Advertisement

Realising the Potential of Serenity in Emerging AmI Ecosystems:Implications and Challenges

  • Álvaro Armenteros
  • Laura García
  • Antonio Muñoz
  • Antonio Maña
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Information Security book series (ADIS, volume 45)

Abstract

In this chapter we describe the potential of SERENITY in Ambient Intelligence (AmI) Ecosystems. As a proof of concept, we describe the implementation of a prototype based on the application of the SERENITY model (including processes, artefacts and tools) to an industrial AmI scenario. A complete description of this prototype, along with all Security and Dependability (S&D) artefacts used is provided in this chapter. Besides, the chapter also provides a complete description of one of the S&D Patterns used in the prototype, in order both, to give a global view of SERENITY and to provide useful details about the realization of this scenario.

Keywords

Wireless Network Access Control Access Control Policy Trusted Platform Module Extensible Authentication Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiser M, Demers A, and Hauser C (1989) The Portable Common Runtime Approach to Interoperability. ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aboba B, Calhoun P (2003) RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service) Support For Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP). IETF RFC 3579 (Updates: RFC 2869).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiba M, Dommety G, Eklund M, Mitton D, Aboba B (2008) Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS). IETF RFC 5176 (Obsoletes: RFC 3576).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    IEEE 802.11i-2004: Amendment 6: Medium Access Control (MAC) Security Enhancements IEEE Standards (2004-07-23)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bulbul HI, Batmaz I, Ozel M. (2008) Wireless network security: comparison of WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) mechanism, WPA (Wi-Fi Protected Access) and RSN (Robust Security Network) security protocols. Proc 1st International Conference on Forensic applications (e-Forensics), Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fei Y, Huanguo Z, Zhidong S, Liqiang Z, Weizhong Q (2006) Improved Wireless Grid Security Infrastructure Based on Trusted Computing Technology. Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2006.International Conference.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lenovo ThinkVantage® Client Security Solution. Lenovo Innovation products reference web site. http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/think/thinkvantagetech/security.html. Accessed 24 November 2008.
  8. 8.
    Čapkun S, Čagalj M. (2006) Integrity regions: authentication through presence in wireless networks in Proc 5th ACM workshop on Wireless security (WiSE'06), Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cho Y Bao L (2006) Secure Access Control for Location-Based Applications in WLAN Systems in Proc of the 2nd International Workshop on Wireless and Sensor Networks Security (WSNS), Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    10 Ardagna C, Cremonini M, Damiani E et al (2006) Supporting location-based conditions in access control policies. Proc ACM Symposium on Information, computer and communications security (ASIACCS'06), Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Álvaro Armenteros
    • 1
  • Laura García
    • 2
  • Antonio Muñoz
    • 3
  • Antonio Maña
    • 4
  1. 1.Telefónica I+DMadridSpain
  2. 2.Telefónica I+DMadridSpain
  3. 3.Computer Science DepartmentInformática, Universidad de MálagaMálagaSpain
  4. 4.Computer Science DepartmentInformática, Universidad de MálagaMálagaSpain

Personalised recommendations