Simulating In Vivo Background Activity in a Slice with the Dynamic Clamp

  • Frances Chance
  • Larry F. Abbott
Part of the Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience book series (NEUROSCI, volume 1)


Neurons in vivo receive a large amount of internally generated “background” activity in addition to synaptic input directly driven by an external stimulus. Stimulus-driven and background synaptic inputs interact, through the nonlinearities of neuronal integration, in interesting ways. The dynamic clamp can be used in vitro to duplicate background input, allowing the experimenter to take advantage of the accessibility of neurons in vitro while still studying them under in vivo conditions. In this chapter we discuss some results from experiments in which a neuron is driven by current injection that simulates a stimulus-driven input as well as dynamic-clamp-generated background activity. One of the effects uncovered in this way is multiplicative gain modulation, achieved by varying the level of background synaptic input. We discuss how the dynamic clamp was used to discover this effect and also how to choose parameters to simulate in vivo background synaptic input in slice neurons.


Firing Rate Background Activity Synaptic Input Input Current Membrane Conductance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Research supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH-58754) an NIH Director’s Pioneer Award, part of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, through grant number 5-DP1-OD114-02 to LFA and by NSF-IOB-0446129, funds provided by the University of California and an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship to FSC.


  1. Abbott LF and Chance FS (2005) Drivers and modulators from push-pull and balanced synaptic input. Prog Brain Res 149:147–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azouz R (2005) Dynamic spatiotemporal synaptic integration in cortical neurons: neuronal gain, revisited. J Neurophysiol 94:2785–2796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JS, Lampl I, Gillespie DC and Ferster D (2000) The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. Science 290:1968–1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baca SM, Marin-Burgin A, Wagenaar DA and Kristan WB (2008) Widespread inhibition proportional to excitation controls the gain of a leech behavioral circuit. Neuron 57:276–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg-Graham LJ, Monier, C, and Frgnac Y. (1998) Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature 393:369–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chance FS (2007) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for characterizing synaptic efficacy. J Neurophysiol 97:1799–1808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chance FS, Abbott LF and Reyes AD (2002) Gain modulation through background synaptic input. Neuron 35:773–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desai NS and Walcott EC (2006) Synaptic bombardment modulates muscarinic effects in forelimb motor cortex. J Neurosci 26:2215–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Destexhe A and Paré D (1999) Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 81:1531–1547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Destexhe A, Rudolph M, Fellous J-M and Sejnowski TJ (2001) Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo-like activity in neocortical neurons. Neuroscience 107:13–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doiron B, Longtin A, Berman N and Maler L (2001) Subtractive and divisive inhibition: effects of voltage-dependent inhibitory conductances and noise. Neural Comput. 13:227–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fellous J-M, Rudolph M, Destexhe A, and Sejnowski TJ (2003) Synaptic background noise controls the input/output characteristics of single cells in an in vitro model of in vivo activity. Neuroscience 122:811–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fourcaud-Trocmé N and Brunel N (2005) Dynamics of the instantaneous firing rate in response to changes in input statistics. J Comput Neurosci 18:311–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabbiani F, Midtgaard J and Knopfel T (1994) Synaptic integration in a model of cerebellar granule cells. J Neurophysiol 72:999–1009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haider B, Duque A, Hasenstaub AR and McCormick DA (2006) Neocortical network activity in vivo is generated through a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition. J Neurosci 26:4535–4545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heggelund P and Albus K (1978) Response variability and orientation discrimination of single cells in striate cortex of cat. Exp Brain Res 32:197–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirsch JA, Alonso J-M, Reid RC and Martinez LM (1998) Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 18:9517–9528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hô N and Destexhe A (2000) Synaptic background activity enhances the responsiveness of neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 84:1488–1496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Holt GR and Koch C (1997) Shunting inhibition does not have a divisive effect on firing rates. Neural Comput 9:1001–1013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holt GR, Softky GW, Koch C and Douglas RJ (1996) Comparison of discharge variability in vitro and in cat visual cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol 75:1806–1814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaeger D and Bower JM (1999) Synaptic control of spiking in cerebellar Purkinje cells: dynamic current clamp based on model conductances. J Neurosci 19:6090–6101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khorsand P and Chance FS (2008) Transient responses to rapid changes in mean and variance in spiking models. PLoS One 3:e3786.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell SJ and Silver RA (2003) Shunting inhibition modulates neuronal gain during synaptic excitation. Neuron 38:433–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okun M and Lampl I (2008) Instantaneous correlation of excitation and inhibition during ongoing and sensory-evoked activities. Nat Neurosci 11:535–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piwkowska Z, Pospischil M, Brette R, Sliwa J, Rudolph-Lilith M, Bal T and Destexhe A (2008) Characterizing synaptic conductance fluctuations in cortical neurons and their influence on spike generation. J Neurosci Methods 169:302–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prescott SA and De Koninck Y (2003) Gain control of firing rate by shunting inhibition: roles of synaptic noise and dendritic saturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2076–2081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudolph M and Destexhe A (2003) Characterization of subthreshold voltage fluctuations in neuronal membranes. Neural Comput 15:2577–2618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Santamaria F, Jaeger D, De Schutter E and Bower JM (2002) Modulatory effects of parallel fiber and molecular layer interneuron synaptic activity on purkinje cell responses to ascending segment input: a modeling study. J Comput Neurosci 13:217–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF (1976) Short-term response variability of monkey striate neurons. Brain Res 105:347–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shadlen MN and Newsome WT (1994). Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:569–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF (1976) Short-term response variability of monkey striate neurons. Brain Res 105:347–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shadlen MN and Newsome WT (1994). Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Curr Opin Neurobiol 4:569–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, Badoual M, Bal T, and McCormick DA (2003) Barrages of synaptic activity control the gain and sensitivity of cortical neurons. J Neurosci 23:10388–10401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Silberberg G, Bethge M, Markram H, Pawelzik K and Tsodyks M (2004) Dynamics of population rate codes in ensembles of neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 91 :704–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Softky WR and Koch C (1993) The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J Neurosci 13:334–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevens CF and Zador AM (1998) Input synchrony and the irregular firing of cortical neurons. Nature Neurosci 3:210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Troyer TW and Miller KD (1997) Physiological gain leads to high ISI variability in a simple model of a cortical regular spiking cell. Neural Comput 9:971–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vogels R, Spileers W, and Orban GA (1989) The response variability of striate cortical neurons in the behaving monkey. Exp Brain Res 77:432–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Waters J and Helmchen F (2006) Background synaptic activity is sparse in neocortex. J Neurosci 26:8267–8277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wenning G, Hoch T, and Obermayer K (2005) Detection of pulses in a colored noise setting. Phys Rev E 71:e021902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolfart J, Debay D, Le Masson G, Destexhe A and Bal T (2005) Synaptic background activity controls spike transfer from thalamus to cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:1760–1767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zsiros V and Hestrin S (2005) Background synaptic conductance and precision of EPSP-spike coupling at pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol 93:3248–3256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorUniversity of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations