Advertisement

The Gibbons pp 279-311 | Cite as

Monogamy in Mammals: Expanding the Perspective on Hylobatid Mating Systems

  • Luca Morino
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects book series (DIPR)

Introduction

Hylobatids are among the few primate species that live primarily in monogamous (two-adult) groups (Rutberg 1983; Fuentes 1999). Nonetheless, some of their physiological and behavioral characteristics, including their slow life histories (Leighton 1987), a generalized lack of paternal care (Fuentes 1999), and their apparent ability to efficiently defend large territories (Mitani and Rodman 1979), differ from those of most other purportedly monogamous primates (and mammals). Given the relative paucity of monogamous primate species, it may be worthwhile to consider other monogamous mammal species as a valuable additional source of comparative data, as well as of new ideas, innovative methodologies, and theoretical developments.

At the time of the last comprehensive reviews of monogamy in mammals (Kleiman 1977; Wittenberger and Tilson 1980), genetic data were not yet available and long-term field data had not been collected for most species. Subsequent research has provided...

Keywords

Prairie Vole Multimale Group Microtus Ochrogaster Japanese Serow Social Monogamy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Ryne Palombit for support and precious, brain-expanding discussions, Susan Lappan for saintly patience and constant enthusiasm through several drafts, and Danielle Whittaker for additional valuable comments. Most of the researchers whose work is cited in this chapter kindly provided comments, clarifications, unpublished data, further ideas; I gratefully acknowledge their contribution.

References

  1. Bartlett, T.Q. 2003. Intragroup and intergroup social interactions in white-handed gibbons. International Journal of Primatology 24:239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brockelman, W.Y., Reichard, U., Treesucon, U. and Raemaekers, J. 1998. Dispersal, pair formation and social structure in gibbons (Hylobates lar). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42:329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brotherton, P.N.M., Pemberton, J.M., Komers, P.E. and Malarky, G. 1997. Genetic and behavioural evidence of monogamy in a mammal, Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Sciences 264:675–681.Google Scholar
  4. Buech, R.R. 1995. Sex differences in behavior of beavers living in near-boreal lake habitat. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73:2133–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter, C. 1940. A field study in Siam of the behavior and social relations of the gibbon (Hylobates lar). Comparative Psychology Monographs 16:1–201.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, C.S. and Getz, L.L. 1993. Monogamy and the prairie vole. Scientific American 208:70–76.Google Scholar
  7. Chivers, D.J. 1974. The Siamang in Malaya: A Field Study of a Primate in Tropical Rain Forest. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  8. Cowlishaw, G. 1992. Song functions in gibbons. Behaviour 121:131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtis, D.J. and Zaramody, A. 1998. Group size, home range use, and seasonal variation in the ecology of Eulemur mongoz. International Journal of Primatology 19:811–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, N.B. and Lundberg, A. 1984. Food distribution and a variable mating system in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. Journal of Animal Ecology 53:895–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Digby, L.J. 1999. Sexual behavior and extragroup copulations in a wild population of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica 70:136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Digby, L.J. 2000. Infanticide by female mammals: implications for the evolution of social systems. In Infanticide by Males and its Implications, C.P. van Schaik and C. Janson (eds.), pp. 423–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emlen, S.T. 1982. The evolution of helping. I. An ecological constraints model. American Naturalist 119:29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fashing, P.J. 2001. Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez-Duque, E. 2007. The Aotinae: social monogamy in the only nocturnal haplorhines. In Primates in Perspective, C.J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K.C. MacKinnon, M. Panger and S.K. Bearder (eds.), pp. 139–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fernandez-Duque, E., Valeggia, C.R. and Mason, W.A. 2000. Effects of pair-bond and social context on male-female interactions in captive titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch, Primates: Cebidae). Ethology 106:1067–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez-Duque, E., Juárez, C. and Di Fiore, A. 2008. Adult male replacement and subsequent infant care by male and siblings in socially monogamous owl monkeys (Aotus azarai). PrimatesGoogle Scholar
  18. Fietz, J. 1999. Monogamy as a rule rather than exception in nocturnal lemurs: the case of the fat-tailed dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Ethology 105:259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fietz, J., Zischler, H., Schwiegk, C., Tomiuk, J., Dausmann, K.H. and Ganzhorn, J.U. 2000. High rates of extrapair young in the pair-living fat-tailed dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49:8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer, J.O. and Geissmann, T. 1990. Group harmony in gibbons: comparison between white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) and siamang (H. syndactylus). Primates 31:481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foltz, D.W. 1981. Genetic evidence for long-term monogamy in a small rodent, Peromyscus polionotus. American Naturalist 117:665–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuentes, A. 1999. Re-evaluating primate monogamy. American Anthropologist 100:890–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuentes, A. 2000. Hylobatid communities: changing views on pair bonding and social organization in hominoids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 43:33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garza, J.C., Dallas, J., Duryadi, D., Gerasimov, S., Croset, H. and Boursot, P. 1997. Social structure of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 6:1009–1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geissmann, T. 1986. Mate change enhances duetting activity in the siamang gibbon (Hylobates syndactylus). Behaviour 96:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geissmann, T. 1999. Duet songs of the siamang, Hylobates syndactylus: II. testing the pair-bonding hypothesis during a partner exchange. Behaviour 136:1005–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geissmann, T. and Orgeldinger, M. 2000. The relationship between duet songs and pair bonds in siamangs (Hylobates syndactylus). Animal Behaviour 60:805–809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Getz, L.L., McGuire, B. and Carter, C.S. 2003. Social behavior, reproduction and demography of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 15:105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Girman, D.J., Mills, M.G.L., Geffen, E. and Wayne, R.K. 1997. A molecular genetic analysis of social structure, dispersal, and interpack relationships of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40:187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gittins, S.P. and Raemaekers, J.J. 1980. Siamang, lar and agile gibbons. In Malayan Forest Primates: Ten Years' Study in Tropical Rain Forest, D.J. Chivers (ed.), pp. 63–105. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  31. Goldizen, A.W. 1987. Facultative polyandry and the role of infant-carrying in wild saddle-back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goossens, B., Graziani, L., Waits, L.P., Farand, E., Magnolon, S., Coulon, J., Bel, M.C., Taberlet, P. and Allaine, D. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in the monogamous Alpine marmot revealed by nuclear DNA microsatellite analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gouat, P., Katona, K. and Poteaux, C. 2003. Is the socio-spatial distribution of mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus, compatible with a monogamous mating system? Mammalia 67:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, E.M. 1997. Do female red-winged blackbirds benefit genetically from seeking extra-pair copulations? Animal Behaviour 53:605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gubernick, D.J. and Teferi, T. 2000. Adaptive significance of male parental care in a monogamous mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London- Series B: Biological Sciences 267:147–150.Google Scholar
  36. Gursky, S. 2002. Determinants of gregariousness in the spectral tarsier (Prosimian: Tarsius spectrum). Journal of Zoology 256:401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gursky, S. 2005. Associations between adult spectral tarsiers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128:74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hodges, K.E., Mech, S. and Wolff, J.O. 2002. Sex and the single vole: effects of social grouping on prairie vole reproductive success. Ethology 108:871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huck, M., Löttker, P., Böhle, U. and Heymann, E.W. 2005a. Paternity and kinship patterns in polyandrous moustached tamarins (Saguinus mystax). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 127:449–464.Google Scholar
  40. Huck, M., Löttker, P., Heymann, E.W. and Heistermann, M. 2005b. Characterization and social correlates of fecal testosterone and cortisol excretion in wild male Saguinus mystax. International Journal of Primatology 26:159–179.Google Scholar
  41. Isbell, L.A. 2004. Is there no place like home? Ecological bases of female dispersal and philopatry and their consequences for the formation of kin groups. In Kinship and Behavior in Primates, B. Chapais and C.M. Berman (eds.), pp. 71–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kappeler, P.M. and van Schaik, C.P. 2002. Evolution of primate social systems. International Journal of Primatology 23:707–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kishimoto, R. 2003. Social monogamy and social polygyny in a solitary ungulate, the Japanese serow (Capricornis crispus). In Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans and Other Mammals, U. Reichard and C. Boesch (eds.), pp. 147–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kishimoto, R. and Kawamichi, T. 1996. Territoriality and monogamous pairs in a solitary ungulate, the Japanese serow, Capricornis crispus. Animal Behaviour 52:673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kleiman, D.G. 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology 52:39–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kleiman, D.G. and Malcolm, J.R. 1981. The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In Parental Care in Mammals, D.J. Gubernick and P.H. Klopfer (eds.), pp. 347–387. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  47. Komers, P. and Brotherton, P. 1997. Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Sciences 264:1261–1270.Google Scholar
  48. Lappan, S. 2005. Biparental care and male reproductive strategies in siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus) in southern Sumatra. (unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, New York University).Google Scholar
  49. Lappan, S. 2007. Patterns of dispersal in Sumatran siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus): preliminary mtDNA evidence suggests more frequent male than female dispersal to adjacent groups. American Journal of Primatology 69:692–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lappan, S. in press. The effects of lactation and infant care on adult energy budgets in wild siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology.Google Scholar
  51. Leighton, D.R. 1987. Gibbons: territoriality and monogamy. In Primate Societies, B.B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R.M. Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham and T.T. Struhsaker (eds.), pp. 135–145. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lowen, C. and Dunbar, R.I.M. 1994. Territory size and defendability in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. MacKinnon, J.R. and MacKinnon, K.S. 1980. Niche differentiation in a primate community. In Malayan forest Primates: Ten Years' Study in Tropical Rain Forest, D.J. Chivers (ed.), pp. 167–190. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  54. Mahady, S. and Wolf, J.O. 2002. A field study of the Bruce effect in prairie voles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McGuire, B., Getz, L.L. and Oli, M.K. 2002. Fitness consequences of sociality in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster: influence of group size and composition. Animal Behaviour 64:645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mitani, J.C. 1984. The behavioral regulation of monogamy in gibbons (Hylobates muelleri). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15:225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mitani, J.C. 1985. Response of gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) to self, neighbor, and stranger song duets. International Journal of Primatology 6:193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitani, J.C. 1987. Territoriality and monogamy among agile gibbons (Hylobates agilis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20:265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mitani, J.C. and Rodman, P.S. 1979. Territoriality: the relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5:241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moore, A., Ives, M.J. and Kell, L.T. 1994. The role of urine in sibling recognition in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (L) Parr. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Sciences 255:173–180.Google Scholar
