Advertisement

Teaching for Intellectual and Emotional Learning (TIEL): Bringing Thinking and Moral-Ethical Learning into Classrooms

  • Christy Folsom
Chapter

Abstract

Teaching in ways that promote the moral development of students is a daunting task for teachers in gifted programs and in general education classrooms. While time and curriculum requirements are often a factor, teacher preparation programs do not adequately prepare teachers to address the moral-ethical aspects of learning. Additionally, the voluminous terminology that refers to moral development can be confusing. Often overlooked is the relationship between the intellect and the moral aspect of learning for gifted students. When intellectual needs are not addressed in school, moral development can suffer. The TIEL Curriculum Design Wheel brings these important intellectual and emotional components together forming a framework that guides teachers in developing curriculum that includes the teaching of thinking processes as well as social emotional learning.

Helping students develop morally and ethically is a daunting task for teachers. In general education classrooms, where most gifted students spend the majority of their time, mandated curriculum, pacing charts, and standardized testing have priority and consume the majority of classroom time. In gifted programs, where teachers have limited time with their students and the focus is more often on creativity, thinking skills, and problem-solving, not necessarily related to academic content (Borland 1997), the moral-ethical aspects of learning are often neglected.

In addition, teaching for moral-ethical learning can be a confusing enterprise. Little in teacher education prepares teachers with the knowledge of the intellectual or emotional components necessary to consciously design curriculum and establish environments that help students develop moral-ethical principles. Teacher education programs provide even less information about advanced learners and how to accommodate their needs in the classroom.

The purpose of this chapter is to present Teaching for Intellectual and Emotional Learning (TIEL), a model that I developed to help teachers bring the moral-ethical aspect of education into programs for the gifted as well as general education classrooms. The TIEL Curriculum Design model (Folsom 1998) connects cognitive and affective components of learning and provides a valuable tool that helps teachers develop curriculum that includes the teaching of thinking and moral/ethical learning. Four questions will be addressed in the chapter. What terms address the concept of moral or morality? What does moral education mean in school? What is the experience of gifted students in school? How can the TIEL Curriculum Design model help teachers address the intellectual and emotional learning needs of gifted students, as well as improve learning opportunities for all students?

Keywords

Ethical Reasoning Moral Development Moral Education Divergent Thinking Gifted Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ambrose, D. (2003). Barriers to aspiration development and self-fulfillment: Interdisciplinary insights for talent discovery. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: D. McKay.Google Scholar
  3. Borland, J. H. (1997). The construct of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3–4), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cross, T. L. (2005). The social and emotional lives of gifted kids: Understanding and guiding their development. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1964). John Dewey on education: Selected writings (R. D. Archambault, Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  8. Doddington, C. (2008). Critical thinking as a source of respect for persons: A critique. In M. Mason (Ed.), Critical thinking and learning (pp. 109–119). Richmond, Victoria, Australia: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doll, W. E., Jr. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Durkheim, E. (1961). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. S. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  12. Folsom, C. (1998). From a distance: Joining the mind and moral character. Roeper Review, 20(4), 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Folsom, C. (2004). Complex teaching and learning: Connecting teacher education to student performance. In E. Guyton (Ed.), Association of teacher educators yearbook (Vol. XII, pp. 205–231). Reston, VA: ATE.Google Scholar
  14. Folsom, C. (2009). Teaching for intellectual and emotional learning (TIEL): A model for creating powerful curriculum. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  15. Frankena, W. K. (1970). The concept of morality. In G. Wallace & A. D. M. Walker (Eds.), The definition of morality (pp. 146–173). London: Camelot Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Robert R. Knapp.Google Scholar
  19. Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Empathy, social cognition, and moral action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1: Theory, pp. 275–301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Howley, C. B., Howley, A., & Pendarvis, E. D. (1995). Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jersild, A. T. (1955). When teachers face themselves. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohlberg, L. (1978). The cognitive developmental approach to moral education. In P. Scharf (Ed.), Readings in moral education (pp. 36–51). Minneapolis, MN: Winston Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kramer, D. A. (1990). Conceptualizing wisdom: The primacy of affect-cognition relations. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 279–313). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kwak, D. (2008). Re-conceptualizing critical thinking for moral education in culturally plural societies. In M. Mason (Ed.), Critical thinking and learning (pp. 120–130). Richmond, Victoria, Australia: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Labouvie-Vief, G. (1990). Wisdom as integrated thought: Historical and developmental perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 52–83). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowry, L. (1993). The giver. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
  31. Marzano, R. J. (1993). How classroom teachers approach the teaching of thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. Oxford, UK: Viking.Google Scholar
  33. McNamee, A. S., Zakin, A., Saravia-Shore, M., Ross, A. L., Peloso, J. M., Dubetz, N. E., Folsom, C., Mercurio, M., Morales-Flores, J., Fairbank, H., & Iurato, J. P. (2008). A renaissance of the arts in classrooms: A collaboration between a college, a public school and an arts institution. In C. J. Craig & L. F. Deretchin (Eds.), Imagining a renaissance in teacher education. Teacher education yearbook (Vol. 16, pp. 328–347). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  34. Meeker, M. (1979). A structure of intellect. El Segundo, CA: SOI Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Monroe, K. R. (1996). The heart of altruism: Perceptions of a common humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Morley, F. P. (1979). The essence of personalized teaching and learning.Educational Leadership, 36(8), 590–594.Google Scholar
  37. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Noddings, N. (2005). Caring in education. The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from www.infed.org/biblio/noddings_caring_in_education.htm.
  39. Paul, R. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar
  40. Sisk, D. (2008). Engaging the spiritual intelligence of gifted students to build global awareness in the classroom. Roeper Review, 30(1), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Wisdom as a form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 4(4), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1975). A backward and forward glance at the gifted. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted (pp. 21–31). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  44. Vare, J. W. (1979). Moral education for the gifted: A confluent model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22(3), 487–499.Google Scholar
  45. Weiner, L. (1998). Urban teaching: The essentials. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  46. Whiteley, C. H. (1970). On defining ‘moral.’ In G. Wallace & A. D. M. Walker (Eds.), The definition of morality (pp. 21–25). London: Camelot Press.Google Scholar
  47. Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood and Childhood EducationB-43 Carman Hall, Lehman College, City University of New YorkBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations