Abstract
Migraine is a common primary headache disorder with effective evidence-based preventive medications that reduce the frequency and severity of attacks. Cluster headaches and other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias are uncommon with evidence-based acute treatment options available for cluster headache and preventive medications for cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania, and SUNCT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventative therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343–9.
Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193–210.
Stewart WF, Linet MS, Celentano DD, et al. Age- and sex-specific incidence rates of migraine with and without visual aura. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134(10):1111–20.
Stewart WF, Bigal ME, Lipton RB, et al. Lifetime migraine incidence. Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache. 2005;46:52–60.
Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343–9.
Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:9–160.
Dodick DW, Silberstein SD. Migraine prevention. Prac Neurol. 2007;7:383–93.
Silberstein SD, Winner PK, Chmiel JJ. Migraine preventive medication reduces resource utilization. Headache. 2003;43:171–8.
Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review) report of the Quality Standards Subcommitte of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55:754–62.
Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, Goadsby PJ, et al. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine-report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:560–72.
Swanson JW, Yanagihara T, Stang PE, et al. Incidence of cluster headaches: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology. 1994;44:433–7.
Black DF, Swanson JW, Stang PE. Decreasing incidence of cluster headache: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Headache. 2005;45:220–3.
Tonon C, Guttmann S, Volpini M, et al. Prevalence and incidence of cluster headache in the Republic of San Marino. Neurology. 2002;58:1407.
Fischera M, Marziniak M, Gralow I, et al. The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:614–8.
Francis GJ, Becker WJ, Pringsheim TM. Acute and preventive pharmacologic treatment of cluster headache. Neurology. 2010;75:463–73.
Wheeler SD, Carrazana EJ. Topiramate-treated cluster headache. Neurology. 1999;53:234–6.
Schuh-Hofer S, Israel H, Neeb L, Reuter U, Arnold G. The use of gabapentin in chronic cluster headache patients refractory to first-line therapy. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14:694–6.
Schoenen J, Di Clemente L, Vandenheede M, et al. Hypothalamic stimulation in chronic cluster headache: a pilot study of efficacy and mode of action. Brain. 2005;128:940–7.
Leone M, Franzini A, Broggi G, Bussone G. Hypothalamic stimulation for intractable cluster headache: long-term experience. Neurology. 2006;67:150–2.
Leone M, Proiette Cecchini A, Franzini A, et al. Lessons from 8 years experience of hypothalamic stimulation in cluster headache. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:789–97.
Burns B, Watkins L, Goadsby PJ. Treatment of intractable cluster headache by occipital nerve stimulation in 14 patients. Neurology. 2009;72:341–5.
May A, Leone M, Afra J, Linde M, Sandor PS, Evers S, et al. EFNS guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache and other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:1066–77.
Cohen AS, Goadsby PJ. Paroxysmal hemicrania responding to topiramate. JNNP. 2007;78:96–7.
Cohen AS, Matharu MS, Goadsby PJ. Shortlasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) or cranial autonomic features (SUNA)-a prospective clinical study of SUNCT and SUNA. Brain. 2006;129:2746–60.
Manzoni GC, Micieli G, Granella F, et al. Cluster headache-course over ten years in 189 patients. Cephalalgia. 1991;11:169–74.
Igarashi H, Sakai F. Natural history of cluster headache. Cephalalgia. 1996;16:390–1.
Pareja JA, Caminero AB, Franco E, et al. Dose, efficacy and tolerability of long-term indomethacin treatment of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. Cephalagia. 2001;21:869–938.
Pareja JA, Sjaastad O. SUNCT syndrome. A clinical review. Headache. 1997;37:195–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Definition of Class I and Class II Studies
Appendix: Definition of Class I and Class II Studies
Class I: A randomized, controlled clinical trial of the intervention of interest with masked or objective outcome assessment, in a representative population. Relevant baseline characteristics are presented and substantially equivalent among treatment groups or there is appropriate statistical adjustment for differences.
The following are also required:
-
a.
Concealed allocation
-
b.
Primary outcome(s) clearly defined
-
c.
Exclusion/inclusion criteria clearly defined
-
d.
Adequate accounting for drop outs (with at least 80% of enrolled subjects completing the study) and crossovers with numbers sufficiently low to have minimal potential for bias.
-
e.
For noninferiority or equivalence trials claiming to prove efficacy for one or both drugs, the following are also required:
-
1.
The authors explicitly state the clinically meaningful difference to be excluded by defining the threshold for equivalence or noninferiority.
-
2.
The standard treatment used in the study is substantially similar to that used in previous studies establishing efficacy of the standard treatment. (e.g., for a drug, the mode of administration, dose, and dosage adjustments are similar to those previously shown to be effective).
-
3.
The inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection and the outcomes of patients on the standard treatment are comparable to those of previous studies establishing efficacy of the standard treatment.
-
4.
The interpretation of the results of the study is based upon a per protocol analysis that takes into account dropouts or crossovers.
-
1.
Class II: A randomized controlled clinical trial of the intervention of interest in a representative population with masked or objective outcome assessment that lacks one criteria a–e above or a prospective matched cohort study with masked or objective outcome assessment in a representative population that meets b–e above. Relevant baseline characteristics are presented and substantially equivalent among treatment groups or there is appropriate statistical adjustment for differences.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dilli, E., Dodick, D.W. (2012). Headache. In: Burneo, J., Demaerschalk, B., Jenkins, M. (eds) Neurology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88555-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88555-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-88554-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-88555-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)