The Role of the United Nations in the Prevention and Repression of International Terrorism



The role of the United Nations (UN) in the prevention and repression of terrorism, which has progressively developed over the last decades, has been significantly accelerated since the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. While having identified terrorism early on as an issue needing to be addressed, the development and widespread adoption of concrete measures aimed at combating this phenomenon within the UN framework have historically been severely hindered by geopolitical realities as well as marked differences in the strategies espoused by the organization’s Member States. As a result of these difficulties, the historical approach taken by the UN in addressing the issue of terrorism has been the development of a pragmatic piecemeal legal framework, aimed at criminalizing certain “terrorist acts” subject to widespread agreement. With the passing of the decolonization period and the end of the Cold War, some of the substantive legal and political issues of contention surrounding terrorism have subsided heralding the advent of an environment more conducive to agreement.

The principle catalyst for change has, however, been the events of 11 September 2001 that have illustrated both the scale of the global threat posed by terrorism as well as the need for a comprehensive strategy to combat it. The UN has been at the vanguard of the push to develop this new strategy and has established a multi-faceted anti-terrorism framework. Despite the fact that the best known and most controversial UN initiatives against terrorism are primarily those of a coercive nature stemming from the adoption of binding Security Council resolutions, UN action against terrorism is by no means limited to these measures.

This chapter aims to shed light of the various institutions and mechanisms within the UN structure that contribute to the combating of terrorism and to provide a summary appraisal of their effectiveness.


United Nations Security Council Terrorist Attack International Criminal Secretary General 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Al-Jumaili, D. (2008). Stationen im Kampf Gegen Die Terrorismusfinazierung – New York-Brüssel-Berlin. Neue Juristische Online Zeitschrift 2008 issue 4, 188–211.Google Scholar
  2. Betti, S. (2006). The Duty to Bring Terrorists to Justice and Discretionary Prosecution. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 1104–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bianchi, A. (2004). Enforcing International Law Norms Against Terrorism: Achievements and Prospects. In A. Bianchi (Ed.), Enforcing International Law Norms against Terrorism (pp. 491–534). Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bianchi, A. (2006). Security Council’s Anti-Terror Resolutions and Their Implementation by Member States: An Overview. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 1044–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Condorelli.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, D. (2006). The Black Hole of a UN Blacklist. The Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  7. Fassbender, B. (2004). The Security Council and International Terrorism. In A. Bianchi (Ed.), Enforcing International Law Norms against Terrorism (pp. 83–102). Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Foot, R. (2007). The United Nations, Counter-Terrorism, and Human Rights: Institutional Adaptation and Embedded Ideas. Human Rights Quarterly 29, 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gehr, W. (2003). Le Comite contre le terrorisme et la résolution 1373 (2001) du Conseil de sécurité. Actualité et droit international, January 2003, available at (consulted August 15, 2008).
  10. Gross, L. (1973). International Terrorism and International Criminal Jurisdiction. American Journal of International Law, 67(3), 508–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinojosa Martinez, L.M. (2008). The Legislative Role of the Security Council in its Fight against Terrorism: Legal, Political and Practical Limits. International Criminal Law Quarterly 57, 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hmoud, M. (2006). Negotiating the Draft Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism: Major Bones of Contention. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 1031–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolb, R. (2004). The Exercise of Criminal Jurisdiction over International Terrorists. In A. Bianchi (Ed.), Enforcing International Law Norms against Terrorism (pp. 227–282). Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Kovacs, P. (2002). Le grand précédent: la Société des Nations et son action après l’attentat contre Alexandre, roi de Yougoslavie. European Integration Studies , 1, 30–40.Google Scholar
  15. Krueger, A. B., & Maleckova, J. (2003). Education, Poverty and Terrorism: is there a Causal Connection? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laborde, J.P.Google Scholar
  17. Laborde, J.-P., & DeFeo, M. (2006). Problems and Prospects of Implementing UN Action against Terrorism. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 1087–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nuotio, K. (2006). Terrorism as a Catalyst for the Emergence, Harmonization and Reform of Criminal Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 998–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olivier, C. (2004). Human Rights Law and the International Fight against Terrorism: How Do Security Council Resolutions Impact on State’s Obligations Under International Human Rights Law (Revisiting Security Council Resolution 1373)? Nordic Journal of International Law , 73, 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saul, B. (2006). The Legal Response of the League of Nations to Terrorism. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Szasz, P.C. (2002). The Security Council Starts Legislating. American Journal of International Law 96, 901–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weigend, T. (2006). The Universal Terrorist: The International Community Grappling with a Definition. Journal of International Criminal Justice 4, 912–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Formerly Head of International Criminal Law SectionMPI for Foreign and International Criminal LawFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations