HCI and Design Research Education

A Creative Approach
Part of the IFIP – International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 289)

This paper describes the latest insights in HCI education inspired and informed by the creative disciplines, how education is implemented, and how it could be fed back into the artistic fields. It contains examples, contrasts different methods, and discusses and concludes the findings for HCI education in general. A course on HCI is described which is supported by a creative approach, related to art, architecture and music. Experiences are described in of HCI tools and insights such as structured design methods, interaction frameworks and interface design heuristics relevant to the arts fields.


Interface Design Multimodal Interaction Student Assistant Design Discipline Artistic Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bongers, A. J., Investigating the Parallel Use of the Sense of Touch in Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction. Unpublished MSc. Thesis, UCL London, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bongers, A.J., Physical Interaction in the Electronic Arts, Interaction Theory and Interfacing Techniques for Real-time Performance. In: Wanderley, M.M. and Battier, M, Trends in Gestural Control of Music. IRCAM Paris, pp. 41 – 70, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bongers A. J., Interactivating Spaces, Proceedings of the Systems Research in the Arts conference, Germany, August 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bongers, A. J. Interaction with our Electronic Environment; an e-cological approach to physical interface design. Cahier Book series, Hogeschool van Utrecht, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bongers, A. J., Interactivation—towards an e-cology of people, our technological environment, and the arts. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bongers, A. J. and. van der Veer, G. C. Towards a Multimodal Interaction Space, categorisation and applications. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, special issue on Movement-Based Interaction, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denning, P. J. (ed.), The Invisible Future, the seamless integration of technology into everyday life. McGraw-Hill, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G and Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaver, W., Technology Affordances. In: Proceedings of the CHI conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson, J. J., The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Miffling, Boston, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson, J. J., The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guallart, V. (ed.), Media House Project — the house is the computer, the structure is the network. IaaC /Actar Barcelona, 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Igoe, T. and O'Sullivan, D., Physical Computing—sensing and controlling the physical world with computers. Thomson Course Technology PTR, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCullough, M. Abstracting Craft, The practised digital hand. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McLuhan, M., Understanding Media, the extensions of man. Routledge, 1964.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller, D. L., The Lewis Mumford Reader. Pantheon Books, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mumford, L. Art and Technics. Columbia University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norman, D. A., The Design of Everyday Things. MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Norman, D. A., Emotional Design. Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oosterhuis, K., Hyperbodies— towards an E-motive architecture. Birkhäuser, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pashler, H. E., The Psychology of Attention. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Picard, R. W., Affective Computing. MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Postman, N., Technopoly—the surrender of culture to technology. Vintage Books, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reeskamp, W., Rutten, D. H. G., Vegt, N. J. H., Toering, E. B. and Bongers, A. J., Überzapper, a different kind of remote control. Proceedings of the Designing Pleasurable Product Interfaces conference, pp. 510–511, Eindhoven 2005.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rogers, Y, Sharp, S. and Preece, J. Interaction Design, beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, 2nd edition, 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosengren, K. E. Communication, an Introduction. Sage, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schomaker, L., Münch, S., and Hartung, K., (eds.) A Taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System. Report of the ESPRIT project 8579: MIAMI, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sluis, R. van de, Bongers, A. J., Kohar, H., Jansen, J., Pauws, S. C., Eggen, J. H., and Eggenhuisen, H. WWICE User Interface Concepts. Philips Report, company restricted, September 1997.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sluis, R. van de, Eggen, J. H., Kohar, H., Jansen, J. User Interface for an In-Home Environment. Proceedings of the Interact conference, Tokyo 2001.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spuybroek, L. Deep Surface—the unvisual image. In: Architectural Design magazine, special issue on Hypersurface Architecture II, 69/9-10, Wiley&Sons, 1999.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tufte, E. R., Envisioning Information, Graphics Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Veer, G.C. van der, Welie, M., Task Based Groupware Design: putting theory into practice, In: D. Boyarski. W.A. Kellogg (eds ), Proceedings of DIS - Designing Interactive Systems conference, pp. 326–337, 2000.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Veer, G. C. van der, Bongers, A. J. and Vyas, D., DUTCH - teaching method-based design. Proceedings of the IFIP Convivio workshop on HCI and Education, Graz, 2006.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wichary, M., E-learning: the HCI example. Final report for the USI post-masters programme, published by the Stan Ackermans Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology, SydneyUltimo NSWAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceOpen University NetherlandsThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations