Advertisement

The Gibbons pp 467-475 | Cite as

Canopy Bridges: An Effective Conservation Tactic for Supporting Gibbon Populations in Forest Fragments

  • Jayanta Das
  • Jihosuo Biswas
  • Parimal C. Bhattacherjee
  • S.S. Rao
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects book series (DIPR)

Introduction

In recent years, most forests in the range of the hoolock gibbon (Hoolock hoolock) have become fragmented due to forest conversion and selective logging (Das et al. this volume). Therefore, protection of populations in habitat fragments is critical for the conservation of hoolock gibbons. In the Borajan Reserve in the Bherjan-Borajan-Podumoni Wildlife Sanctuary in Tinsukia district, Assam, India, changes in land use patterns and removal of feeding and sleeping trees have reduced the quantity and quality of gibbon habitat. Following dramatic loss of habitat in Borajan from 1995 to 1997, a number of hoolock gibbon groups have been observed visiting private lands to exploit isolated food resources surrounded by areas of human use. This suggests that villages with fruit trees and bamboo groves near the fragmented forests have become foraging sites for the gibbons remaining in forest fragments.

Hoolocks specialize on patchily distributed fruits, and hoolocks living in intact...

Keywords

Food Patch Disturbed Habitat Wildlife Sanctuary Undisturbed Habitat Forest Village 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Great Ape Conservation Fund of the US Fish and Wildlife Service under grant agreement No. 98210-2-G382. We are grateful to the Primate Research Centre, Jodhpur, for providing constant support to the Northeast Centre of PRC. Scientific advice was given from time to time by Prof. S.M. Mohnot, Mr. David Ferguson, Mr. Fred Bagley, Prof. Charles Southwick, and Dr. Rob Horwich. We are also thankful to Mr. S. Doley, PCCF, Assam, and Mr. M.C. Malakar CCF (WL) Assam, for giving us permission to do this work and to the Department of Zoology, Gauhati University for expediting the grant money. Thanks to S. Lappan for assistance with Fig. 22.2. We extend our thanks to the local forest officials, Mr. Malakar, Mr. Gogoi and Mr. Phukan, and to our field assistants, Ram and Pradeep. Without the support from the local villagers, this research would not have been possible.

References

  1. Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choudhury, A. 2001. New primate sanctuary in Assam, India. Asian Primates 7:18–19.Google Scholar
  3. Das, J. 2002. Socioecology of hoolock gibbon: Hylobates hoolock hoolock (Harlan, 1834) in response to habitat change. (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Gauhati).Google Scholar
  4. Das, J. and Bhattacharjee, P.C. 2002. Conservation action plan for western hoolock gibbon part I. Guwuhati: Department of Zoology, Gauhati University.Google Scholar
  5. Das, J., Bhattacharjee, P.C., Biswas, J. and Chetry, D. 2005. Western hoolock gibbon: socioecology, threats and conservation action plan. Guwahati: Gauhati University and Primate Research Centre, Northeast Centre.Google Scholar
  6. Hladik, C.M. 1977. A comparative study of the feeding strategies of two sympatric species of leaf-monkey: Presbytis senex and Presbytis entellus. In Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes, T.H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), pp. 323–353. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hladik, C.M. 1978. Adaptive strategies of primates in relation of leaf-eating. In The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores, G.G. Montgomery (ed.), pp. 373–393. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hladik, C.M., Hladik, V., Bousset, J., Valdebouze, P., Viroben, G. and Delor-Laval, J. 1971. The diet of primates on the Barro-Colorado Island (Panama): results of quantitative analysis. Folia Primatologica 16:85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IUCN. 2008. 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org, accessed February 10, 2009.
  10. Janzen, D.H. 1975. Ecology of Plants in the Tropics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  11. Janzen, D.H. 1978. Seedling patterns of tropical trees. In Tropical Trees as Living Systems, P.B. Tomlinson and M.H. Zimmerman (eds.), pp. 83–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Srivastava, A., Das, J., Biswas, J., Bujarborua, P., Sarkar, P., Bernstein, I.S. and Mohnot, S.M. 2001. Primate population decline in response to habitat loss: Borajan reserve forest of Assam, India. Primates 42:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayanta Das
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jihosuo Biswas
    • 1
    • 3
  • Parimal C. Bhattacherjee
    • 1
    • 3
  • S.S. Rao
    • 4
  1. 1.Primate Research CentreNortheast CentreGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Wildlife Areas Development and Welfare TrustGuwahatiIndia
  3. 3.Animal Ecology and Wildlife Biology LaboratoryDepartment of Zoology, Gauhati UniversityGuwahatiIndia
  4. 4.Conservator of Forest (Borders), Department of Environment and ForestsGovernment of AssamGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations