Simulation Of Advanced Train Control Systems
- 1.2k Downloads
This paper describes an Advanced Train Control System (ATCS) simulation environment created using the Network Simulator 2 (ns-2) discrete event network simulation system. The ATCS model is verified using ATCS monitoring software, laboratory results and a comparison with a mathematical model of ATCS communications. The simulation results are useful in understanding ATCS communication characteristics and identifying protocol strengths, weaknesses, vulnerabilities and mitigation techniques. By setting up a suite of ns-2 scripts, an engineer can simulate hundreds of possible scenarios in the space of a few seconds to investigate failure modes and consequences.
KeywordsRailroads wireless networks ATCS ns-2 simulation
- 1.Association of American Railroads, System Architecture: ATCS Specification 100 (Revision 4.0), Washington, DC (www.atcsmon.com/100 _4_0.htm), 1995.
- 2.G. Baker, Schoolboy hacks into city's tram system, The Daily Telegraph, January 11, 2008.Google Scholar
- 3.M. Benke, On the Survivability of Transportation Systems, M.S. Thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 2005.Google Scholar
- 5.S. Butapati, R. Kalidindi, M. Benke, A. Abdel-Rahim, P. Oman and B. Johnson, A case study of critical point identification in the physical and communication layers of a small urban transportation system, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 2(4), pp. 319–330, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.P. Craven, A brief look at railroad communication vulnerabilities, i Proceedings of the Seventh International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 245–249, 2004.Google Scholar
- 7.P. Craven, Security of RCL wireless railway communications, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, pp. 711–715, 2005.Google Scholar
- 8.P. Craven and S. Craven, Security of ATCS wireless railway communications, Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, pp. 227–238, 2005.Google Scholar
- 9.P. Craven and S. Craven, Security of railway EOT systems, Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, pp. 199–204, 2005.Google Scholar
- 10.K. Fall and K. Varadhan, The Network Simulator — ns-2 (nsnam.isi.edu/ns nam/index.php/Main_Page).Google Scholar
- 11.Federal Railroad Administration, Positive train control overview, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (www.fra.dot.gov/us/con tent/1265).
- 14.D. Houy, ATCS monitor for Windows (www.atcsmon.com).
- 15.G. Hufford, The ITS Irregular Terrain Model (version 1.2.2), Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Boulder, Colorado (flattop.its.bldrdoc.gov/itm /itm.alg.pdf), 1999.Google Scholar
- 16.Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, C++ code for Longley-Rice propagation, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Boulder, Colorado (flattop.its.bldrdoc.gov/itm.html), 2007.Google Scholar
- 17.A. Longley and P. Rice, Prediction of Tropospheric Radio Transmission Loss over Irregular Terrain: A Computer Method, ESSA Technical Report ERL 79-ITS 67, Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Boulder, Colorado (www.its.bldrdoc.gov/pub/essa/essa.erl79-its.67), 1968.
- 18.J. Magliacane, Splat! RF signal propagation, loss and terrain analysis tool (www.qsl.net/kd2bd/splat.html).
- 19.N. Mead, R. Ellison, R. Linger, T. Longstaff and J. McHugh, Surviv-able Network Analysis Method, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-013, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2000.Google Scholar
- 20.P. Rice, A. Longley, K. Norton and A. Barsis, Transmission Loss Prediction for Tropospheric Communication Circuits, Volumes I and II, Technical Note 101, Institute for Telecommunication Sciences, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Boulder, Colorado (www.its.bldrdoc.gov/pub/ntia-rpt/tn101), 1967.Google Scholar
- 21.L. Ritter, J. Barrett and R. Wilson, Securing Global Transportation Networks, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
- 22.Securities and Exchange Commission, Norfolk Southern Corporation: Form 10-K (Fiscal year ending December 31, 2003), Washington, DC (www.secinfo.com/dwDMq.11q.htm), 2004.
- 23.H. Sharif and E. Furman, Analytical model for ATCS inbound RF channel throughput, Proceedings of the Forty-First IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 885–892, 1991.Google Scholar
- 24.D. Smith, Digital Transmission Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 2003.Google Scholar
- 25.T. Smith, The impact of highway infrastructure on economic performance, Public Roads Magazine, vol. 57(4), pp. 8–14, 1994.Google Scholar
- 26.The White House, The National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets, Washington, DC (www.white house.gov/pcipb/physical_strategy.pdf), 2003.
- 27.United States Geological Survey, 1:250,000-scale digital elevation model (DEM), Reston, Virginia (edcftp.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data).Google Scholar
- 28.J. Waite, M. Benke, N. Nguyen, M. Phillips, S. Melton, P. Oman, A. Abdel-Rahim and B. Johnson, A combined approach to ITS vulnerability and survivability analyses, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 262–267, 2004.Google Scholar
- 29.D. Wetherall, OTcl (otcl-tclcl.sourceforge.net/otcl).Google Scholar
- D. Williams, B. Metzger and G. Richardson, Spec 200 radio code line ducting - Cause and effect, Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association Conference, 2001.Google Scholar