Skip to main content

The Transnationalization of Change in Economic Institutions: The Case of Industrial Standards Regulations in Ukraine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Transnationalization of Economies, States, and Civil Societies
  • 606 Accesses

This chapter examines the dynamics of change in economic institutions in an emerging market economy. Empirically, I conduct a case study of change in economic institutions regulating the application and monitoring of industrial standards in Ukraine. I seek to explain why economic institutions in this policy field change and why they change selectively, albeit gradually?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     As previously mentioned, the analysis will be limited to the Western influence.

  2. 2.

     As early as 2000, 5 years before the EU and the Ukrainian government agreed to prepare ACAA negotiations, Ukraine started to work on harmonizing the standards of those four sectors that the country selected for the ACAA.

  3. 3.

     These include (a) the Law of Standardization, (b) the Law on Assurance of Conformity Assessment, (c) the Law on Accreditation of Authorities of Conformity Assessment, and (d) the Law on Market Surveillance.

  4. 4.

     For a definition of gradual change and an overview over its various patterns, see Streeck and Thelen (2005).

  5. 5.

     Unfortunately, I do not know any study that analyses how a removal of technical barriers to trade would affect those companies that are currently producing only for the Ukrainian market but would need to prove conformity with EU standards as soon as the ACAA is concluded. It can be assumed that the percentage of production costs that Ukrainian manufacturers, who are currently producing only for domestic and CIS markets, would need to invest is significantly higher than the 4.4% of production costs that Ukrainian companies exporting machinery already to the EU market would save as soon as the industrial standards regime in Ukraine is aligned with the EU model (ECORYS & CASE 2007; Jakubiak 2006)

  6. 6.

     These are standardization, certification, conformity assessment, and market surveillance.

  7. 7.

     Again, there is no need to analyze to what extent the capacity of the supply side to change institutions explains the change in economic institutions in the Ukrainian case because actors will not use their capacities without incentives.

  8. 8.

     For more information, consult the project’s homepage at http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/uspp.nsf/Content/Home, latest access on August 10, 2008.

  9. 9.

     DSSU (2006).

  10. 10.

     This concerns the Low Voltage Directive. The problem, however, is that Ukrmetrteststandard is still part of the Ukrainian regulator DSSU. In order to align with EU requirements, Ukrmetrteststandard has to be separated from DSSU.

  11. 11.

     Since 1993, Ukrainian regulators have been cooperating with the International Standards Organization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) due to the start of WTO negotiations. Cooperation with the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrical Standardization (CENELEC) started only in 2004 due to efforts by European experts working for the mentioned TACIS projects between 2003 and 2004. As a result, DSSU acquired the status of a partner authority with CEN and the status of an associate with CENELEC, in 2005.

  12. 12.

     As previously mentioned, the World Bank Group launched a project aimed at improving Ukraine’s business environment pursued by the International Finance Cooperation (IFC) in 2001.

  13. 13.

     The law is supposed to disentangle the premarket control of industrial products from the regulatory body and assign it to the manufacturers. It further released the regulator from pursuing inspections and assigns these tasks to separate public or private bodies. See European Commission (2005).

  14. 14.

     DSSU introduced the Public Council following a Presidential Order of 2004 and a related Order of the Cabinet of Minister of Ukraine of May 2005. For more detailed information, consult DSSU’s homepage at http://www.dssu.gov.ua/control/en/publish/article/main?art_id=87458cat_id=87313, last accessed on August 10, 2008.

  15. 15.

     The European Commission, however, plans to address Ukrainian companies through a number of TACIS projects in order to disseminate information from 2008 onwards (interview 8).

References

  • AFNOR-SWEDAC-UNI Consortium (2004). The European Union’s programme “Application of a Foreign Trade Regime – Standards, Technical Regulations and Conformity Assessment in Ukraine,” Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslund, A. (2007). The Impact of the Outside World. In A. Aslund (Ed.), How Capitalism Was Built (pp. 281–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004). Ukraine Trade Policy Study (In Two Volumes), Volume II: Main report, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit Europe and Central Asia Region. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M.W., Knill, C., & Pitschel, D. (2007). Differential Europeanization in Eastern Europe: The Impact of Diverse EU Regulatory Governance Patterns. Journal of European Integration, 29(4), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, L. (2002). Making Markets and Eastern Enlargement: Diverging Convergence. West European Politics, 25(2), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. (2008). Transnational Integration Regimes as Development Programs. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, A., & Handler-Chayes, A. (1993). On Compliance. International Organization, 47(2), 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (Eds) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L. (2007). Marketization: From Intellectual Agenda to Global Policy-Making. In M.-L. Djelic & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds), Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (pp. 53–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Eds) (2007). Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DSSU (2006). Green Paper on Adapting Domestic Legislation on Technical Regulation and Consumer Policy to European Standards [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 15 November 2007, from http://www.icps.com.ua/doc/Green%2009%20-%20Technical%20Regulation%20Committee%20E.pdf

  • Dubrovskyi, V., Paskhaver, A., Verkhovodova, L., & Blaszczyk, B. (2007). Conditions of Resuming and Completing Privatization in Ukraine. Kyiv/Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1938). The Rules of Sociological Method (8th ed.). Translated by Sarah A. Solovay and John H. Mueller, edited by E.G. Catlin. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden. Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECORYS & CASE. (2007). Global Analysis Report for the EU-Ukraine TSIA – Final report, August 2007, Retrieved 20 August 2007, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/june/tradoc_135010.pdf

  • Emerson, M. (2006) (Ed.). Prospects for Deep Free Trade between the European Union and Ukraine. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Business Association (EBA) (2007). Barriers to Investment in Ukraine, Kyiv. Retrieved 16 November 2007, from http://www.eba.com.ua/files/Investment_paper/Inv_Paper_2007_ENG.pdf

  • European Business Association (EBA) (2008): The Annual Report 2007, Kyiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994). Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities, and their Member States and Ukraine. Retrieved 12 January 2007, from http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/ceeca/pca/pca_ukraine.pdf

  • European Commission (2000). Guide to the implementation of directives based on the New Approach and the Global Approach [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 8 February 2008, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/newapproach.htm

  • European Commission (2004): European Neighbourhood Policy Strategy Paper, COM (2004)373, Brussels, 12 May 2004 [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 10 December 2007, from http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/strategy/strategy_paper_en.pdf

  • European Commission (2005). The EU-Ukraine Action Plan, 21 February 2005 [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 10 January 2007, from http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/action_plans/ukraine_enp_ap_final_en.pdf

  • European Commission (2006a). Ukraine: Action Plan for the Free Movement of Industrial Products, 21 February 2006 [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 10 October 2007, from http://www.dssu.gov.uacontrolenarchivedocviewtypeId=87519sortBy=1orderBy=1docId=87520docs_stind=1

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006b). Barrier Fiche [0689] Industrial Standards and Conformity Assessment in Ukraine, Market Access Database provided by DG Trade [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 18 February 2008, from http://mkaccdb.eu.int/madb_barriers/barriers_details.htm?barrier_id=970170&; version=2

  • European Commission (2008). Progress Report Ukraine, Commission Staff Working Document, Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament ‘Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2007, SEC(2008) 402, Brussels, 3 April 2008 [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 10 June 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/progress2008/sec08_402_en.pdf.

  • Frankel, J., & Romer, D. (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review, 89, 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foundation for Effective Governance (FEG) (2008): Ukraine’s Economic Development Agenda for 2008–2015, Preliminary Version for Discussion, 9 April 2008, Kyiv. Retrieved 20 May 2008, from http://www.feg.org.ua/docs/ua_economics_en.pdf.