  61. Morland, H.S. 1993. Reproductive activity of ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata variegata) in a Madagascar rain forest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 91:71–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neff, B.D. and Sherman, P.W. 2003. Nestling recognition via direct cues by parental male bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Animal Cognition 6:87–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Nievergelt, C.M., Digby, L.J., Ramakrishnan, U. and Woodruff, D.S. 2000. Genetic analysis of group composition and breeding system in a wild common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) population. International Journal of Primatology 21:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nievergelt, C.M., Mutschler, T., Feistner, A.T.C. and Woodruff, D.S. 2002. Social system of the Alaotran gentle lemur (Hapalemur griseus alaotrensis): genetic characterization of group composition and mating system. American Journal of Primatology 57:157–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ohnishi, N., Saitoh, T. and Ishibashi, Y. 2000. Spatial genetic relationships in a population of the Japanese wood mouse Apodemus argenteus. Ecological Research 15:285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oka, T. and Takenaka, O. 2001. Wild gibbons' parentage tested by non-invasive DNA sampling and PCR-amplified polymorphic microsatellites. Primates 42:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Overdorff, D.J. 1996. Ecological correlates to social structure in two Lemur species in Madagascar. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 100:487–506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Packard, J.M., Seal, U.S., Mech, L.D. and Plotka, E.D. 1985. Causes of reproductive failure in two family groups of wolves (Canis lupus). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 68:24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Palombit, R.A. 1993. Lethal territorial aggression in a monogamous primate. American Journal of Primatology 31:311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Palombit, R.A. 1994a. Dynamic pair bonds in hylobatids: implications regarding monogamous social systems. Behaviour 128:65–101.Google Scholar
  71. Palombit, R.A. 1994b. Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Animal Behaviour 47:721–723.Google Scholar
  72. Palombit, R.A. 1996. Pair bonds in monogamous apes: A comparison of the siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and the white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Behaviour 133:321–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Palombit, R.A. 1999. Infanticide and the evolution of pair bonds in nonhuman primates. Evolutionary Anthropology 7:117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Patris, B. and Baudoin, C. 1998. Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Animal Behaviour 56:1465–1470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Patris, B. and Baudoin, C. 2000. A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implications for the mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Behavioural Processes 51:35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Petrie, M. and Kempenaers, B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:52–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pimley, E.R., Bearder, S.K. and Dixson, A.F. 2005. Social organization of the Milne-Edward's potto. American Journal of Primatology 66:317–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Price, E.C. 1992. The costs of infant carrying in captive cotton-top tamarins. American Journal of Primatology 26:23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Raemaekers, J.J. and Raemaekers, P.M. 1985. Field playback of loud calls to gibbons (Hylobates lar): territorial, sex-specific and species-specific responses. Animal Behaviour 33:481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ralls, K., Pilgrim, K.L., White, P.J., Paxinos, E.E., Schwartz, M.K. and Fleischer, R.C. 2001. Kinship, social relationships, and den sharing in kit foxes. Journal of Mammalogy 82:858–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rasoloharijaona, S., Rakotosamimanana, B., Randrianambinina, B. and Zimmermann, E. 2003. Pair-specific usage of sleeping sites and their implications for social organization in a nocturnal Malagasy primate, the Milne Edwards' sportive lemur (Lepilemur edwardsi). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 122:251–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Reich, A. 1981. The behavior and ecology of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus) in the Kruger National Park. (Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University).Google Scholar
  83. Reichard, U. 1995. Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon (Hylobates lar). Ethology 100:99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Reichard, U. 2003. Social monogamy in gibbons: the male perspective. In Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans, and Other Mammals, U. Reichard and C. Boesch (eds.), pp. 190–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Ribble, D.O. 1991. The monogamous mating system of Peromyscus californicus as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29:161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ribble, D.O. 2003. The evolution of social and reproductive monogamy in Peromyscus: evidence from Peromyscus californicus (the California mouse). In Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans and Other Mammals, U. Reichard and C. Boesch (eds.), pp. 81–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Roberts, R.L., Williams, J.R., Wang, A.K. and Carter, C.S. 1998. Cooperative breeding and monogamy in prairie voles: influence of the sire and geographical variation. Animal Behaviour 55:1131–1140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rotundo, M., Fernandez-Duque, E. and Dixson, A.F. 2005. Infant development and parental care in free-ranging Aotus azarai azarai in Argentina. International Journal of Primatology 26:1459–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Runcie, M.J. 2000. Biparental care and obligate monogamy in the rock-haunting possum, Petropseudes dahli, from tropical Australia. Animal Behaviour 59:1001–1008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rutberg, A.T. 1983. The evolution of monogamy in primates. Journal of Theoretical Biology 104:93–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sangchantr, S. 2004. Social organization and ecology of Mentawai leaf monkeys. (unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University).Google Scholar
  92. Schülke, O. 2003. To breed or not to breed – food competition and other factors involved in female breeding decisions in the pair-living nocturnal fork-marked lemur (Phaner furcifer). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schülke, O. 2005. Evolution of pair-living in Phaner furcifer. International Journal of Primatology 26:903–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schülke, O. and Kappeler, P.M. 2003. So near and yet so far: territorial pairs but low cohesion between pair partners in a nocturnal lemur, Phaner furcifer. Animal Behaviour 65:311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schülke, O., Kappeler, P.M. and Zischler, H. 2004. Small testes size despite high extra-pair paternity in the pair-living nocturnal primate Phaner furcifer. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sharpe, F. and Rosell, F. 2003. Time budgets and sex differences in the Eurasian beaver. Animal Behaviour 66:1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sillero-Zubiri, C., Gottelli, D. and Macdonald, D.W. 1996. Male philopatry, extra pack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38:331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sommer, S. and Tichy, H. 1999. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II polymorphism and paternity in the monogamous Hypogeomys antimena, the endangered, largest endemic Malagasy rodent. Molecular Ecology 8:1259–1272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sommer, V. and Reichard, U. 2000. Rethinking monogamy: the gibbon case. In Primate Males, P.M. Kappeler (ed.), pp. 159–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Spencer, P.B.S., Horsup, A.B. and Marsh, H.D. 1998. Enhancement of reproductive success through mate choice in a social rock-wallaby, Petrogale assimilis (Macropodidae) as revealed by microsatellite markers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stacey, P.B. and Ligon, J.D. 1987. Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker, and a challenge to the habitat saturation model of cooperative breeding. American Naturalist 130:654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sterck, E.H.M., Watts, D.P. and van Schaik, C.P. 1997. The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sun, L. 2003. Monogamy correlates, socioecological factors, and mating systems in beavers. In Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans and Other Mammals, U. Reichard and C. Boesch (eds.), pp. 138–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Tan, C.L. 1999. Group composition, home range size, and diet of three sympatric bamboo lemur species (genus Hapalemur) in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 20:547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tenaza, R.R. 1975. Territory and monogamy among Kloss' gibbons (Hylobates klossii) in Siberut Island, Indonesia. Folia Primatologica 24:60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Thalmann, U. 2001. Food resource characteristics in two nocturnal lemurs with different social behavior: Avahi occidentalis and Lepilemur edwardsi. International Journal of Primatology 22:287–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Thalmann, U. 2002. Contrasts between two nocturnal leaf-eating lemurs. Evolutionary Anthropology 11:105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tilson, R.L. 1981. Family formation strategies of Kloss's gibbons. Folia Primatologica 35:259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Travis, S.E., Slobodchikoff, C.N. and Keim, P. 1995. Ecological and demographic effects on intraspecific variation in the social system of prairie dogs. Ecology 76:1794–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. van Schaik, C.P. and Dunbar, R.I.M. 1990. The evolution of monogamy in large primates: a new hypothesis and some crucial tests. Behaviour 115:30–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. van Schaik, C.P. and Kappeler, P.M. 2003. The evolution of social monogamy in primates. In Monogamy: Mating Strategies and Partnerships in Birds, Humans, and Other Mammals, U. Reichard and C. Boesch (eds.), pp. 59–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Vasey, N. 2006. Impact of seasonality and reproduction on social structure, ranging patterns, and fission-fusion social organization in red ruffed lemurs. In Lemurs: Ecology and Adaptation, L. Gould and M.L. Sauther (eds.), pp. 275–304. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  113. Wiens, F. and Zitzmann, A. 2003. Social structure of the solitary slow loris Nycticebus coucang (Lorisidae). Journal of Zoology 261:35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wittenberger, J.F. and Tilson, R.L. 1980. The evolution of monogamy: hypotheses and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wolff, J.O., Mech, S.G., Dunlap, A.S. and Hodges, K.E. 2002. Multi-male mating by paired and unpaired female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behaviour 139:1147–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wrangham, R.W. 1980. An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75:262–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Zinner, D., Hilgartner, R.D., Kappeler, P.M., Pietsch, T. and Ganzhorn, J.U. 2003. Social organization of Lepilemur ruficaudatus. International Journal of Primatology 24:869–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations