Advertisement

Practical Application of Hilbert Transform Techniques in Identifying Inter-area Oscillations

  • T. J. Browne
  • V. Vittal
  • G.T. Heydt
  • Arturo Roman Messina
Chapter
Part of the Power Electronics and Power Systems book series (PEPS)

Abstract

Disturbances in large power systems can exhibit nonlinear, time-varying behavior. Traditional modal identification from field data is via techniques, such as Prony analysis, which assume data stationarity. The Hilbert transform and analytic function can be used to analyze inter-area oscillatory behavior of power systems with the stationarity assumption relaxed. However, reducing the data to simple numerical results can be achieved more effectively when stationarity is assumed. The application process is not straightforward and subtle changes can yield considerable variation in the results observed. An example is the effect of discrete time calculations of the Hilbert transform over a window of finite length. Application of the newer modal identification technique, Hilbert analysis, is examined relative to the more established Prony analysis, with particular reference to the considerable structural differences which exist between the two methods. Prony analysis yields modes which are directly expressed as exponentially modulated sinusoids, whereas the Hilbert method provides a more general solution. Synthetic and measured signals are used in the comparison. Some general conclusions are drawn from the analysis of several signals, including sets of measured field data.

Keywords

Fast Fourier Transform Discrete Fourier Transform Modal Parameter Empirical Mode Decomposition Instantaneous Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Kamwa, R. Grondin, Y. Hebert, “Wide-area measurement based stabilizing control of large power systems – a decentralized/hierarchical approach,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 136–153, Feb. 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Kamwa, L. Gerin-Lajoie, G. Trudel, “Multi-loop power system stabilizers using wide-area synchronous phasor measurements,” Proc. American Control Conference, vol. 5, pp. 2963–2967, June 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. F. Hauer, “Application of Prony analysis to the determination of modal content and equivalent models for measured power system response,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1062–1068, Aug. 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. J. Browne, V. Vittal, G. T. Heydt, A. R. Messina, “A comparative assessment of two techniques for modal identification from power system measurements,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1408–1415, Aug. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. E. Huang, Z. She, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, S. S. Shih, Q. Zheng, N.-C. Yen, C. C. Tung, H. H. Liu, “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,” Proc. Royal Society of London, vol. 454, pp. 903–995, 1998.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Rogers, Power System Oscillations. Boston: Kluwer, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Hauer, D. Trudnowski, G. Rogers, B. Mittelstadt, W. Litzenberger, J. Johnson, “Keeping an eye on power system dynamics,” IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 50–54, Oct. 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. E. Grund, J. J. Paserba, J. F. Hauer, S. Nilsson, “Comparison of Prony and eigenanalysis for power system control design,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 964–971, Aug. 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    BPA/PNNL, Dynamic Systems Identification (DSI) Toolbox, [Online], available: ftp://ftp.bpa.gov/pub/WAMS_Information/.
  10. 10.
    D. Sundararajan, The Discrete Fourier Transform: Theory, Algorithms and Applications . New York: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2001.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Chu, Discrete and Continuous Fourier Transforms: Analysis, Applications, and Fast Algorithms, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Publishing Co., 2008.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. D. McGillem, G. R. Cooper, Continuous and Discrete Signal and System Analysis, New York: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. R. Cooper, C. D. McGillem, Methods of Signal and System Analysis, New York: Prentice Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky, S. Hamid, Signals and Systems, New York: Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. O’Shea, “The use of sliding spectral windows for parameters estimation in power system disturbance monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1261–1267, Nov. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. P. Poon, K. C. Lee, “Analysis of transient stability swings in large interconnected power systems by Fourier transformation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1573–1581, Nov. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. L. Hahn, Hilbert Transforms in Signal Processing. Boston: Artech House, 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. N. Bracewell, The Fourier transform and its applications. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Bedrosian, “A product theorem for Hilbert transforms,” Proc. IEEE, pp. 868–869, May 1963.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. D. Cain, “Hilbert transform relations for products,” Proc. IEEE, pp. 673–674, May 1973.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. W. Brown, R. V. Churchill, Complex Variables and Applications. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Rilling, P. Flandrin, P. Gonçalès, “On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms,” IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing (NSIP-03), Grado (Italy), Jun. 8–11, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Cohen, Time-Frequency Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control. Palo Alto: EPRI, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Boashash, “Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal – Part 1: Fundamentals,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 520–538, Apr. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Ceravolo, “Use of instantaneous estimators for the evaluation of structural damping,” J. Sound and Vibration, vol. 274, no. 1–2, pp. 385–401, Jul. 6, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Flandrin, Empirical Mode Decomposition, [Online] available: http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/patrick.flandrin/emd.html, Mar. 2007.
  29. 29.
    N. Senroy, S. Suryanarayanan, P. F. Ribeiro, “An improved Hilbert-Huang method for analysis of time-varying waveforms in power quality,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1843–1850, Nov. 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. J. Sanchez-Gasca, V. Vittal, M. J. Gibbard, A. R. Messina, D. J. Vowles, S. Liu, U. D. Annakkage, “Inclusion of higher order terms for small-signal (modal) analysis: Committee report – Task force on assessing the need to include higher order terms for small-signal (modal) analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1886–1901, Nov. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. R. Messina, V. Vittal, D. Ruiz-Vega, G. Enríquez-Harper, “Interpretation and visualization of wide-area PMU measurements using Hilbert analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1763–1771, Nov. 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media,LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Browne
    • 1
  • V. Vittal
  • G.T. Heydt
  • Arturo Roman Messina
  1. 1.Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Department of Electrical EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations