Skip to main content

Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods with Various Data Preprocessing Procedures for Activation Detection in fMRI Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 38))

Abstract

In this study we compare five classification methods for detecting activation in fMRI data: Fisher linear discriminant, support vector machine, Gaussian nave Bayes, correlation analysis and k-nearest neighbor classifier. In order to enhance classifiers performance a variety of data preprocessing steps were employed. The results show that although kNN and linear SVM can classify active and nonactive voxels with less than 1.2% error, careful preprocessing of the data, including dimensionality reduction, outlier elimination, and denoising are important factors in overall classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Franc, V., Hlavác, V. Statistical pattern recognition toolbox for matlab. Center for Machine Perception, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Group, T.F.M. Spm5 manual. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Isabelle, G., Andre, E. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3, 1157–1182 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ku, S.-P., Gretton, A., Macke, J., Logothetis, N.K. Comparison of pattern recognition methods in classifying high-resolution bold signals obtained at high magnetic field in monkeys. Magn Reson Imaging 26, 1007–1014 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell, T., Hutchinson, R., Just, M.A., Niculescu, R.S., Pereira, F., Wang, X. Classifying instantaneous cognitive states from fmri data. In: Americal Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, Washington DC 469 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, T., Hutchinson, R., Niculescu, R.S., Pereira, F., Wang, X., Just, M., Newman, S. Learning to decode cognitive states from brain images. Mach Learn 57, 145–175 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K. Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mahdi Ramezani or Emad Fatemizadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramezani, M., Fatemizadeh, E. (2010). Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods with Various Data Preprocessing Procedures for Activation Detection in fMRI Data. In: Chaovalitwongse, W., Pardalos, P., Xanthopoulos, P. (eds) Computational Neuroscience. Springer Optimization and Its Applications(), vol 38. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88630-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics