisis. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzan B (1978) A sea of trouble? Sources of dispute in the new ocean regime. Adelphi Paper 143, International Institute for Strategic Studies, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Calder KE (1996) Pacific defense: Arms, energy, and America’s future in Asia. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Calder KE (1997) Asia’s deadly triangle: How arms, energy and growth threaten to destabilize Asia-Pacific. Nicholas Brealy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Calder KE (2004) Securing security through prosperity: The San Francisco system in comparative perspective. The Pacific Review 17(1):135–157Google Scholar
  16. Catley R, Keliat M (1997) Spratlys: The dispute in the South China Sea, Ashgate, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  17. Charney JI (1995) Central East Asian maritime boundaries and the law of the sea. The American Journal of International Law 89:724–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng T (1974) The Sino–Japanese dispute over the Tiao-yu-tai (Senkaku) islands and the law of territorial acquisition. Virginia Journal of International Law 14(2):221–266Google Scholar
  19. Christensen TJ (2006) Fostering stability or creating a monster? The rise of China and U.S. policy toward East Asia. International Security 31(1):81–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chung C (2004) Domestic politics, international bargaining and China’s territorial disputes. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deans P (2000) Contending nationalisms and the Diaoyutai/Senkaku dispute. Security Dialogue 31(1):119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deutsch KW (1953) Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry into the foundations of nationality. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Deutsch KW (1957) Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Deutsch KW (1968) The analysis of international relations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  25. Diehl PF (ed) (1999) A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville and LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Djalal H, Townsend-Gault I (1999) Managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea: Informal diplomacy for conflict prevention? In: Crocker CA, Hampson FO, Aall PR (eds) Herding cats: Multiparty mediation in a complex world. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Donaldson J, Williams A (2005) Understanding maritime jurisdictional disputes: The East China Sea and beyond. Journal of International Affairs 59(1):135–156Google Scholar
  28. Downs ES, Saunders PC (1998/1999) Legitimacy and the limits of nationalism: China and the Diaoyu islands. International Security 23(3):114–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Franceschet A (2002) Kant and liberal internationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Fravel MT (2003) The long march to peace: Explaining China’s settlement of territorial disputes. PhD Dissertation in Political Science, Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Fravel MT (2005) Regime insecurity and international cooperation: explaining China’s compromises in territorial disputes. International Security 30(2):46–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Friedberg A (2005) The future of U.S.–China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security 30(2):7–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gochman CS, Maoz Z (1984) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28(4):585–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goertz G, Diehl PF (1992) Territorial changes and international conflict. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldstein A (2005) Rising to the challenge: China’s grand strategy and international security. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Haas EB (1958) The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Haas EB (1964) Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Haas EB (1990) When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  39. Haas PM (1992) Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1):1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hagström L (2005) Quiet power: Japan’s China policy in regard to the Pinnacle islands. The Pacific Review 18(2):159–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haller-Trost R (1990) The Spratly islands: A study on the limitations of international law. Occasional Paper 14. Canterbury: Centre of South-East Asian Studies of University of Kent at CanterburyGoogle Scholar
  42. Hara K (2001) 50 Years from San Francisco: Re-examining the peace treaty and Japan’s territorial problems. Pacific Affairs 74(3):361–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris S, Mack A (eds) (1997) Asia-Pacific security: The economics-politics nexus. Allen & Unwin Australia, St. LeonardsGoogle Scholar
  44. Held D (1995) Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Hensel PR (1996) Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1816–1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:43–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hensel PR (1998) Interstate rivalry and the study of militarized conflict. In: Harvey F, Mor B (eds) New directions in the study of international conflict, crises, and war. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Holsti KJ (1991) Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order, 1649–1989. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Huth PK (1996) Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  49. Huth PK, Allee TL (2002) The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the 20th century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Johnston AI (1998) China’s militarized interstate dispute behavior, 1949–1992: A first cut at the data. China Quarterly 153:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Katzenstein PJ (1996) Introduction: Alternative perspectives on national security. In: Katzenstein PJ (ed) The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Kenny HJ (2004) China and the competition for oil and gas in Asia. Asia Pacific Review 11(2):36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kim D (2000) Naval strategy in Northeast Asia: Geo-strategic goals, policies, and prospects. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim SP (2004) Maritime delimitation and interim arrangements in Northeast Asia. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim Y (1999) Korea and international maritime laws, Hyosung Publisher (in Korean), Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  56. Kocs S (1995) Territorial disputes and interstate war, 1945–1987. Journal of Politics 57(1):159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kolodziej E, Kanet R (eds) (1996) Coping with conflict after the cold war. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  58. Kratochwil F, Rohrilich P, Mahajan H (1985) Peace and disputed sovereignty: Reflections on conflict over territory. University Press of America, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  59. Lee CM (2004) Rethinking future paths on the Korean peninsula. The Pacific Review 17(2):249–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lind JM (2004) Democratization and stability in East Asia. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  61. Linklater A (1982) Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Linklater A (1990) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical theory and international relations. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Matsui Y (1997) International law of territorial acquisition and the dispute over the Senkaku (Diaoyu) islands. Japanese Journal of International Law 40:3–31Google Scholar
  64. Mearsheimer J (2001) The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Meconis C, Wallace M (2000) East Asian naval weapons acquisitions in the 1990s: Causes, consequences, and responses. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  66. Mitrany D (1976) The functional theory of politics. St. Martins Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Mochizuki MM (1998) Security and economic interdependence in Northeast Asia. Asia/Pacific Research Center Working Paper, Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  68. Moon C, Chun C (2003) Sovereignty: Dominance of the Westphalian concept and implications for regional security. In: Alagappa M (ed) Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Mueller J (1989) Retreat from doomsday: The obsolescence of major war. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. O’Brien, R (1977) South China Sea oil: Two problems of ownership and development. Occasional Paper, 47, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  71. Park C (1973) Oil under troubled waters: The Northeast Asia sea-bed controversy. Harvard International Law Journal 14(2):212–260Google Scholar
  72. Risse-Kappen T (1995) Bringing transnational relations back in: Introduction. In: Risse-Kappen T (ed) Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenau JN (1997) Along the domestic-foreign frontier: Exploring governance in a turbulent world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roy D (1994) Hegemon on the horizon? China’s threat to East Asian security. International Security 19(1):149–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schelling TC (1980) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Senese PD (1996) Geographical proximity and issue salience: Their effect on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15:133–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Senese PD, Vasquez JA (2003) A unified explanation of territorial conflict: Testing the impact of sampling bias, 1919–1992. International Studies Quarterly 47(2):275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shirk SL, Twomey CP (eds) (1996) Power and prosperity: Economics and security linkages in Asia-Pacific. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  79. Simmons BA (2003) Trade and territorial conflict: International borders as institutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  80. Snyder G, Diesing PA (1977) Conflict among nations: Bargaining, decision making, and system structure in international crises. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  81. Solingen E (1998) Regional orders at century’s dawn: Global and domestic influences on grand strategy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  82. Stein A (1993) Governments, economic interdependence, and international cooperation. In: Tetlock P, Husbands J, Jervis R, Stern PC, Tilly C (eds) Behavior, society and international conflict. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Suganuma U (2000) Sovereign rights and territorial space in Sino-Japanese relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  84. Suzuki S (2007) The importance of ‘othering’ in China’s national identity: Sino-Japanese relations as a stage of identity conflicts. The Pacific Review 20(1):23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Valencia MJ (1995) China and the South China Sea disputes: Conflicting claims and potential solutions in the South China Sea. Adelphi Paper 298, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, LondonGoogle Scholar
  86. Valencia MJ (2000) Regional maritime regime building: Prospects in Northeast and Southeast Asia. Ocean Development and International Law 31(3):223–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Valencia MJ, Van Dyke JM, Ludwig NA (1997) Sharing the resources of the South China Sea. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  88. Vasquez JA (1993) The war puzzle. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vasquez JA (2001) Mapping the probability of war and analyzing the possibility of peace: The role of territorial disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science 18(2):145–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vasquez JA, Henehan MT (2001) Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research 38:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wan M (2003) Economic interdependence and economic cooperation: Mitigating conflict and transforming security order in Asia. In: Alagappa M (ed) Asian security order: Instrumental and normative features. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  92. Wendt A (1999) Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Personalised recommendations