  • George, A.L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., & Wyman, D.L. (Eds.). (1990). Manufacturing Miracles: paths of industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, T. (2004). The European Economic Area: A Model for the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy? Perspectives on European Politics and Societies, 5(2), 171–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. (2006). Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution. External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations. World Politics, 58(4), 623–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubiak, M. (Ed.). (2006). Non-Tariff Barriers in Ukrainian Export to EU, Case Report No. 68. Warsaw: Centre for Social and Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. (2006). New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44,(1), 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, J. (2008). FTA+ statt Mitgliedschaft: Über ukrainische Interessenlagen und europäische Handlungsspielräume. Ukraine-Analysen, 44, Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, 7–11. Retrieved 1 October 2008, from http://www.laender-analysen.de/dlcounter/dlcounter.php?url=/ukraine/pdf/UkraineAnalysen44.pdf

  • Lederman, D., Maloney, W.F., & Servén, L. (2005). Lessons from NAFTA for Latin America and the Caribbean. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1978). Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (Ed.). (2005). International Institutions in the New Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, M. (1995). State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia. World Politics, 47(2), 210–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt, C., & Pistor, K. (2008). Law and Capitalism: What Corporate Crises Reveal about Legal Systems and Economic Development Around the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movchan, V., & Sysenko, N. (2007). Mezhdu rynkami Rossii i EC [Electronic Version]. Otechectvennye zapiski, 34(11). Retrieved 20 February, 2008 from http://www.strana-oz.ru/?numid=34&article=1410

  • Olson, M. (2000). Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorship. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, M., & Schmitz, H.-P. (2006). The New Transnationalism and Comparative Politics. Comparative Politics, 38(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleines, H. (2005). Ukrainische Seilschaften. Informelle Einflussnahme in der ukrainischen Wirtschaftspolitik 1992–2004. Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puglisi, R. (2008). A Window to the World? Oligarchs and Foreign Policy in Ukraine. In S. Fischer (Ed.), Ukraine: Quo vadis? Chaillot Paper No. 108 (pp. 55–86). Paris: Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyuk, O. (2006). Ukraine: Foreign Trade and Industrial Restructuring. Paper prepared within the 6th EU Framework Program project “Industrial restructuring in the NIS: experience of and lessons from the new EU Member States” (INDEUNIS, No.516751). Retrieved 2 March 2008, from http://indeunis.wiiw.ac.at/index.php?action=filedownload&id=66.

  • Rodrick, D. (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains? In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 305–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2007). Europeanisation beyond Europe [Electronic Version]. Living Review on European Governance, 2. Retrieved 12 January 2008, from http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2007-1.

  • Sedelmaier, U. (2006). Europeanisation in new member and candidate states [Electronic Version]. Living Review on European Governance, 1. Retrieved 12 February 2007, from http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2006-3.

  • Simon, H.A. (1995). Rationality in Political Behavior. Political Psychology, 16(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds), Beyond Continuity (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UEPLAC. (2008). Regulatory impact analysis of the introduction of the EC Low Voltage directive into Ukrainian legislation, Kyiv 10 April 2008. Retrieved 20 April 2008, from http://ueplac.kiev.ua/downloads/ria/lvd_full_ria_for_ukraine.pdf

  • Weber, M. (1949). Objectivity. In M. Weber (Ed.), Social Science and Social Policy. In the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited By Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Translated by Ephraim Fishoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolczuk, R. (2003). Ukraine‘s Foreign and Security Policy 1991–2000. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolczuk, K. (2008). Ukraine and its Relations with the EU in the Context of the European Neighbourhood Policy. In S. Fischer (Ed.), Ukraine: Quo Vadis? Chaillot Paper No. 108 (pp. 87–117). Paris: Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolowski, P. (2008). Ukrainian Politics after the Orange Revolution. In S. Fischer (Ed.), Ukraine: Quo Vadis? Chaillot Paper No. 108 (pp. 25–53). Paris: Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank László Bruszt, Ronald Holzhacker, Dorothee Bohle, Sabine Fischer as well as all participants of the European Research Colloquium on the Transnationalization of Economies, States, and Civil Societies: New Challenges for Governance in Europe, for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this chapter. Further, particular thanks are owed to Michael Emerson, Ildar Gazizullin and Olga Shumylo, who helped in various ways during the research. The usual disclaimer remains.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Langbein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langbein, J. (2009). The Transnationalization of Change in Economic Institutions: The Case of Industrial Standards Regulations in Ukraine. In: Bruszt, L., Holzhacker, R. (eds) The Transnationalization of Economies, States, and Civil Societies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89339-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics