Mitigating Accidents In Oil And Gas Production Facilities

  • Stig Johnsen
Conference paper
Part of the The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 290)

Integrated operations are increasingly used in oil and gas production facilities to improve yields, reduce costs and maximize profits. They leverage information and communications technology (ICT) to facilitate collaboration between experts at widely dispersed locations. This paper discusses the safety and security consequences of implementing integrated operations for oil and gas production. It examines the increased accident risk arising from the tight coupling of complex ICT and SCADA systems, and proposes technological, organizational and human factors based strategies for mitigating the risk.


Oil and gas production integrated operations accident mitigation 


  1. 1.
    K. Andersen, IO in StatoilHydro - Drilling and well, presented at the Forum for Human Factors in Control ( s%20and%20projects/0-HFC%20-%20M%C3%B8tereferat%20april%2008.pdf), 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Argyris and D. Schon, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Hendrick and L. Benner, Investigating Accidents with STEP, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Hollnagel, D. Woods and N. Leveson, Resilience Engineering, Ashgate, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Jaatun, S. Johnsen, M. Line, O. Longva, I. Tondel, E. Albrechtsen and I. Waero, Incident Response Management in the Oil and Gas Industry, SINTEF Report A4086, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway ( load/10977/20071212IRMA_Rapport.pdf), 2007.
  6. 6.
    S. Johnsen, R. Ask and R. Roisli, Reducing risk in oil and gas production operations, in Critical Infrastructure Protection, E. Goetz and S. Shenoi (Eds.), Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 83–95, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Johnsen, C. Hansen, M. Line, Y. Nordby, E. Rich and Y. Qian, CheckIT- A program to measure and improve information security and safety culture, International Journal of Performability Engineering, vol. 3(1), pp. 174–186, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Johnsen, M. Lundteigen, E. Albrechtsen and T. Grotan, Trusler og muligheter knyttet til eDrift, SINTEF Report A04433, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway ( %20og%20p%C3%A5litelighet/Rapporter/STF38%20A04433.pdf), 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. LaPorte and P. Consolini, Working in practice but not in theory: The oretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 1(1), pp. 19–48, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Perrow, Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Roberts, New challenges in organizational research: High reliability organizations, Organization and Environment, vol. 3(2), pp. 111–125, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Stouffer, J. Falco and K. Scarfone, Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security, NIST Special Publication 800-82, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Turner and N. Pidgeon, Man-Made Disasters, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Weick and K. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California,2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stig Johnsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Norway

Personalised recommendations