Dynamic-Clamp pp 141-163 | Cite as

In Vivo Dynamic-Clamp Manipulation of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Conductances: Functional Roles of Shunting Inhibition and IBK in Rat and Cat Cortex

Part of the Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience book series (NEUROSCI, volume 1)


We present in vivo dynamic-clamp electrophysiological recordings to characterize the influences of shunting inhibition and the potassium current I BK on the input–output (I/O) transfer function of cortical neurons, in response to both artificial (injected current or conductance) and functional visual stimuli. In comparison to previous experimental and theoretical studies, we find that realistic levels of shunting inhibition have a significant divisive effect on the firing gain. We also quantitatively characterize the effect of shunting inhibition on threshold and saturation. Shunting inhibition applied by dynamic-clamp also has a non-linear effect on visual responses, not only reducing the response but also significantly changing the timing of the response. We confirm predictions that I BK facilitates spike firing, despite this being a hyperpolarizing current. This effect is demonstrated by an increase in both the gain of the I/O transfer function, e.g. the f/I curve, and visual responses.


Spike Train Visual Response Hippocampal Pyramidal Cell Shunting Inhibition Atropine Methyl Nitrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by an HFSP grant (RGP0049/2002) and an Agence Nationale de Recherche grant (FUNVISYNIN) to Dr. Lyle J. Graham. We also gratefully acknowledge Thomas Gener for his help in developing the protocols and participating in early experiments. We also acknowledge the important contribution of the authors of the VisionEgg and the G-Clamp software packages.


  1. Anderson J, Carandini M, Ferster D (2000) Orientation tuning of input conductance, excitation and inhibition in cat primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 84:909–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson J, Lampl I, Gillespie D, Ferster D (2001) Membrane potential and conductance changes underlying length tuning of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 21:2104–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernander O, Douglas RJ, Martin KAC, Koch C (1991) Synaptic background activity influences spatiotemporal integration in single pyramidal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:11569–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg-Graham LJ (1987) Modelling the somatic electrical behaviour of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. MSEE Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Borg-Graham L, Monier C, Frégnac Y (1998) Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature 389:369–73.Google Scholar
  6. Borg-Graham LJ (1999) Interpretations of data and mechanisms for hippocampal pyramidal cell models. In Cerebral cortex, eds. Ulinski PS, Jones EG, & Peters A, pp. 19–138. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brizzi L, Meunier C, Zytnicki D, Donnet M, Hansel D, LaMotte D’Incamps B, Van Vreeswijk C (2004) How shunting inhibition affects the discharge of lumbar motoneurones. A dynamic clamp study in anaesthetised cats. J Physiol 558(Pt 2):671–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capaday C, Van Vreeswijk C (2006) Direct control of firing rate gain by dendritic shunting inhibition. J Integr Neurosci 5:199–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chance FS, Abbott LF, Reyes AD (2002) Gain modulation from background synaptic input. Neuron v35, 773–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Destexhe A, Paré D (1999) Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 81:1531–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fellous J-M, Rudolph M, Destexhe A, Sejnowski TJ (2003) Synaptic background noise controls the input/output characteristics of single cells in an in vitro model of in vivo activity. Neuroscience 122:811–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham L, Kado R (2002) The neuron’s biophysical mosaic and its computational relevance. In the Handbook for Brain Theory and Neural Networks, ed. Arbib M, 2nd edition, pp. 170–175. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Graham LJ (2006) Not what you’d expect: Paradoxical roles of Na+ and K+ currents on excitability. Paper presented at the Modelling the Brain’s Labyrinth Meeting, Hieraklion, Greece.Google Scholar
  14. Graham LJ (2007) Not what you'd expect: Paradoxical roles of Na+ and K+ currents on excitability. Paper presented at the Quantitative Neuron Modeling Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  15. Graham LJ, Schramm A, Gener T (2007) The modulation of firing gain and threshold by shunting inhibition in cortical neurons in vivo, Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting Abstracts, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Gu N, Vervaeke K, Storm JF (2007) BK potassium channels facilitate high-frequency firing and cause early spike frequency adaptation in rat CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Physiol 580(3):859–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haider B, Duque A, Hasenstaub A, McCormick D (2006) Neocortical network activity in vivo is generated through a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition. J Neurosci 26:4535–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haider H, Duque A, Hasenstaub AR, Yu Y, McCormick DA (2007) Enhancement of visual responsiveness by spontaneous local network activity in vivo. J Neurophysiol 4186–202.Google Scholar
  19. Higley M, Contreras D (2006) Balanced excitation and inhibition determine spike timing during frequency adaptation. J Neurosci 26:448–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirsch JA, Alonso JM, Reid RC, Martinez LM (1998) Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 18:9517–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Holt G.R, Koch C (1997) Shunting inhibition does not have a divisive effect on firing rates. Neural Comput 9:1001–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingham NJ, McAlpine D (2005) GABAergic inhibition controls neural gain in inferior colliculus neurons sensitive to interaural time differences. J Neurosci 25(26):6187–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kullmann PHM, Wheeler DW, Beacom J, Horn JP (2004) Implementation of a fast 16-bit dynamic clamp using LabVIEW-RT. J Neurophysiol 91:542–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreiner L, Jaeger D (2003) Synaptic shunting by a baseline of synaptic conductances modulates responses to inhibitory input volleys in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Cerebellum 3:112–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manuel M, Meunier C, Donnet M, Zytnicki D (2005) How much afterhyperpolarization conductance is recruited by an action potential? A dynamic-clamp study in cat lumbar motoneurons. J Neurosci 25(39):8917–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marino J, Schummers J, Lyon D, Schwabe L, Beck O, Wiesing P, Obermayer K, Sur M (2005) Invariant computations in local cortical networks with balanced excitation and inhibition. Nat Neurosci 8:194–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marrion NV, Tavalin SJ (1998) Selective activation of Ca2+-activated K+ channels by co-localized Ca2+ channels in hippocampal neurons. Nature 395:900–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCormick DA, Connors BW, Lighthall JW, Prince DA (1985) Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny neurons of the neocortex. J Neurophysiol 54:782–806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell SJ, Silver RA (2003) Shunting inhibition modulates neuronal gain during synaptic excitation. Neuron 38:433–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monier C, Chavane F, Baudot P, Graham L, Frégnac Y (2003) Orientation and direction selectivity of excitatory and inhibitory inputs in visual cortical neurons: A diversity of combinations produces spike tuning. Neuron v37:663–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prescott SA, De Koninck YD (2003) Gain control of firing rate by shunting inhibition: Roles of synaptic noise and dendritic saturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(4):2076–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Priebe N, Ferster D (2005) Direction selectivity of excitation and inhibition in simple cells of the cat primary visual cortex. Neuron 45:133–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Priebe N, Ferster D. (2006) Mechanisms underlying cross-orientation suppression in cat visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 9:552–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rapp M, Yarom Y, Segev I (1992) The impact of parallel fiber background activity on the cable properties of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neural Comput 4:518–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudolph M, Destexhe A (2003) A fast-conducting, stochastic integrative mode for neocortical neurons in vivo. J Neurosci 23:2466–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schramm A, Graham LJ (2007) Touch ’n Zap: A new technique for blind whole-cell patch recordings, 8e Colloque de la Société des Neurosciences, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  37. Semyanov A, Walker MC, Kullmann DM, Silver RA (2004) Tonically active GABA A receptors: modulating gain and maintaining the tone. Trends Neurosci 27(5): 262–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shao LR, Halvorsrud R, Borg-Graham L, Storm JF (1999) The role of BK-type Ca2+-dependent K+ channels in spike broadening during repetitive firing in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Physiol v521.1:135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stell BM, Brickley SG, Tang CY, Farrant M, Mody I (2003) Neuroactive steroids reduce neuronal excitability by selectively enhancing tonic inhibition mediated by {delta} subunit-containing GABAA receptors. PNAS 100(24):1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Storm J F (1990). Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Prog Brain Res 83:161–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Storm J, Borg-Graham L, Adams P (1987) A passive component of the afterdepolarization (ADP) in rat hippocampal cells. Biophys J 51:65a.Google Scholar
  42. Straw AD, Warrant EJ, O’Carroll DC (2006) A 'bright zone' in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity. J Exp Biol 209(21):4339–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tan AY, Zhang LI, Merzenich MM, Schreiner CE. (2004) Tone-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances of primary auditory cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol 92:630–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ulrich D (2003) Differential arithmetic of shunting inhibition for voltage and spike rate in neocortical pyramidal cells. Eur J Neurosci 18:2159–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Velumian AA, Carlen PL (1999) Differential control of three after-hyperpolarizations in rat hippocampal neurones by intracellular calcium buffering. J Physiol 517:201–16.Google Scholar
  46. Vergara C, Latorre R, Marrion NV, Adelman JP (1998) Calcium-activated potassium channels. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:321–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wehr M, Zador AM (2003) Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex. Nature 426:442–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wehr MS, Zador A (2005) Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex. Neuron 47:325–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilent W, Contreras D (2004) Synaptic responses to whisker deflections in rat barrel cortex as a function of cortical layer and stimulus intensity. J Neurosci 24:3985–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilent W, Contreras D (2005) Dynamics of excitation and inhibition underlying stimulus selectivity in rat somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:1364–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang LI, Tan AY, Schreiner CE, Merzenich MM (2003) Topography and synaptic shaping of direction selectivity in primary auditory cortex. Nature 424:201–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neurophysiology of Visual Computation Laboratory, Laboratory of Neurophysics and PhysiologyCNRS UMR 8119, Université Paris Descartes75006 ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations