Advertisement

Utilization of the Social Fabric Matrix to Articulate a State System of Financial Aid for Public Schools and to Derive Conceptual Conclusions

  • F. Gregory Hayden
Chapter

Abstract

Central government education formulas for the distribution of funds to local public schools have a long history in numerous countries, with special importance at the state level in the United States. Such formulas have been formulated to express an array of concerns to include equity, ability to pay, adequacy, need, willingness to pay taxes, geographical sparcity, tax burdens, the political power to acquire more money for an area, and so forth. The differentiation and elaboration of school-aid formulas have led to the evolution of greater formula complexity and the emergence of very different kinds of school finance systems in different states. The social fabric matrix is utilized to articulate the Nebraska State system used for the distribution of financial aid to kindergarten- through- grade- 12 public schools. This demonstrates how states can model their systems in order to observe the interconnections through algebraic formula terms in order to determine the consequences of planned changes. The findings of the analysis are also drawn upon for conceptual conclusions about school-aid policy, rules, and systems.

Keywords

School District Limited English Proficiency Immigrant Student Institutional Organization Authority Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Elsner W (2007) Why meso? On ‘aggregation’ and ‘emergence’ and why and how the meso level is essential in social economics. Forum Social Econ 36(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Harcourt M, Wood G, Roper I (2007) The importance of legislated employment protection for worker commitment in coordinated market economies. J Econ Issues 41(4):961–980Google Scholar
  3. Hayden FG (1998) Normative analysis of instituted processes. In: Fayazmanesh S, MR Tool (eds) Institutionalist theory and applications: essays in honour of Paul Dale Bush, vol 2. Edward Elgar, North Hampton, MA, pp 89–107Google Scholar
  4. Hayden FG (2006) Policymaking for a good society: the social fabric matrix approach to policy analysis and program evolution. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. King RA, Swanson AD, Sweetland SR (2003) School finance: achieving standards with equity and efficiency. Allyn and Bacon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Morgan DC, Hayden FG (1970) Elementary and secondary education aid: toward an optimal program for the State Government of Texas. The University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  7. Musgrave RA (1961) Approaches to a fiscal theory of political federalism. In: Conference of Economic Research (ed) Public finances: needs, sources, and utilization. National Bureau. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 97–122Google Scholar
  8. Nebraska Department of Education (2006) Annual financial report of Nebraska school districts 2005–2006 AFR. http://ess.nde.state.ne.us/SchoolFinance/AFR/Downloads0506/afr.xls. Accessed 18 June 2008
  9. Nebraska Department of Education (2007) Tax equity and educational opportunities support act certification of 2006–2007 state aid. Education support services. Nebraska Department of Education, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  10. Nebraska legislative documents, revised statutes, chapter 79: schools http://uniweb.legislature.ne.gov/legaldocs/view.php?page=index_statutes (2008) Accessed 18 June 2008
  11. Schmid AA (2004) Conflict and cooperation: institutional and behavioral economics. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Gregory Hayden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations