Advertisement

Scarcity and Efficiency

  • Mikuláš Luptáčik
Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 36)

Abstract

Scarcity is a fundamental problem faced by all economies. Not enough resources are available to produce all of the goods and services to satisfy human wants. According to a frequently cited definition of economics by Robbins [41, p. 16]: “Economics is the science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.” In the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics,1 this definition of economics is still used to define the subject today. Although this definition is simplified and “it cannot be understood as a complete list of topics belonging to economics, the scarcity principle certainly plays some role in all economic studies” [40, p. 13; translated by the author]. Scarce commodities are those which are both desired and not freely available. The scarcity of resources cannot be eliminated; rather, choices must be made about how resources will be used.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis Capital Stock Portfolio Selection Fractional Programming Mathematical Programming Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Reading

  1. [1]
    K. J. Arrow, George Dantzig in the development of economic analysis, Discrete Optim., 5 (2008), 159–167.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. L. Balintfy, Applications of mathematical programming to optimize human diets, Sympos. Math., XIX (1976), 313–339.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. J. Beckmann, Comparative statics in linear programming and the Giffen paradox, Rev. Econ. Stud., 23 (1956), 232–235.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Cassel, Theory of Social Economy, rev. ed., Harcourt–Brace, NewYork, 1932; originally published in German, 1918.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Charnes,W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, Measuring efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2 (1978), 429–444.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Charnes,W.W. Cooper, and L. M. Thrall, Classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Oper. Res. Lett., 5 -3 (1986), 105–110MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Chenery and B. Raduchel, Substitution in planning models, in H. B. Chenery, ed., Studies in Development Planning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. B. Dantzig, Programming in a Linear Structure, Office of the Comptroller, United States Air Force,Washington, DC, 1948.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. B. Dantzig, Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities, in T. C. Koopmans, ed., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission Monographs vol. 13,Wiley, NewYork, 1951, 330–347.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. B. Dantzig, Reminiscences about the origins of linear programming, in A. Bachem, M. Grötschel, and B. Korte, eds., Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art: Bonn 1982, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983, 78–86.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Dietzenbacher and M. L. Lahr, eds., Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Dorfman, P. A. Samuelson, and R. M. Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis, McGraw–Hill, New York, 1958.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Dorfman,Wassily Leontief’s contribution to economics, Swedish J. Econ., 75 (1973), 430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    E. J. Elton and M. J. Gruber, Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. J. Farrel, The measurement of technical efficiency, J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser.A, 120 -3 (1957), 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. K. Foley,An InterviewwithWassily Leontief, Macroecon. Dynam., 2 (1998), 116–140.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Gale, The Theory of Linear Economic Models, McGraw–Hill, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    L. Johansen, A Multisectoral Study of Economic Growth, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1960.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    F. John, Extremum problems with inequalities as side conditions, in K. O. Fridrichs, O. E. Neugebauer, and J. J. Stoker, eds., Studies and Essays: Courant Anniversary Volume,Wiley, NewYork, 1948.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. V. Kantorovic, Matematischeskije Metody Organizatsii i Planirovania Proizvodstva, Leningrad State University Publishers, Leningrad, USSR, 1939 (in Russian); Mathematical methods in the organization and planning of production, Manage. Sci., 6 -4 (1960), 366–422.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    W. Karush, Minima of Functions of SeveralVariables with Inequalities as Side Conditions, M. S. thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1939.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    T. C.Koopmans, ed., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission Monographs vol. 13,Wiley, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. C. Koopmans, Concepts of optimality and their uses, Nobel Memorial Lecture, in A. Lindbeck, ed., Nobel Lectures in Economic Sciences 1969–1980, World Scientific, Singapore, 1992, 239–256.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    H.W.Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, Nonlinear programming, in J. Neyman, ed., Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1951, 481–492.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    H. D. Kurz, E. Dietzenbacher, and C. Lager, eds., Input–Output Analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. L. Lahr and E. Dietzenbacher, eds., Input–Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions, Palgrave–Macmillan, NewYork, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    W. W. Leontief, Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States, Rev. Econ. Statist., 18 (1936), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    W. W. Leontief, The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1941.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    W. W. Leontief, The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1939: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    W.W. Leontief, Mathematics in economics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 60 (1954), 215–233.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    A. Lindbeck, ed., Nobel Lectures in Economic Sciences 1969–1980, World Scientific, Singapore, 1992.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    M. Luptáčik, Geometrische Programmierung und ökonomische Analyse, Mathematical Systems in Economics vol. 32, Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan, Germany, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    H. M. Markowitz, Portfolio selection, J. Finance, 7 (1952), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    H. M. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Cowles Foundation Monographs vol. 16,Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1959.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    R. E. Miller and P. D. Blair, Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    W. Nicholson, Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions, 5th ed., Dryden Press/Harcourt–Brace–Jovanovich, NewYork, 1992.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    A. Pigou, ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall, Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, London, 1925.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Th. ten Raa, Linear Analysis of Competitive Economics, LSE Handbooks in Economics, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1995.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Th. ten Raa, The Economics of Input–Output Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    R. Richter, U. Schlieper, and W. Friedmann, Makroökonomik, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    L. Robbins, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed., MacMillan, London, 1935.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    D. Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, reprint of the 3rd ed., Bell and Sons, London, 1924 (1st ed., 1817).Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    G. J. Stigler, The cost of substance, J. Farm Econ., 27 (1945), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    P. Schreiner, The role of input–output in the perspective analysis of the Norwegian economy, in A. Brody and A. P. Carter, eds., Input–Output Techniques: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Input–Output Techniques, Geneva, January 1971, North- Holland, Amsterdam, London, 1972.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    J. Schumann, Input–Output Analyse, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1968.MATHGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    S. Schaible, A survey of fractional programming, in S. Schaible and N. T. Ziemba, eds., Generalized Concavity in Optimization and Economics, Academic Press, New York, 1981, 417–440.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    L. Walras, Elements d’economie politique pure, W. Jaffe, transl., George Allen/Unwin, London, 1954 (orignally published in French, 1874).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsVienna University of Economics and Business AdministrationViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations